Relative efficacy and tolerability of etoricoxib, celecoxib, and naproxen in the treatment of osteoarthritis A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials based on patient withdrawal

被引:0
作者
Song, Gwan Gyu [1 ]
Seo, Young Ho [1 ]
Kim, Jae-Hoon [1 ]
Choi, Sung Jae [1 ]
Ji, Jong Dae [1 ]
Lee, Young Ho [1 ]
机构
[1] Korea Univ, Coll Med, Anam Hosp, Div Rheumatol,Dept Internal Med, 73 Inchon Ro, Seoul 136705, South Korea
来源
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR RHEUMATOLOGIE | 2016年 / 75卷 / 05期
关键词
Etoricoxib; Celecoxib; Naproxen; Osteoarthritis; Meta-analysis; NONSTEROIDAL ANTIINFLAMMATORY DRUGS; MODIFYING ANTIRHEUMATIC DRUGS; DOUBLE-BLIND; RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS; CLINICAL-TRIALS; TOXICITY; QUALITY; SAFETY; PLACEBO; NSAIDS;
D O I
10.1007/s00393-015-0023-9
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
This study aimed to assess the relative efficacy and tolerability of etoricoxib, celecoxib, and naproxen at recommended dosages in patients with osteoarthritis (OA). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the efficacy and tolerability of etoricoxib 30-60 mg, celecoxib 200-400 mg, and naproxen 1000 mg, based on the number of patient withdrawals among those with OA, were included in this network meta-analysis. We performed a Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis to combine direct and indirect evidence from the RCTs. Eight RCTs, including 5,942 patients, met the inclusion criteria. The proportion of patient withdrawals due to lack of efficacy was significantly lower in the etoricoxib 30-60 mg (OR 0.21, 95 % CrI 0.12-0.38), celecoxib 200-400 mg (OR 0.29, 95 % CrI 0.18-0.47), and naproxen 1000 mg (OR 0.31, 95 % CrI 0.18-0.51) groups than in the placebo group. The number of patient withdrawals due to lack of efficacy tended to be lower in the etoricoxib 30-60 mg group than in the naproxen 1000 mg and celecoxib 200-400 mg groups, although they did not reach statistical significance (OR 0.68, 95 % CrI 0.36-1.33 and OR 0.70, 95 % CrI 0.38-1.37, respectively). Ranking probabilities based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) indicated that etoricoxib 30-60 mg had the highest probability of being the best treatment based on the number of withdrawals due to lack of efficacy (SUCRA = 0.9168) followed by celecoxib 200-400 mg (SUCRA = 0.5659), naproxen 1000 mg (SUCRA = 0.5171), and placebo (SUCRA = 0.000189). With respect to tolerability, the number of withdrawals due to adverse events was not significantly different among etoricoxib, celecoxib, naproxen, and placebo, although it tended to be lower with etoricoxib and placebo. Etoricoxib 30-60 mg, celecoxib 200-400 mg, and naproxen 1000 mg were more efficacious than placebo. However, there was no significant difference in efficacy and tolerability between the medications.
引用
收藏
页码:508 / 516
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials - The CONSORT statement
    Begg, C
    Cho, M
    Eastwood, S
    Horton, R
    Moher, D
    Olkin, I
    Pitkin, R
    Rennie, D
    Schulz, KF
    Simel, D
    Stroup, DF
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 276 (08): : 637 - 639
  • [2] Treatment of osteoarthritis with celecoxib, a cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor: A randomized controlled trial
    Bensen, WG
    Fiechtner, JJ
    McMillen, JI
    Zhao, WW
    Yu, SS
    Woods, EM
    Hubbard, RC
    Isakson, PC
    Verburg, KM
    Geis, GS
    [J]. MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 1999, 74 (11) : 1095 - 1105
  • [3] Efficacy and safety of etoricoxib 30 mg and celecoxib 200 mg in the treatment of osteoarthritis in two identically designed, randomized, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority studies
    Bingham, C. O., III
    Sebba, A. I.
    Rubin, B. R.
    Ruoff, G. E.
    Kremer, J.
    Bird, S.
    Smugar, S. S.
    Fitzgerald, B. J.
    O'Brien, K.
    Tershakovec, A. M.
    [J]. RHEUMATOLOGY, 2007, 46 (03) : 496 - 507
  • [4] A microsoft-excel-based tool for running and critically appraising network meta-analyses-an overview and application of NetMetaXL
    Brown S.
    Hutton B.
    Clifford T.
    Coyle D.
    Grima D.
    Wells G.
    Cameron C.
    [J]. Systematic Reviews, 3 (1)
  • [5] Simultaneous comparison of multiple treatments: combining direct and indirect evidence
    Caldwell, DM
    Ades, AE
    Higgins, JPT
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 331 (7521): : 897 - 900
  • [6] Network meta-analysis for comparing treatment effects of multiple interventions: an introduction
    Catala-Lopez, Ferran
    Tobias, Aurelio
    Cameron, Chris
    Moher, David
    Hutton, Brian
    [J]. RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 34 (11) : 1489 - 1496
  • [7] A meta-analysis of the efficacy and toxicity of combining disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis based on patient withdrawal
    Choy, EHS
    Smith, C
    Doré, CJ
    Scott, DL
    [J]. RHEUMATOLOGY, 2005, 44 (11) : 1414 - 1421
  • [8] Etoricoxib in the treatment of osteoarthritis over 52-weeks: a double-blind, active-comparator controlled trial [NCT00242489]
    Curtis, SP
    Bockow, B
    Fisher, C
    Olaleye, J
    Compton, A
    Ko, AT
    Reicin, AS
    [J]. BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2005, 6 (1)
  • [9] Pathogenesis and management of pain in osteoarthritis
    Dieppe, PA
    Lohmander, LS
    [J]. LANCET, 2005, 365 (9463) : 965 - 973
  • [10] Efficacy and Tolerability of Celecoxib versus Naproxen in Patients with Osteoarthritis of the Knee: a Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy Trial
    Essex, M. N.
    Bhadra, P.
    Sands, G. H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2012, 40 (04) : 1357 - 1370