Frequency and Cancer Yield of BI-RADS Category 3 Lesions Detected at High-Risk Screening Breast MRI

被引:18
作者
Edmonds, Christine E. [1 ]
Lamb, Leslie R. [1 ]
Mercaldo, Sarah F. [1 ]
Sippo, Dorothy A. [1 ]
Burk, Kristine S. [1 ]
Lehman, Constance D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Avon Comprehens Breast Evaluat Ctr, Dept Radiol, Wang Ambulatory Care Bldg,Ste 240,15 Parkman St, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
BI RADS 3; breast cancer screening; breast MRI; probably benign; PROBABLY BENIGN LESIONS; MAMMOGRAPHIC FOLLOW-UP; RESONANCE-IMAGING USE; SOCIETY GUIDELINES; MALIGNANCY; WOMEN; RECOMMENDATIONS; ASSESSMENTS; US;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.19.21778
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the frequency and cancer yield of BI-RADS category 3 lesions in baseline versus nonbaseline (those with at least one prior) MRI screening examinations. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Consecutive MRI screening examinations performed from 2011 through 2015 were reviewed. Pearson and Wilcoxon tests were used to examine differences in age, breast density, screening indication, background parenchymal enhancement, and cancer yield between baseline and nonbaseline MRI BI-RADS category 3 assessments. Multivariate logistic regression models based on generalized estimating equations were used to assess the odds of receiving a BI-RADS 3 assessment as a function of the variables. RESULTS. Of 6672 MRI screening examinations of 3214 patients, 202 examinations (3%) were assessed BI-RADS category 3. Among baseline examinations, 8% (82/983) were assessed BI-RADS 3, compared with 2% (120/5689) of nonbaseline examinations (p < 0.001). Among the total BI-RADS 3 examinations, 6% (13/202) yielded malignancy of the lesion that had been assessed BI-RADS 3; 12 of 13 cancers were stage 0 or I at diagnosis. The cancer yield of BI-RADS 3 at baseline examinations was 2% (2/82), compared with 9% (11/120) for nonbaseline examinations (p = 0.056). Ten of 13 examinations were upgraded at or before 6-month follow-up MRI. CONCLUSION. Baseline screening breast MRI examinations are associated with a significantly higher rate of BI-RADS category 3 assessments than are nonbaseline examinations. Most cancers diagnosed at follow-up of BI-RADS 3 lesions are in an early stage and are diagnosed at or before the 6-month follow-up examination. When used judiciously, short-interval follow-up MRI is an appropriate method for identifying early-stage breast cancer while avoiding unnecessary biopsies with benign findings.
引用
收藏
页码:240 / 248
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Characteristics, Malignancy Rate, and Follow-up of BI-RADS Category 3 Lesions Identified at Breast MR Imaging: Implications for MR Image Interpretation and Management
    Chikarmane, Sona A.
    Birdwell, Robyn L.
    Poole, Patricia S.
    Sippo, Dorothy A.
    Giess, Catherine S.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2016, 280 (03) : 707 - 715
  • [2] DeMartini Wendy, 2008, Top Magn Reson Imaging, V19, P143, DOI 10.1097/RMR.0b013e31818a40a5
  • [3] Cancer yield of probably benign breast MR examinations
    Eby, Peter R.
    DeMartini, Wendy B.
    Peacock, Sue
    Rosen, Eric L.
    Lauro, Bridget
    Lehman, Constance D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2007, 26 (04) : 950 - 955
  • [4] Characteristics of Probably Benign Breast MRI Lesions
    Eby, Peter R.
    DeMartini, Wendy B.
    Gutierrez, Robert L.
    Saini, Monica H.
    Peacock, Sue
    Lehman, Constance D.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2009, 193 (03) : 861 - 867
  • [5] Frequency of Malignancy and Imaging Characteristics of Probably Benign Lesions Seen at Breast MRI
    Grimm, Lars J.
    Anderson, Andy L.
    Baker, Jay A.
    Johnson, Karen S.
    Walsh, Ruth
    Yoon, Sora C.
    Ghate, Sujata V.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2015, 205 (02) : 442 - 446
  • [6] MAMMOGRAPHIC FOLLOW-UP OF LOW-SUSPICION LESIONS - COMPLIANCE RATE AND DIAGNOSTIC YIELD
    HELVIE, MA
    PENNES, DR
    REBNER, M
    ADLER, DD
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1991, 178 (01) : 155 - 158
  • [7] Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition
    Kriege, M
    Brekelmans, CTM
    Boetes, C
    Besnard, PE
    Zonderland, HM
    Obdeijn, IM
    Manoliu, RA
    Kok, T
    Peterse, H
    Tilanus-Linthorst, MMA
    Muller, SH
    Meijer, S
    Oosterwijk, JC
    Beex, LVAM
    Tollenaar, RAEM
    de Koning, HJ
    Rutgers, EJT
    Klijn, JGM
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 351 (05) : 427 - 437
  • [8] Breast MR imaging screening in 192 women proved or suspected to be carriers of a breast cancer susceptibility gene: Preliminary results
    Kuhl, CK
    Schmutzler, RK
    Leutner, CC
    Kempe, A
    Wardelmann, E
    Hocke, A
    Maringa, M
    Pfeifer, U
    Krebs, D
    Schild, HH
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2000, 215 (01) : 267 - 279
  • [9] Concordance of BI-RADS Assessments and Management Recommendations for Breast MRI in Community Practice
    Lee, Amie Y.
    Ichikawa, Laura
    Lee, Janie M.
    Lee, Christoph I.
    DeMartini, Wendy B.
    Joe, Bonnie N.
    Wernli, Karen J.
    Sprague, Brian L.
    Herschorn, Sally D.
    Lehman, Constance D.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2016, 206 (01) : 211 - 216
  • [10] Breast MRI BI-RADS Assessments and Abnormal Interpretation Rates by Clinical Indication in US Community Practices
    Lee, Christoph I.
    Ichikawa, Laura
    Rochelle, Michele C.
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    Miglioretti, Diana L.
    Sprague, Brian L.
    DeMartini, Wendy B.
    Wernli, Karen J.
    Joe, Bonnie N.
    Yankaskas, Bonnie C.
    Lehman, Constance D.
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2014, 21 (11) : 1370 - 1376