A randomized, prospective, pharmacoeconomic trial of tacrolimus versus cyclosporine in combination with thymoglobulin in renal transplant recipients

被引:47
|
作者
Hardinger, KL
Bohl, DL
Schnitzler, MA
Lockwood, M
Storch, GA
Brennan, DC
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Dept Pharm Practice, Kansas City, MO 64110 USA
[2] St Louis Univ, Dept Internal Med, St Louis, MO 63103 USA
[3] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[4] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
关键词
pharmacoeconomic; thymoglobulin; tacrolimus; cyclosporine; renal transplant;
D O I
10.1097/01.TP.0000162980.68628.5A
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. To date, the clinical trials of tacrolimus (TAG) versus cyclosporine modified (CsA), have not defined which agent is more cost-effective for immunosuppression in renal transplant recipients especially in a quadruple immunosuppressive regimen. Methods. The objective of this randomized, prospective study was to compare the clinical and economic outcomes of TAC versus CsA, in a regimen that consisted of Thymoglobulin induction, an antimetabolite, and prednisone. Between December 2000 and October 2002, 200 patients were enrolled and randomized in a 2:1 fashion (TAC n=134, CsA n=66). Results. At 1 year, acute rejection (4% TAC vs. 6% CsA), patient survival (TAC 99% vs. CsA 100%), and graft survival (95% TAC versus 100% CsA, P=0.059) were similar. Serum creatinine levels were lower in the TAC group compared with the CsA group (1.3 +/- 0.3 vs. 1.6 +/- 0.7 mg/dL, P=0.03). The incidence of CMV infection was similar between the groups and two patients, both in the TAC arm, developed malignancy. Anti-hypertensive requirement (32% TAC vs. 32% CsA) and the incidence of posttransplant diabetes mellitus (4% TAC vs. 2% CsA) were similar. Pretransplant, fewer TAC patients received dyslipidemia treatment (40% TAC vs. 67% CsA, P=0.0005), while more CsA patients were able to discontinue these medications posttransplant (absolute change 25% TAC vs. 47% CsA). Total 12-month medication costs were similar ($17,723 +/- 11,647 TAC vs. $16,515 +/- 10,189 CsA). Conclusions. When combined with Thymoglobulin induction, an antimetabolite, and corticosteroids, TAC and CsA are comparable in safety, efficacy, and cost in renal transplantation.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 46
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dyslipidaemia among renal transplant recipients: cyclosporine versus tacrolimus
    Fazal, Muhammad Asim
    Idrees, Muhammad Khalid
    Akhtar, Syed Fazal
    JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2014, 64 (05) : 496 - 499
  • [2] Steroid withdrawal in living donor renal transplant recipients using tacrolimus and cyclosporine: a randomized prospective study
    Park, Jae Berm
    Kim, Sung-Joo
    Oh, Ha Young
    Han, Young Seok
    Kim, Doo Jin
    Park, Jin Wan
    Kwon, Choon Hyuck
    Joh, Jae-Won
    Lee, Suk-Koo
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 19 (06) : 478 - 484
  • [3] Tacrolimus, cyclosporine and plasma lipoproteins in renal transplant recipients
    Venkiteswaran, K
    Sgoutas, DS
    Santanam, N
    Neylan, JE
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 14 (06) : 405 - 410
  • [4] Long-term results of a prospective randomized trial comparing tacrolimus versus cyclosporine in African-American recipients of primary cadaver renal transplant
    Jarzembowski, T
    Panaro, F
    Raofi, V
    Dong, GL
    Testa, G
    Sankary, H
    Benedetti, E
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 18 (04) : 419 - 422
  • [5] Mycophenolate mofetil for renal dysfunction in liver transplant recipients on cyclosporine or tacrolimus: Randomized, prospective, multicenter pilot study results
    Reich, DJ
    Clavien, PA
    Hodge, EE
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 80 (01) : 18 - 25
  • [6] A prospective randomized multicenter study of tacrolimus in combination with sirolimus in renal-transplant recipients.
    van Hooff, JP
    Squifflet, JP
    Wlodarczyk, Z
    Vanrenterghem, Y
    Paczek, L
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 75 (12) : 1934 - 1939
  • [7] Single-center experience with tacrolimus versus cyclosporine-Neoral in renal transplant recipients
    Boots, JMM
    van Duijnhoven, EM
    Christiaans, MHL
    Nieman, FHM
    van Suylen, RJ
    van Hooff, JP
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 14 (06) : 370 - 383
  • [8] The different effects of cyclosporine and tacrolimus on lipid metabolism in renal transplant recipients
    Wang, JD
    Ichimaru, N
    Takahara, S
    Kokado, Y
    Toki, K
    Permpongkosol, S
    Ding, X
    Nonomura, N
    Matsumiya, K
    Okuyama, A
    TRANSPLANTATION, 1999, 67 (07) : S145 - S145
  • [9] Randomized trial of mycophenolate mofetil versus enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in primary renal transplant recipients given tacrolimus and daclizumab/thymoglobulin: One year follow-up
    Ciancio, Gaetano
    Burke, George W.
    Gaynor, Jeffrey J.
    Roth, David
    Sageshima, Junichiro
    Kupin, Warren
    Tueros, Lissett
    Hanson, Lois
    Rosen, Anne
    Ruiz, Phillip
    Miller, Joshua
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2008, 86 (01) : 67 - 74
  • [10] Rimonabant Affects Cyclosporine A, but Not Tacrolimus Pharmacokinetics in Renal Transplant Recipients
    Amundsen, Rune
    Asberg, Anders
    Robertsen, Ida
    Vethe, Nils T.
    Bergan, Stein
    Hartmann, Anders
    Midtvedt, Karsten
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 87 (08) : 1221 - 1224