Systematic review of the efficacy and safety of using mesh in surgery for uterine or vaginal vault prolapse

被引:67
作者
Jia, Xueli [1 ]
Glazener, Cathryn [1 ]
Mowatt, Graham [1 ]
Jenkinson, David [1 ]
Fraser, Cynthia [1 ]
Bain, Christine [2 ]
Burr, Jennifer [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aberdeen, Hlth Serv Res Unit, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, Scotland
[2] Aberdeen Royal Infirm, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, Scotland
关键词
Efficacy; Mesh; Mesh erosion; NICE; Pelvic organ prolapsed; Safety; Systematic review; ABDOMINAL SACRAL COLPOPEXY; POSTERIOR INTRAVAGINAL SLINGPLASTY; INFRACOCCYGEAL SACROPEXY; SYNTHETIC MESH; SACROSPINOUS COLPOPEXY; UTEROVAGINAL PROLAPSE; GENITAL PROLAPSE; SACROCOLPOPEXY; COLPOSACROPEXY; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s00192-010-1156-7
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Introduction and hypothesis The aim of this study is to estimate efficacy and safety of mesh in surgery for uterine or vault prolapse Methods Seventeen electronic databases were searched for relevant studies that were published from 1980 onwards Results Fifty-four studies involving 7,054 women were included. For sacrocolpopexy (average follow-up 23 months), the risk of clinical recurrence ranged from 0% to 6%, persistent symptoms ranged from 3% to 31% and mesh erosion from 0% to 12%. For infracoccygeal sacropexy (average follow-up 13 months), the risk of clinical recurrence ranged from 0% to 25%, persistent symptoms from 2% to 21% and mesh erosion 0% to 21%. Limited evidence was available for sacrocolpopenneopexy and uterine suspension sling to draw reliable estimates Conclusions Sacrocolpopexy was associated with a low risk of recurrence but with a relatively high risk of mesh erosion Ranges of estimates for outcomes for other mesh techniques were wide
引用
收藏
页码:1413 / 1431
页数:19
相关论文
共 74 条
  • [21] The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions
    Downs, SH
    Black, N
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 1998, 52 (06) : 377 - 384
  • [22] Abdominal sacrocolpopexy for vault prolapse without burial of mesh: a case series
    Elneil, S
    Cutner, AS
    Remy, M
    Leather, AT
    Toozs-Hobson, P
    Wise, B
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2005, 112 (04) : 486 - 489
  • [23] Farnsworth BN, 2002, INT UROGYNECOL J PEL, V13, P4
  • [24] TOTAL ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMY AT ABDOMINAL SACROVAGINOPEXY - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY
    FEDORKOW, DM
    KALBFLEISCH, RE
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1993, 169 (03) : 641 - 643
  • [25] Infracoccygeal sacropexy
    Foote, Andrew J.
    Ralph, Jennifer
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2007, 47 (03) : 250 - 251
  • [26] FREEMAN R, LAS STUDY RANDOMISED
  • [27] GANNON NA, 2005, TREATMENT STRESS MIX
  • [28] Posterior intravaginal slingplasty (infracoccygeal sacropexy) in the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse
    Ghanbari, Z.
    baratali, B. H.
    Mireshghi, M. S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2006, 94 (02) : 147 - 148
  • [29] High complication rate identified in sacrocolpopexy patients attributed to silicone mesh
    Govier, FE
    Kobashi, KC
    Kozlowski, PM
    Kuznetsov, DD
    Begley, SJ
    McGonigle, KF
    Muntz, HG
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2005, 65 (06) : 1099 - 1103
  • [30] Surgical outcome of abdominal sacrocolpopexy with synthetic mesh versus abdominal sacrocolpopexy with cadaveric fascia lata
    Gregory, WT
    Otto, LN
    Bergstrom, JO
    Clark, AL
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2005, 16 (05) : 369 - 374