Quantitative Analysis of Magnesium in Soil by Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Coupled with Nonlinear Multivariate Calibration

被引:23
作者
Yongcheng, J. [1 ,2 ]
Wen, S. [1 ]
Baohua, Z. [3 ]
Dong, L. [3 ]
机构
[1] Anhui Univ, Sch Elect Engn & Automat, Hefei 230601, Anhui, Peoples R China
[2] Hefei Univ Technol, Sch Mech & Automot Engn, Hefei 230009, Anhui, Peoples R China
[3] Anhui Univ, Sch Elect & Informat Engn, Hefei 230601, Anhui, Peoples R China
关键词
laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy; soil; magnesium; nonlinear multivariate calibration; RARE-EARTH-ELEMENTS; SAMPLES; LIBS; QUANTIFICATION; DIAGNOSIS; METALS;
D O I
10.1007/s10812-017-0537-9
中图分类号
O433 [光谱学];
学科分类号
0703 ; 070302 ;
摘要
Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) coupled with the nonlinear multivariate regression method was applied to analyze magnesium (Mg) contents in soil. The plasma was generated using a 100 mJ Nd:YAG pulsed laser, and the spectra were acquired using a multi-channel spectrometer integrated with a CCD detector. The line at 383.8 nm was selected as the analysis line for Mg. The calibration model between the intensity of characteristic line and the concentration of Mg was constructed. The traditional calibration curve showed that the concentration of Mg was not only related to the line intensity of itself, but also to other elements in soil. The intensity of characteristic lines for Mg (Mg I 383.8 nm), manganese (Mn) (Mn I 403.1 nm), and iron (Fe) (Fe I 407.2 nm) were used as input data for nonlinear multivariate calculation. According to the results of nonlinear regression, the ternary nonlinear regression was the most appropriate of the studied models. A good agreement was observed between the actual concentration provided by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and the predicted value obtained using the nonlinear multivariate regression model. The correlation coefficient between predicted concentration and the measured value was 0.987, while the root mean square error of calibration (RMSEC) and root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) were reduced to 0.017% and 0.014%, respectively. The ratio of the standard deviation of the validation to the RMSEP increased to 8.79, and the relative error was below 1.21% for nine validation samples. This indicated that the multivariate model can obtain better predicted accuracy than the calibration curve. These results also suggest that the LIBS technique is a powerful tool for analyzing the micro-nutrient elements in soil by selecting calibration and validation samples with similar matrix composition.
引用
收藏
页码:731 / 737
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Compositional analysis of soil using calibration-free laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy
    Israr, Muhammad Aamir
    Abbas, Qamar
    Haq, Sami-ul
    Nadeem, Ali
    SPECTROSCOPY LETTERS, 2022, 55 (05) : 350 - 361
  • [22] Towards quantitative laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy analysis of soil samples
    Bousquet, B.
    Sirven, J. -B.
    Canioni, L.
    SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA PART B-ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY, 2007, 62 (12) : 1582 - 1589
  • [23] Calibration standards for Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy analysis of asphalts
    Hrdlicka, Ales
    Hegrova, Jitka
    Havrlova, Eva
    Prochazka, David
    Novotny, Jan
    Novotny, Karel
    Porizka, Pavel
    Kanicky, Viktor
    Kaiser, Jozef
    Kovalova, Dasa
    Licbinsky, Roman
    SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA PART B-ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY, 2020, 170
  • [24] About the use of inverse calibration in laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy quantitative analysis
    Poggialini, Francesco
    Campanella, Beatrice
    Legnaioli, Stefano
    Raneri, Simona
    Palleschi, Vincenzo
    SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA PART B-ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY, 2020, 170
  • [25] Analysis of Minerals and Rocks by Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy
    Diaz Pace, Diego M.
    Gabriele, Norberto A.
    Garcimuno, Mayra
    D'Angelo, Cristian A.
    Bertuccelli, Graciela
    Bertuccelli, Daniela
    SPECTROSCOPY LETTERS, 2011, 44 (06) : 399 - 411
  • [26] Quantitative elemental analysis of steel using calibration-free laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy
    Shah, M. L.
    Pulhani, A. K.
    Gupta, G. P.
    Suri, B. M.
    APPLIED OPTICS, 2012, 51 (20) : 4612 - 4621
  • [27] Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Online Quantitative Analysis for Laser Processing
    Zhao, Tianzhuo
    Zhong, Qixiu
    Nie, Shuzhen
    Liu, Xiaolong
    Xiao, Hong
    Yin, Chenxuan
    Zhong, Fanghui
    Ke, Yachen
    Li, Fei
    ADVANCED PHOTONICS RESEARCH, 2024, 5 (07):
  • [28] Feasibility of Quantitative Analysis of Magnesium and Calcium in Edible Salts Using a Simple Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Device
    Kim, Hyang
    Jeon, Yoonji
    Lee, Won Bae
    Nam, Sang-Ho
    Han, Song-Hee
    Ham, Kyung-Sik
    Singh, Vivek K.
    Lee, Yonghoon
    APPLIED SPECTROSCOPY, 2019, 73 (10) : 1172 - 1182
  • [29] Calculations of and effects on quantitative limits for multivariate analyses of geological materials with laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy
    Ytsma, Cai R.
    Dyar, M. Darby
    SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA PART B-ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY, 2022, 191
  • [30] Quantitative determination of calcium, magnesium, and zinc in fingernails by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy
    Rusak, David A.
    Zeleniak, Ann E.
    Obuhosky, Jillian L.
    Holdren, Scott M.
    Noldy, Craig A.
    TALANTA, 2013, 117 : 55 - 59