What determines spatial bias in citizen science? Exploring four recording schemes with different proficiency requirements

被引:185
作者
Geldmann, Jonas [1 ]
Heilmann-Clausen, Jacob [1 ]
Holm, Thomas E. [2 ]
Levinsky, Irina [3 ]
Markussen, Bo [4 ]
Olsen, Kent [5 ]
Rahbek, Carsten [1 ,6 ]
Tottrup, Anders P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Nat Hist Museum Denmark, Ctr Macroecol Evolut & Climate, Univ Pk 15, DK-2100 Copenhagen E, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ, Dept Biosci, Grenaavej 14, DK-8410 Ronde, Denmark
[3] Dansk Ornitol Forening BirdLife Denmark, Vesterbrogade 140, DK-1620 Copenhagen V, Denmark
[4] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Math Sci, Lab Appl Stat, Univ Pk 5, DK-2100 Copenhagen E, Denmark
[5] Nat Hist Museum Aarhus, Wilhelm Meyers Alle 210, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
[6] Imperial Coll London, Silwood Pk,Buckhurst Rd, Ascot SL5 7PY, Berks, England
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
biodiversity hotspots; citizen science; conservation priority; point process model; species richness; volunteer; PREDICTING SPECIES DISTRIBUTIONS; MONITORING PROGRAMS; BIOLOGICAL RECORDS; OCCUPANCY MODELS; BIODIVERSITY; RICHNESS; BIRDS; VOLUNTEERS; ACCURACY; MATTERS;
D O I
10.1111/ddi.12477
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Aim To understand how the integration of contextual spatial data on land cover and human infrastructure can help reduce spatial bias in sampling effort, and improve the utilization of citizen science-based species recording schemes. By comparing four different citizen science projects, we explore how the sampling design's complexity affects the role of these spatial biases. Location Denmark, Europe. Methods We used a point process model to estimate the effect of land cover and human infrastructure on the intensity of observations from four different citizen science species recording schemes. We then use these results to predict areas of under-and oversampling as well as relative biodiversity 'hotspots' and 'deserts', accounting for common spatial biases introduced in unstructured sampling designs. Results We demonstrate that the explanatory power of spatial biases such as infrastructure and human population density increased as the complexity of the sampling schemes decreased. Despite a low absolute sampling effort in agricultural landscapes, these areas still appeared oversampled compared to the observed species richness. Conversely, forests and grassland appeared under-sampled despite higher absolute sampling efforts. We also present a novel and effective analytical approach to address spatial biases in unstructured sampling schemes and a new way to address such biases, when more structured sampling is not an option. Main conclusions We show that citizen science datasets, which rely on untrained amateurs, are more heavily prone to spatial biases from infrastructure and human population density. Objectives and protocols of mass-participating projects should thus be designed with this in mind. Our results suggest that, where contextual data is available, modelling the intensity of individual observation can help understand and quantify how spatial biases affect the observed biological patterns.
引用
收藏
页码:1139 / 1149
页数:11
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1974, CONDITIONAL LOGIT AN
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2016, APPL HIERARCHICAL MO
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2002, Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical informationtheoretic approach
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2016, CHAP HALL CRC INTERD
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2017, Miscellaneous functions for Grid Graphics R package gridExtra version 2.3
  • [6] [Anonymous], MONOGR POP BIOL
  • [7] Emerging technologies for biological recording
    August, Tom
    Harvey, Martin
    Lightfoot, Paula
    Kilbey, David
    Papadopoulos, Timos
    Jepson, Paul
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY, 2015, 115 (03) : 731 - 749
  • [8] spatstat: An R package for analyzing spatial point patterns
    Baddeley, A
    Turner, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2005, 12 (06): : 1 - 42
  • [9] Evaluating protected area effectiveness using bird lists in the Australian Wet Tropics
    Barnes, Megan
    Szabo, Judit K.
    Morris, William K.
    Possingham, Hugh
    [J]. DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2015, 21 (04) : 368 - 378
  • [10] Accounting for weather and time-of-day parameters when analysing count data from monitoring programs
    Bas, Yves
    Devictor, Vincent
    Moussus, Jean-Pierre
    Jiguet, Frederic
    [J]. BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2008, 17 (14) : 3403 - 3416