Functional and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Following Percutaneous Decompression

被引:36
作者
Mekhail, Nagy [1 ]
Costandi, Shrif [1 ]
Abraham, Benjamin [1 ]
Samuel, Samuel Wadie [1 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Dept Pain Management, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
关键词
lumbar spinal stenosis; neurogenic claudication; decompression; ligamentum flavum; mild (R); percutaneous; PAIN DISABILITY INDEX; BILATERAL DECOMPRESSION; UNILATERAL LAMINOTOMY; LIGAMENTUM-FLAVUM; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1533-2500.2012.00565.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Neurogenic claudication due to symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a painful condition causing significant functional disability. While the cause of LSS is multifactorial, thickened ligamentum flavum (LF) accounts for up to 85% of spinal canal narrowing. mild percutaneous lumbar decompression allows debulking of the hypertrophic LF while avoiding the morbidities frequently associated with more invasive surgical procedures. Methods: In this prospective case series study, consecutive LSS patients presenting with neurogenic claudication were treated with percutaneous lumbar decompression. Efficacy was evaluated using the Pain Disability Index (PDI) and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. Pre- and postprocedure Standing Time, Walking Distance, and Visual Analog Score (VAS) were also monitored. Significant device- or procedure-related adverse events were reported. Results: The mild procedure was successfully performed on forty patients. At twelve months, both PDI and Roland-Morris showed significant improvement of 22.6 points (ANOVA, P < 0.0001) and 7.7 points (ANOVA, P < 0.0001), respectively. Walking Distance, Standing Time, and VAS improvements were also statistically significant, increasing from 246 to 3,956 feet (ANOVA, P < 0.0001), 8 to 56 minutes (ANOVA, P < 0.0001), and 7.1 to 3.6 points (ANOVA, P < 0.0001), respectively. Tukey HSD test found improvement in all 5-outcome measures to be significant from baseline at each follow-up interval. No significant device- or procedure-related adverse events were reported. Conclusion: This study demonstrated significant functional improvement as well as decreased disability secondary to neurogenic claudication after mild procedure. Safety, cost-effectiveness, and quality-of-life outcomes are best compared with comprehensive medical management in a randomized controlled fashion and, where ethical, to open lumbar decompression surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:417 / 425
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Abdi Salahadin, 2007, Pain Physician, V10, P185
[2]  
[Anonymous], JNR
[3]   Mild Procedure Single-site Prospective IRB Study [J].
Basu, Sanghamitra .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2012, 28 (03) :254-258
[4]   Understanding the relevance of measured change through studies of responsiveness [J].
Beaton, DE .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (24) :3192-3199
[5]   A Double-blind, Randomized, Prospective Study of Epidural Steroid Injection vs. The mild® Procedure in Patients with Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis [J].
Brown, Lora L. .
PAIN PRACTICE, 2012, 12 (05) :333-341
[6]   Midterm outcome after unilateral approach for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis:: 5-year prospective study [J].
Cavusoglu, Halit ;
Kaya, Ramazan Alper ;
Tuerkmenoglu, Osman Nuri ;
Tuncer, Cengiz ;
Colak, Ibrahim ;
Aydin, Yunus .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2007, 16 (12) :2133-2142
[7]  
Chopko B, 2010, PAIN PHYSICIAN, V13, P369
[8]   A novel method for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis in high-risk surgical candidates pilot study experience with percutaneous remodeling of ligamentum flavum and lamina Clinical article [J].
Chopko, Bohdan Wolodymyr .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2011, 14 (01) :46-50
[9]  
Deer TR, 2010, PAIN PHYSICIAN, V13, P35
[10]  
Elsberg CA., 1913, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V16, P117