Structure and bias in the network autocorrelation model

被引:33
作者
Neuman, Eric J. [1 ]
Mizruchi, Mark S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Business Adm, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Sociol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Network autocorrelation model; Density; Simulation; SOCIAL-INFLUENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.socnet.2010.04.003
中图分类号
Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
030303 ;
摘要
In a recent paper (Mizruchi and Neuman, 2008), we showed that estimates of rho in the network autocorrelation model exhibited a systematic negative bias and that the magnitude of this bias increased monotonically with increases in network density. We showed that this bias held regardless of the size of the network, the number of exogenous variables in the model, and whether the matrix W was normalized or in raw form. The networks in our simulations were random, however, which raises the question of the extent to which the negative bias holds in various structured networks. In this paper, we reproduce the simulations from our earlier paper on a series of networks drawn to represent well-known structures, including star, caveman, and small-world structures. Results from these simulations indicate that the pattern of negative bias in rho continues to hold in all of these structures and that the negative bias continues to increase at increasing levels of density. Interestingly, the negative bias in rho is especially pronounced at extremely low-density levels in the star network. We conclude by discussing the implications of these findings. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:290 / 300
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The network autocorrelation model using two-mode data: Affiliation exposure and potential bias in the autocorrelation parameter
    Fujimoto, Kayo
    Chou, Chih-Ping
    Valente, Thomas W.
    SOCIAL NETWORKS, 2011, 33 (03) : 231 - 243
  • [2] The effect of density on the level of bias in the network autocorrelation model
    Mizruchi, Mark S.
    Neuman, Eric J.
    SOCIAL NETWORKS, 2008, 30 (03) : 190 - 200
  • [3] Bayesian estimation of the network autocorrelation model
    Dittrich, Dino
    Leenders, Roger Th. A. J.
    Mulder, Joris
    SOCIAL NETWORKS, 2017, 48 : 213 - 236
  • [4] Statistical power of the social network autocorrelation model
    Wang, Wei
    Neuman, Eric J.
    Newman, Daniel A.
    SOCIAL NETWORKS, 2014, 38 : 88 - 99
  • [5] A perturbative solution to the linear influence/network autocorrelation model under network dynamics
    Butts, Carter T.
    JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL SOCIOLOGY, 2025,
  • [6] Finite Sample Behavior of MLE in Network Autocorrelation Models
    La Rocca, Michele
    Porzio, Giovanni C.
    Vitale, Maria Prosperina
    Doreian, Patrick
    CLASSIFICATION, (BIG) DATA ANALYSIS AND STATISTICAL LEARNING, 2018, : 43 - 50
  • [7] A comparison of estimators for the network autocorrelation model based on observed social networks
    Li, Haomin
    Sewell, Daniel K.
    SOCIAL NETWORKS, 2021, 66 : 202 - 210
  • [8] A comprehensive analysis of autocorrelation and bias in home range estimation
    Noonan, Michael J.
    Tucker, Marlee A.
    Fleming, Christen H.
    Akre, Thomas S.
    Alberts, Susan C.
    Ali, Abdullahi H.
    Altmann, Jeanne
    Antunes, Pamela Castro
    Belant, Jerrold L.
    Beyer, Dean
    Blaum, Niels
    Boehning-Gaese, Katrin
    Cullen Jr, Laury
    de Paula, Rogerio Cunha
    Dekker, Jasja
    Drescher-Lehman, Jonathan
    Farwig, Nina
    Fichtel, Claudia
    Fischer, Christina
    Ford, Adam T.
    Goheen, Jacob R.
    Janssen, Rene
    Jeltsch, Florian
    Kauffman, Matthew
    Kappeler, Peter M.
    Koch, Flavia
    LaPoint, Scott
    Markham, A. Catherine
    Medici, Emilia Patricia
    Morato, Ronaldo G.
    Nathan, Ran
    Oliveira-Santos, Luiz Gustavo R.
    Olson, Kirk A.
    Patterson, Bruce D.
    Paviolo, Agustin
    Ramalho, Emiliano Estero
    Rosner, Sascha
    Schabo, Dana G.
    Selva, Nuria
    Sergiel, Agnieszka
    da Silva, Marina Xavier
    Spiegel, Orr
    Thompson, Peter
    Ullmann, Wiebke
    Zieba, Filip
    Zwijacz-Kozica, Tomasz
    Fagan, William F.
    Mueller, Thomas
    Calabrese, Justin M.
    ECOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS, 2019, 89 (02)
  • [9] BIAS IN GENETIC VARIANCE ESTIMATES DUE TO SPATIAL AUTOCORRELATION
    MAGNUSSEN, S
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 1993, 86 (2-3) : 349 - 355
  • [10] Network autocorrelation models with egocentric data
    Sewell, Daniel K.
    SOCIAL NETWORKS, 2017, 49 : 113 - 123