Why Stop at Two Opinions? Reply to McCrae (2020)

被引:3
作者
Bleidorn, Wiebke [1 ]
Hill, Patrick L. [2 ]
Back, Mitja D. [3 ]
Denissen, Jaap J. A. [4 ]
Hennecke, Marie [5 ]
Hopwood, Christopher J. [6 ]
Jokela, Markus [7 ]
Kandler, Christian [8 ]
Lucas, Richard E. [9 ]
Luhmann, Maike [10 ]
Orth, Ulrich [11 ]
Wagner, Jenny [12 ]
Wrzus, Cornelia [13 ]
Zimmermann, Johannes [14 ]
Roberts, Brent [15 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Psychol, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[3] Westfal Wilhems Univ Munster, Dept Psychol, Munster, Germany
[4] Univ Utrecht, Dept Psychol, Utrecht, Netherlands
[5] Univ Siegen, Dept Psychol, Siegen, Germany
[6] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Psychol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[7] Univ Helsinki, Dept Psychol, Helsinki, Finland
[8] Univ Bremen, Dept Psychol, Bremen, Germany
[9] Michigan State Univ, Dept Psychol, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[10] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Dept Psychol, Bochum, Germany
[11] Univ Bern, Dept Psychol, Bern, Switzerland
[12] Univ Hamburg, Dept Psychol, Hamburg, Germany
[13] Heidelberg Univ, Dept Psychol, Heidelberg, Germany
[14] Univ Kassel, Dept Psychol, Kassel, Germany
[15] Univ Illinois, Dept Psychol, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
关键词
personality; development; longitudinal; policy; interventions;
D O I
10.1037/amp0000676
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
McCrae (2020) argues that it is premature to explore interventions focused on personality change. In his commentary, he suggests that interventions should be promoted only if their effects in self-report data are confirmed by the additional opinion of informants. We agree with the essence of his position and would go further by envisioning a new framework for rigorous collaborative research on personality change (Bleidorn et al., 2020). We nevertheless maintain that policymakers would benefit from considering the additional opinion of personality scientists.
引用
收藏
页码:731 / 732
页数:2
相关论文
共 5 条
[1]   Longitudinal Experience-Wide Association Studies-A Framework for Studying Personality Change [J].
Bleidorn, Wiebke ;
Hopwood, Christopher J. ;
Back, Mitja D. ;
Denissen, Jaap J. A. ;
Hennecke, Marie ;
Jokela, Markus ;
Kandler, Christian ;
Lucas, Richard E. ;
Luhmann, Maike ;
Orth, Ulrich ;
Roberts, Brent W. ;
Wagner, Jenny ;
Wrzus, Cornelia ;
Zimmermann, Johannes .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2020, 34 (03) :285-300
[2]   The Policy Relevance of Personality Traits [J].
Bleidorn, Wiebke ;
Hill, Patrick L. ;
Back, Mitja D. ;
Denissen, Jaap J. A. ;
Hennecke, Marie ;
Hopwood, Christopher J. ;
Jokela, Markus ;
Kandler, Christian ;
Lucas, Richard E. ;
Luhmann, Maike ;
Orth, Ulrich ;
Wagner, Jenny ;
Wrzus, Cornelia ;
Zimmermann, Johannes ;
Roberts, Brent .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2019, 74 (09) :1056-1067
[3]   Get a Second Opinion: Comment on Bleidorn et al. (2019) [J].
McCrae, Robert R. .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2020, 75 (05) :729-730
[4]   The Psychiatric GWAS Consortium: Big Science Comes to Psychiatry [J].
Sullivan, Patrick F. .
NEURON, 2010, 68 (02) :182-186
[5]  
Wagner J., CURRENT DIRECTIONS P