Accuracy vs efficiency trade-offs in optical flow algorithms

被引:99
作者
Liu, HC
Hong, TH
Herman, M
Camus, T
Chellappa, R
机构
[1] Natl Inst Stand & Technol, Intelligent Syst Div, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Dept Elect Engn, Ctr Automat Res, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
关键词
low level processing; motion; optical flow; evaluation; real-time implementation;
D O I
10.1006/cviu.1998.0675
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
There have been two thrusts in the development of optical flow algorithms. One has emphasized higher accuracy; the other faster implementation. These two thrusts, however, have been independently pursued, without addressing the accuracy vs efficiency trade-offs. Although the accuracy-efficiency characteristic is algorithm dependent, an understanding of a general pattern is crucial in evaluating an algorithm as far as real-world tasks are concerned, which often pose various performance requirements. This paper addresses many implementation issues that have often been neglected in previous research, including temporal filtering of the output stream, algorithms' flexibility, and robustness to noise, subsampling, etc. Their impacts on accuracy and/or efficiency are emphasized. We present a survey of different approaches toward the goal of higher performance and present experimental studies on accuracy vs efficiency trade-offs. A detailed analysis of how this trade-off affects algorithm design is manifested in a case study involving two state-of-the-art optical flow algorithms: a gradient and a correlation-based method, The goal of this paper is to bridge the gap between the accuracy-and the efficiency-oriented approaches. (C) 1998 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 286
页数:16
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   AUTOMATED TRACKING AND GRASPING OF A MOVING OBJECT WITH A ROBOTIC HAND EYE SYSTEM [J].
ALLEN, PK ;
TIMCENKO, A ;
YOSHIMI, B ;
MICHELMAN, P .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION, 1993, 9 (02) :152-165
[2]   A COMPUTATIONAL FRAMEWORK AND AN ALGORITHM FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF VISUAL-MOTION [J].
ANANDAN, P .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER VISION, 1989, 2 (03) :283-310
[3]  
Ancona N, 1993, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computer Vision, P209
[4]  
[Anonymous], P IEEE C COMP ARCH M
[5]  
[Anonymous], OPTICAL FLOW COMPUTA
[6]  
ARTIERI A, 1989, P ICASSP, P2453
[7]   PERFORMANCE OF OPTICAL-FLOW TECHNIQUES [J].
BARRON, JL ;
FLEET, DJ ;
BEAUCHEMIN, SS .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER VISION, 1994, 12 (01) :43-77
[8]  
BOBER M, 1994, 1994 IEEE COMPUTER SOCIETY CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION, PROCEEDINGS, P947, DOI 10.1109/CVPR.1994.323931
[9]   A PARALLEL ALGORITHM FOR REAL-TIME COMPUTATION OF OPTICAL-FLOW [J].
BULTHOFF, H ;
LITTLE, J ;
POGGIO, T .
NATURE, 1989, 337 (6207) :549-553
[10]   Real-time quantized optical flow [J].
Camus, T .
REAL-TIME IMAGING, 1997, 3 (02) :71-86