Antipsychotic augmentation for major depressive disorder: A review of clinical practice guidelines

被引:14
|
作者
Simons, Peter [1 ,2 ]
Cosgrove, Lisa [1 ,2 ]
Shaughnessy, Allen F. [3 ,4 ]
Bursztajn, Harold [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Counseling, 100 Morrissey Blvd, Boston, MA 02125 USA
[2] Univ Massachusetts, Sch Psychol, 100 Morrissey Blvd, Boston, MA 02125 USA
[3] Tufts Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[4] Cambridge Hlth Alliance, Malden, MA USA
[5] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Psychiat, Cambridge, MA USA
关键词
Major depressive disorder; Antipsychotic; Treatment resistant depression; Augmentation strategy; Clinical practice guideline; Informed consent; ANXIETY TREATMENTS; CANADIAN NETWORK; ATYPICAL ANTIPSYCHOTICS; MANAGEMENT; MOOD; PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY; ANTIDEPRESSANTS; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijlp.2017.10.003
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) are seen as the gold standard of evidence-based care. Because of their influence, these guidelines can have profound legal and economic effects. Despite their proliferation and influence, the trustworthiness and quality of guidelines have been seriously questioned and they have been implicated as drivers of overtreatment. In the U.S,augmentation with second generation antipsychotics (SGAs) is becoming an increasingly common strategy for treating major depressive disorder (MDD) when initial antidepressant treatment does not result in remission of symptoms. However, there is debate about the evidence for augmentation and whether this strategy is a form of overtreatment. We conducted a systematic search to identify treatment guidelines for MDD. Fourteen international guidelines met inclusion criteria and we reviewed them to determine: 1) if augmentation with SGAs was recommended for patients who did not respond to antidepressant medication; 2) what evidence was cited for the recommendation for or against augmentation; 3) the extent to which the guidelines addressed risk/benefit concerns when making their recommendations. There was significant variation among the CPGs regarding the recommendation to augment with antipsychotic medication for Major Depressive Disorder. Seven guidelines explicitly recommended augmentation with antipsychotics; 1 guideline reviewed the evidence but neither recommended for nor against; 1 guideline did not make a clear recommendation; 2 guidelines explicitly recommended against augmentation; and 3 guidelines did not address augmentation with antipsychotics as a potential treatment strategy. There was wide variation in terms of attention to risk/benefit issues and to the conditions under which augmentation should be considered. The results are discussed in terms of the implications for risk management and informed consent practices. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:64 / 71
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Acupuncture for major depressive disorder: A review of the recommendations stated at clinical practice guidelines
    Ernesto Fernandez-Chinguel, Jose
    Goicochea-Lugo, Sergio
    Villarreal-Zegarra, David
    Taype-Rondan, Alvaro
    Hanae Zafra-Tanaka, Jessica
    COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES IN MEDICINE, 2020, 49
  • [2] Atypical Antipsychotic Augmentation Strategies in the Context of Guideline-based Care for the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder
    Patkar, Ashvvin A.
    Pae, Chi-Un
    CNS DRUGS, 2013, 27 : S29 - S37
  • [3] Clinical correlates of augmentation/combination treatment strategies in major depressive disorder
    Dold, M.
    Bartova, L.
    Mendlewicz, J.
    Souery, D.
    Serretti, A.
    Porcelli, S.
    Zohar, J.
    Montgomery, S.
    Kasper, S.
    ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 2018, 137 (05) : 401 - 412
  • [4] Major depressive disorder in the general hospital:: adaptation of clinical practice guidelines
    Voellinger, R
    Berney, A
    Baumann, P
    Annoni, JM
    Bryois, C
    Buclin, T
    Büla, C
    Camus, V
    Christin, L
    Cornuz, J
    de Goumoëns, P
    Lamy, O
    Strnad, J
    Burnand, B
    Stiefel, F
    GENERAL HOSPITAL PSYCHIATRY, 2003, 25 (03) : 185 - 193
  • [5] A Systematic Review of Augmentation Strategies for Patients with Major Depressive Disorder
    Fleurence, Rachael
    Williamson, Rebecca
    Jing, Yonghua
    Kim, Edward
    Tran, Quynh-Van
    Pikalov, Andrei
    Thase, Michael E.
    PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY BULLETIN, 2009, 42 (03) : 57 - 90
  • [6] Goal setting and goal attainment in patients with major depressive disorder: a narrative review on shared decision making in clinical practice
    Baldwin, David S.
    Adair, Michael
    Micheelsen, Arun
    Astrom, Daniel Oudin
    Reines, Elin H.
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2024, 40 (03) : 483 - 491
  • [7] Clinical Guideline (CANMAT 2016) Discordance of Medications for Patients with Major Depressive Disorder in China
    Zhu, Yuncheng
    Wu, Zhiguo
    Zhao, Dongmei
    Wu, Xiaohui
    He, Ruoqiao
    Wang, Zuowei
    Peng, Daihui
    Fang, Yiru
    NEUROPSYCHIATRIC DISEASE AND TREATMENT, 2023, 19 : 829 - 839
  • [8] Clinical practice guidelines on the assessment and management of cognitive impairment in major depressive disorder
    Singh, Om Prakash
    Avinash, Priya Ranjan
    Gautam, Anita
    Prasad, Anshu
    Jagawat, Tushar
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2025, 67 (01) : 98 - 105
  • [9] The Mistreatment of Major Depressive Disorder
    Paris, Joel
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE, 2014, 59 (03): : 148 - 151
  • [10] Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Failed Antidepressant Treatment Response in Major Depressive Disorder, Dysthymia, and Subthreshold Depression in Adults
    MacQueen, Glenda
    Santaguida, Pasqualina
    Keshavarz, Homa
    Jaworska, Natalia
    Levine, Mitchell
    Beyene, Joseph
    Raina, Parminder
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE, 2017, 62 (01): : 11 - 23