Transition From Film to Digital Mammography Impact for Breast Cancer Screening Through the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program

被引:16
作者
van Ravesteyn, Nicolien T. [1 ]
van Lier, Lisanne [1 ,2 ]
Schechter, Clyde B. [3 ,4 ]
Ekwueme, Donatus U. [5 ]
Royalty, Janet [5 ]
Miller, Jacqueline W. [5 ]
Near, Aimee M. [6 ]
Cronin, Kathleen A. [7 ]
Heijnsdijk, Eveline A. M. [1 ]
Mandelblatt, Jeanne S. [6 ]
de Koning, Harry J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr, Erasmus MC, Dept Publ Hlth, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Gen Practice & Elderly Care Med, Med Ctr, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Family & Social Med, Bronx, NY USA
[4] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Epidemiol & Populat Hlth, Bronx, NY USA
[5] CDC, Atlanta, GA 30333 USA
[6] Georgetown Univ, Lombardi Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Oncol, Washington, DC USA
[7] NCI, Stat Res & Applicat Branch, Div Canc Control & Populat Sci, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
关键词
COST-EFFECTIVENESS; INSURANCE STATUS; PERFORMANCE; BENEFITS; WOMEN; RACE; CONSEQUENCES; MORTALITY; DENSITY; INCOME;
D O I
10.1016/j.amepre.2014.11.010
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction: The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP) provides mammograms and diagnostic services for low-income, uninsured women aged 40-64 years. Mammography facilities within the NBCCEDP gradually shifted from plain-film to digital mammography. The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of replacing film with digital mammography on health effects (deaths averted, life-years gained [LYG]); costs (for screening and diagnostics); and number of women reached. Methods: NBCCEDP 2010 data and data representative of the program's target population were used in two established microsimulation models. Models simulated observed screening behavior including different screening intervals (annual, biennial, irregular) and starting ages (40, 50 years) for white, black, and Hispanic women. Model runs were performed in 2012. Results: The models predicted 8.0-8.3 LYG per 1,000 film screens for black women, 5.9-7.5 for white women, and 4.0-4.5 for Hispanic women. For all race/ethnicity groups, digital mammography had more LYG than film mammography (2%-4%), but had higher costs (34%-35%). Assuming a fixed budget, 25%-26% fewer women could be served, resulting in 22%-24% fewer LYG if all mammograms were converted to digital. The loss in LYG could be reversed to an 8%-13% increase by only including biennial screening. Conclusions: Digital could result in slightly more LYG than film mammography. However, with a fixed budget, fewer women may be served with fewer LYG. Changes in the program, such as only including biennial screening, will increase LYG/screen and could offset the potential decrease in LYG when shifting to digital mammography. (C) 2015 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:535 / 542
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Breast cancer screening in women with and without implants: retrospective study comparing digital mammography to digital mammography combined with digital breast tomosynthesis [J].
Cohen, Ethan O. ;
Perry, Rachel E. ;
Tso, Hilda H. ;
Phalak, Kanchan A. ;
Lesslie, Michele D. ;
Gerlach, Karen E. ;
Sun, Jia ;
Srinivasan, Ashmitha ;
Leung, Jessica W. T. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2021, 31 (12) :9499-9510
[42]   Risk factors for interval breast cancer: insights from a decade of a mammography screening program [J].
Subelack, Jonas ;
Morant, Rudolf ;
Blum, Marcel ;
Eichenberger, Alena ;
Geissler, Alexander ;
Ehlig, David .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2025, 211 (01) :23-33
[43]   Breast Cancer Screening with Mammography [J].
Hirsch, Bradford R. ;
Lyman, Gary H. .
CURRENT ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2011, 13 (01) :63-70
[44]   Eligibility for and reach of the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 2018-2021 [J].
Tangka, Florence K. L. ;
Kenney, Kristy ;
Miller, Jacqueline ;
Howard, David H. .
CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2025, 36 (05) :531-538
[45]   The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program in the Era of Health Reform: A Vision Forward [J].
Plescia, Marcus ;
Wong, Faye L. ;
Pieters, Jennifer ;
Joseph, Djenaba .
CANCER, 2014, 120 (16) :2620-2624
[46]   Impact of artificial intelligence in breast cancer screening with mammography [J].
Lan-Anh Dang ;
Chazard, Emmanuel ;
Poncelet, Edouard ;
Serb, Teodora ;
Rusu, Aniela ;
Pauwels, Xavier ;
Parsy, Clemence ;
Poclet, Thibault ;
Cauliez, Hugo ;
Engelaere, Constance ;
Ramette, Guillaume ;
Brienne, Charlotte ;
Dujardin, Sofiane ;
Laurent, Nicolas .
BREAST CANCER, 2022, 29 (06) :967-977
[47]   Screening Mammography and Breast Cancer Reduction: Examining the Evidence [J].
Tupper, Ruth ;
Holm, Karyn .
JNP-JOURNAL FOR NURSE PRACTITIONERS, 2014, 10 (09) :117-124
[48]   Double reading of automated breast ultrasound with digital mammography or digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer screening [J].
Lee, Janie M. ;
Partridge, Savannah C. ;
Liao, Geraldine J. ;
Hippe, Daniel S. ;
Kim, Adrienne E. ;
Lee, Christoph, I ;
Rahbar, Habib ;
Scheel, John R. ;
Lehman, Constance D. .
CLINICAL IMAGING, 2019, 55 :119-125
[49]   Beyond Mammography: New Frontiers in Breast Cancer Screening [J].
Drukteinis, Jennifer S. ;
Mooney, Blaise P. ;
Flowers, Chris I. ;
Gatenby, Robert A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2013, 126 (06) :472-479
[50]   Breast cancer subtype and screening sensitivity in the Quebec Mammography Screening Program [J].
Perron, Linda ;
Chang, Sue-Ling ;
Daigle, Jean-Marc ;
Vandal, Nathalie ;
Theberge, Isabelle ;
Diorio, Caroline ;
Lemieux, Julie ;
Pelletier, Eric ;
Brisson, Jacques .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2019, 26 (03) :154-161