Viability assessment using fluorescent markers and ultrastructure of human biopsied embryos vitrified in open and closed systems

Research question: Are there any differences in viability and ultrastructure amongst embryos biopsied on Day 5 versus Day 3 following vitrification in open and closed systems and compared to fresh embryos? Design: One hundred human embryos (40 blastocysts biopsied on Day 5 and subsequently vitrified in open or closed systems and 60 Day 3 biopsied embryos that developed to blastocysts but were rejected for transfer following preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic/single gene defects and for aneuploidies were either treated fresh [n = 20] or vitrified [n = 40] in open or closed systems) and following warming and culture for 4 h were subjected to viability staining with carboxyfluorescein-diacetate succinimidylester/propidium iodide or processed for transmission electron microscopy. Results: No statistically significant differences were observed in the viability of human biopsied embryos following vitrification in open and closed systems. Compared to fresh embryos, vitrified ones had a higher incidence of damage (propidium iodide-stained cells) irrespective of the vitrification method (P = 0.005). These damaged cells were more prominent in Day 5 biopsied blastocysts and mainly located at the position of cutting. Characteristic lipofuscin droplets (representative of apoptosis) and a higher number of vacuoles and distension of mitochondria were also more evident in vitrified embryos, although this was not statistically assessed. Conclusions: Vitrification in open and closed systems does not adversely affect the viability and ultrastructure of Day 5 and Day 3 biopsied embryos as revealed by the minimal yet statistically significant cell damage observed. This damage may be compensated by the embryos, which in their attempt to fully recover following vitrification, potentially enable 'rescue' processes to eliminate it.