Power-Based Generation Expansion Planning for Flexibility Requirements

被引:67
作者
Tejada-Arango, Diego A. [1 ]
Morales-Espana, German [2 ]
Wogrin, Sonja [1 ]
Centeno, Efraim [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pontificia Comillas, ICAI, Inst Invest Tecnol, Madrid 28015, Spain
[2] ECN Part TNO, Energy Transit Studies, NL-1043 NT Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Investment; Real-time systems; Power systems; Planning; Energy storage; Data models; Biological system modeling; Generation expansion planning; unit commitment; energy storage systems; capacity expansion planning; power system planning; power generation planning; OPERATIONAL FLEXIBILITY; ENERGY; CAPACITY; STORAGE; OPTIMIZATION; INTEGRATION; REANALYSIS; RESERVES; IMPACT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1109/TPWRS.2019.2940286
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Flexibility requirements are becoming more relevant in power system planning due to the integration of variable Renewable Energy Sources (vRES). In order to consider these requirements Generation Expansion Planning (GEP) models have recently incorporated Unit Commitment (UC) constraints, using traditional energy-based formulations. However, recent studies have shown that energy-based UC formulations overestimate the actual flexibility of the system. Instead, power-based UC models overcome these problems by correctly modeling ramping constraints and operating reserves. This paper proposes a power-based GEP-UC model that improves the existing models. The proposed model optimizes investment decisions on vRES, Energy Storage Systems (ESS), and thermal technologies. In addition, it includes real-time flexibility requirements, and the flexibility provided by ESS, as well as other UC constraints, e.g., minimum up/down times, startup and shutdown power trajectories, network constraints. The results show that power-based model uses the installed investments more effectively than the energy-based models because it more accurately represents flexibility capabilities and system requirements. For instance, the power-based model obtains less investment (6-12%) and yet it uses more efficiently this investment because operating cost is also lower (2-8%) in a real-time validation. We also propose a semi-relaxed power-based GEP-UC model, which is at least 10 times faster than its full-integer version and without significantly losing accuracy in the results (less than 0.2% error).
引用
收藏
页码:2012 / 2023
页数:12
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], THESIS
[2]  
ENTSO-E, 2018, ENTSO-E ten-year network development plan 2022 (TYNDP 2022) high-level report-final version
[3]   A tight MIP formulation of the unit commitment problem with start-up and shut-down constraints [J].
Gentile C. ;
Morales-España G. ;
Ramos A. .
EURO Journal on Computational Optimization, 2017, 5 (1-2) :177-201
[4]   Energy delivery capacity and generation scheduling in the deregulated electric power market [J].
Guan, XH ;
Gao, F ;
Svoboda, AJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2000, 15 (04) :1275-1280
[5]   Three Waves of US Reforms Following the Path of Wholesale Electricity Market Restructuring [J].
Hobbs, Benjamin F. ;
Oren, Shmuel S. .
IEEE POWER & ENERGY MAGAZINE, 2019, 17 (01) :73-81
[6]   OPTIMIZATION METHODS FOR ELECTRIC UTILITY RESOURCE PLANNING [J].
HOBBS, BF .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1995, 83 (01) :1-20
[7]   Representing Operational Flexibility in Generation Expansion Planning Through Convex Relaxation of Unit Commitment [J].
Hua, Bowen ;
Baldick, Ross ;
Wang, Jianhui .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2018, 33 (02) :2272-2281
[8]   State-of-the-art generation expansion planning: A review [J].
Koltsaklis, Nikolaos E. ;
Dagoumas, Athanasios S. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 230 :563-589
[9]   The Impact of the EU ETS on Prices, Profits and Emissions in the Power Sector: Simulation Results with the COMPETES EU20 Model [J].
Lise, Wietze ;
Sijm, Jos ;
Hobbs, Benjamin F. .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2010, 47 (01) :23-44
[10]   ETSAP-TIAM: the TIMES integrated assessment model Part I: Model structure [J].
Loulou, Richard ;
Labriet, Maryse .
COMPUTATIONAL MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2008, 5 (1-2) :7-40