Estimating daily PM2.5 concentrations using an extreme gradient boosting model based on VIIRS aerosol products over southeastern Europe

被引:13
作者
Gundogdu, Serdar [1 ]
Tuygun, Gizem Tuna [2 ]
Li, Zhanqing [3 ]
Wei, Jing [4 ]
Elbir, Tolga [2 ]
机构
[1] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Bergama Vocat High Sch, Comp Technol Program, Bergama Izmir, Turkey
[2] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Environm Engn, Buca Izmir, Turkey
[3] Univ Maryland, Earth Syst Sci Interdisciplinary Ctr, Dept Atmospher & Ocean Sci, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[4] Univ Iowa, Ctr Global & Reg Environm Res, Iowa Technol Inst, Dept Chem & Biochem Engn, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
基金
美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
PM2.5; estimation; XGBoost; Aerosol optical depth; VIIRS; Southeastern Europe; EMERGENCY-ROOM VISITS; LONG-RANGE TRANSPORT; RANDOM FOREST MODEL; PARTICULATE MATTER; AIR-POLLUTION; METEOROLOGICAL FACTORS; PM10; CONCENTRATIONS; SATELLITE DATA; OPTICAL DEPTH; ONE DECADE;
D O I
10.1007/s11869-022-01245-5
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The performance of aerosol optical depth (AOD) products from the visible infrared imaging radiometer suite (VIIRS) instrument to estimate ground-level PM2.5 concentrations has been determined at different locations; however, it is still limited over Europe. VIIRS dark target (DT) and deep blue (DB) AOD products at 6-km spatial resolution and independent variables from the MERRA-2 reanalysis were used for estimating daily PM2.5 concentrations in southeastern Europe. An estimation model based on the Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) approach was developed and tested for DT and DB AODs. The estimations were compared with daily PM2.5 observations from 122 air quality monitoring stations in five countries, including Bulgaria, Cyprus, Greece, Romania, and Turkey. The estimated PM2.5 concentrations were consistent with ground measurements with the Pearson correlation coefficient (R) of 0.82 and 0.78, showing overall low estimation uncertainties with the root mean square error (RMSE) of 7.43 and 8.38 mu g/m(3) and the mean absolute error (MAE) of 4.76 and 5.31 mu g/m(3) for DT and DB AOD datasets, respectively. Independent model results were also discussed based on each country and season. The best estimation accuracy reached the R value of 0.83 with an average RMSE of 9.05 mu g/m(3) and an MAE of 5.84 mu g/m(3) in Turkey with DB AOD. In contrast, the model with DT AOD was highly accurate with the R value of 0.85, showing minor overall uncertainties (i.e., RMSE = 6.08 and 3.31 mu g/m(3)) over Greece. The highest accuracies were obtained in autumn and spring, while the lowest ones were available in winter and summer. This study provides a feasible machine learning approach to estimate PM2.5 using VIIRS AOD products in southeastern Europe.
引用
收藏
页码:2185 / 2198
页数:14
相关论文
共 83 条
  • [1] Spatio-temporal variability of desert dust storms in Eastern Mediterranean (Crete, Cyprus, Israel) between 2006 and 2017 using a uniform methodology
    Achilleos, Souzana
    Mouzourides, Petros
    Kalivitis, Nikos
    Katra, Itzhak
    Kloog, Itai
    Kouis, Panayiotis
    Middleton, Nicos
    Mihalopoulos, Nikos
    Neophytou, Marina
    Panayiotou, Andrie
    Papatheodorou, Stefania
    Savvides, Chrysanthos
    Tymvios, Filippos
    Vasiliadou, Emily
    Yiallouros, Panayiotis
    Koutrakis, Petros
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 714
  • [2] Analysis and Modelling of PM2.5 Temporal and Spatial Behaviors in European Cities
    Adaes, Jose
    Pires, Jose C. M.
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (21)
  • [3] Estimating fine particulate concentration using a combined approach of linear regression and artificial neural network
    Ahmad, Maqbool
    Alam, Khan
    Tariq, Shahina
    Anwar, Sajid
    Nasir, Jawad
    Mansha, Muhammad
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 219
  • [4] Ambient particulate matter source apportionment using receptor modelling in European and Central Asia urban areas
    Almeida, S. M.
    Manousakas, M.
    Diapouli, E.
    Kertesz, Z.
    Samek, L.
    Hristova, E.
    Sega, K.
    Alvarez, R. Padilla
    Belis, C. A.
    Eleftheriadis, K.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2020, 266 (266)
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2002, Geophys. Res. Lett, DOI [DOI 10.1029/2001GL013206, 10.1029/2001GL013206]
  • [6] One decade of parallel fine (PM2.5) and coarse (PM10-PM2.5) particulate matter measurements in Europe: trends and variability
    Barmpadimos, I.
    Keller, J.
    Oderbolz, D.
    Hueglin, C.
    Prevot, A. S. H.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2012, 12 (07) : 3189 - 3203
  • [7] Spatially-varying surface roughness and ground-level air quality in an operational dispersion model
    Barnes, M. J.
    Brade, T. K.
    MacKenzie, A. R.
    Whyatt, J. D.
    Carruthers, D. J.
    Stocker, J.
    Cai, X.
    Hewitt, C. N.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2014, 185 : 44 - 51
  • [8] Bayesian geostatistical modelling of PM10 and PM2.5 surface level concentrations in Europe using high-resolution satellite-derived products
    Beloconi, Anton
    Chrysoulakis, Nektarios
    Lyapustin, Alexei
    Utzinger, Jurg
    Vounatsou, Penelope
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 121 : 57 - 70
  • [9] Biecek P., 2021, Explanatory Model Analysis
  • [10] Machine Learning Models to Predict Critical Episodes of Environmental Pollution for PM2.5 and PM10 in Talca, Chile
    Carreno, Gonzalo
    Lopez-Cortes, Xaviera A.
    Marchant, Carolina
    [J]. MATHEMATICS, 2022, 10 (03)