Paradox of mainstreaming agroecology for regional and rural food security in developing countries

被引:26
作者
Pant, Laxmi Prasad [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guelph, Ontario Agr Coll, Sch Environm Design & Rural Dev, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
关键词
Transformations; Adaptive transition cycle; Regime shifts; Agroecology; Innovation; Food security; WATER CONSERVATION TECHNIQUES; RICE INTENSIFICATION; ADAPTIVE COMANAGEMENT; INNOVATION SYSTEMS; DOMINANT LOGIC; MANAGEMENT; AGRICULTURE; TRANSITION; RESILIENCE; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2016.03.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Paradox of mainstreaming agroecology refers to an apparent contradiction between upscaling niche innovations to produce more food in sustainable ways, and the concerns for a loss of core values and principles of agroecology in the mainstreaming process. This paper examines this paradox of mainstreaming and sidestreaming (continuity of niche practises) using longitudinal case studies of agroecological innovations in soil and water conservation, crop improvement, crop intensification, and market differentiation in the regional and rural contexts of developing countries. Findings suggest that there are latent and salient paradoxes of mainstreaming niche innovations, respectively explaining cooperative and competitive interactions with the incumbent regime of industrial food and agriculture. While the former paradox involves continuity of niche practises as well as regime conditions through incremental adaptations, the latter comprises regime shifts through transformational adaptations. However, as these two paradoxes are in flux a latent paradox can become salient when competitive elements of seemingly cooperative niche-regime interactions unravel. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 316
页数:12
相关论文
共 112 条
[1]  
Adhikari B., 2013, J Geogr Nat Disast S, V5, P2167, DOI DOI 10.4172/2167-0587.S5-001
[2]  
Akram-Lodhi A.H., 2013, Hungry for Change: Farmers, Food, Justice, and the Agrarian Question
[3]   Analyzing decentralized resource regimes from a polycentric perspective [J].
Andersson, Krister P. ;
Ostrom, Elinor .
POLICY SCIENCES, 2008, 41 (01) :71-93
[4]  
[Anonymous], FARMER INNOVATION AF
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1986, The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2007, WHOCCUH Annual Report 2007, P4
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Institutions and organizations
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Applied Social Research Methods Series
[9]   SINGLE-LOOP AND DOUBLE-LOOP MODELS IN RESEARCH ON DECISION-MAKING [J].
ARGYRIS, C .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1976, 21 (03) :363-375
[10]   Induced innovation and land degradation: Results from a bioeconomic model of a village in west Africa [J].
Barbier, B .
AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1998, 19 (1-2) :15-25