Preferences for Economic and Environmental Goals in Rural Community Development in the Western United States

被引:5
作者
Ulrich-Schad, Jessica D. [1 ]
Jakus, Paul M. [2 ]
Bordigioni, Malieka [3 ]
Albrecht, Don E. [4 ]
机构
[1] Utah State Univ, Dept Sociol & Anthropol, 0780 Old Main Hill,Room 216C, Logan, UT 84322 USA
[2] Utah State Univ, Dept Appl Econ, Logan, UT 84322 USA
[3] Univ Nevada, Dept Econ, Reno, NV 89557 USA
[4] Utah State Univ, Western Rural Dev Ctr, Logan, UT 84322 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
RESIDENTS ATTITUDES; LAND-USE; PLACE; POPULATION; TOURISM; IMPACTS; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1111/ruso.12429
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
Rural residents in the United States do not always agree on local development priorities, yet understanding and accounting for their preferences is a step towards more effective and equitable community development. We use survey data spanning different types of rural Intermountain West communities to gauge residents' preference weights for economic and environmental rural development goals. Given that community tenure and age are often related to development preferences, respondents are divided into three groups based on these factors using a classification tree approach. Long-term residents (>36 percent of life spent in the community) have the strongest economic preferences, while older newcomers have the strongest environmental preferences. The Leti heterogeneity index reveals that long-term residents also displayed the greatest homogeneity of preferences. Ordered probit analysis shows that goal preferences are also related to sex, education, household income, community financial security, and the share of county income derived from wealth assets. These findings provide a more nuanced and methods-based understanding of residential tenure in a community and its relationship to development attitudes across a variety of rural place types, all valuable information for rural community and economic development practitioners.
引用
收藏
页码:605 / 641
页数:37
相关论文
共 58 条
  • [1] Albrecht D., 2014, RETHINKING RURAL
  • [2] Understanding Local Environmental Concern: The Importance of Place
    Armstrong, Andrea
    Stedman, Richard C.
    [J]. RURAL SOCIOLOGY, 2019, 84 (01) : 93 - 122
  • [3] Blahna DaleJ., 1990, Community and Forestry: Continuities in the Sociology of Natural Resources, P159
  • [4] Interpreting amenities, envisioning the future: Common ground and conflict in North Carolina's rural coastal communities
    Noëlle Boucquey
    Lisa M. Campbell
    Gabriel Cumming
    Zoë A. Meletis
    Carla Norwood
    Joshua Stoll
    [J]. GeoJournal, 2012, 77 (1) : 83 - 101
  • [5] Environmental concern in the Mormon culture region
    Brehm, JM
    Eisenhauer, BW
    [J]. SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2006, 19 (05) : 393 - 410
  • [6] Community attachments as predictors of local environmental concern - The case for multiple dimensions of attachment
    Brehm, Joan M.
    Eisenhauer, Brian W.
    Krannich, Richard S.
    [J]. AMERICAN BEHAVIORAL SCIENTIST, 2006, 50 (02) : 142 - 165
  • [7] Brown DavidL., 2008, RURAL RETIREMENT MIG
  • [8] Burnham K. P., 2002, MODEL SELECTION MULT
  • [9] The Rural Problem: Justice in the Countryside
    Carolan, Michael
    [J]. RURAL SOCIOLOGY, 2020, 85 (01) : 22 - 56
  • [10] Carr P.J., 2009, HOLLOWING OUT MIDDLE