The Comparative Effects of Azilsartan Medoxomil and Olmesartan on Ambulatory and Clinic Blood Pressure

被引:112
|
作者
Bakris, George L. [1 ]
Sica, Domenic [2 ]
Weber, Michael [3 ]
White, William B. [4 ]
Roberts, Andrew [5 ]
Perez, Alfonso [5 ]
Cao, Charlie [5 ]
Kupfer, Stuart [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Pritzker Sch Med, Hypertens Dis Unit, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Med, Richmond, VA 23298 USA
[3] SUNY Downstate, Dept Med, Brooklyn, NY USA
[4] Univ Connecticut, Hypertens Ctr, Farmington, CT USA
[5] Takeda Global Res & Dev Ctr Inc, Deerfield, IL USA
关键词
CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS; HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS; HEART-FAILURE; TRIAL; DISEASE; CAPTOPRIL; LOSARTAN; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1111/j.1751-7176.2010.00425.x
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
The current study assesses the antihypertensive efficacy and safety of the investigational angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), azilsartan medoxomil (AZL-M), compared with placebo and the ARB olmesartan medoxomil (OLM-M). This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study assessed change from baseline in mean 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure (SBP) following 6 weeks of treatment. Patients with primary hypertension (n=1275) and baseline 24-hour mean ambulatory systolic pressure >= 130 mm Hg and < 170 mm Hg were studied; 142 received placebo and the remainder received 20 mg, 40 mg, or 80 mg AZL-M or 40 mg OLM-M. Mean age of participants was 58 +/- 11 years, baseline mean 24-hour SBP was 146 mm Hg. Dose-dependent reductions in 24-hour mean SBP at study end occurred in all AZL-M groups. Reduction in 24-hour mean SBP was greater with AZL-M 80 mg than OLM-M 40 mg by 2.1 mm Hg (95% confidence interval, -4.0 to -0.1; P=.038), while AZL-M 40 mg was noninferior to OLM-M 40 mg. The side effect profiles of both ARBs were similar to placebo. AZL-M is well tolerated and more efficacious at its maximal dose than the highest dose of OLM-M. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2011;13:81-88. (C)2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 88
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of azilsartan medoxomil compared with olmesartan and valsartan on ambulatory and clinic blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes and prediabetes
    White, William B.
    Cuadra, Rene H.
    Lloyd, Eric
    Bakris, George L.
    Kupfer, Stuart
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2016, 34 (04) : 788 - 797
  • [2] Effects of the Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Azilsartan Medoxomil Versus Olmesartan and Valsartan on Ambulatory and Clinic Blood Pressure in Patients With Stages 1 and 2 Hypertension
    White, William B.
    Weber, Michael A.
    Sica, Domenic
    Bakris, George L.
    Perez, Alfonso
    Cao, Charlie
    Kupfer, Stuart
    HYPERTENSION, 2011, 57 (03) : 413 - U150
  • [3] Clinical effects of combined olmesartan medoxomil and amlodipine on clinic and ambulatory blood pressure in elderly patients with resistant hypertension
    Ding, Shunjing
    Liu, Jin
    Fu, Qiang
    Zheng, Ying
    ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS, 2013, 57 (03) : 423 - 427
  • [4] Comparison of the Novel Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker Azilsartan Medoxomil vs Valsartan by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring
    Sica, Domenic
    White, William B.
    Weber, Michael A.
    Bakris, George L.
    Perez, Alfonso
    Cao, Charlie
    Handley, Alison
    Kupfer, Stuart
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION, 2011, 13 (07) : 467 - 472
  • [5] Antihypertensive efficacy of olmesartan medoxomil and candesartan cilexetil in achieving 24-hour blood pressure reductions and ambulatory blood pressure goals
    Brunner, Hans R.
    Arakawa, Kikuo
    CARDIOVASCULAR THERAPY AND PREVENTION, 2011, 10 (03): : 22 - 27
  • [6] Long-term efficacy and tolerability of azilsartan medoxomil/chlorthalidone vs olmesartan medoxomil/hydrochlorothiazide in chronic kidney disease
    Bakris, George L.
    Zhao, Lin
    Kupfer, Stuart
    Juhasz, Attila
    Hisada, Michie
    Lloyd, Eric
    Oparil, Suzanne
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION, 2018, 20 (04) : 694 - 702
  • [7] Olmesartan Medoxomil-Based Antihypertensive Therapy Evaluated by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Efficacy in High-Risk Patient Subgroups
    Chrysant, Steven G.
    Germino, F. Wilford
    Neutel, Joel M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR DRUGS, 2012, 12 (06) : 375 - 389
  • [8] Ambulatory blood pressure is superior to clinic blood pressure in relation to ischemic stroke in both diabetic and nondiabetic patients
    Cai, Anping
    Liu, Chaofan
    Zhou, Dan
    Liu, Xiaoqi
    Zhong, Qi
    Li, Xida
    Huang, Yuqing
    Feng, Yingqing
    Zhou, Yingling
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2017, 22 (06) : 314 - 321
  • [9] Effects of combining azilsartan medoxomil with amlodipine in patients with stage 2 hypertension
    Weber, Michael A.
    White, William B.
    Sica, Domenic
    Bakris, George L.
    Cao, Charlie
    Roberts, Andrew
    Kupfer, Stuart
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2014, 19 (02) : 90 - 97
  • [10] Clinic Versus Daytime Ambulatory Blood Pressure Difference in Hypertensive Patients The Impact of Age and Clinic Blood Pressure
    Banegas, Jose R.
    Ruilope, Luis M.
    de la Sierra, Alejandro
    Vinyoles, Ernest
    Gorostidi, Manuel
    de la Cruz, Juan J.
    Segura, Julian
    Oliveras, Anna
    Martell, Nieves
    Garcia-Puig, Juan
    Williams, Bryan
    HYPERTENSION, 2017, 69 (02) : 211 - +