Public perceptions for the use of nanomaterials for in-home drinking water purification devices

被引:16
|
作者
Kidd, Justin [1 ]
Westerhoff, Paul [1 ]
Maynard, Andrew D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Nanosyst Engn Res Ctr Nanotechnol Enabled Water T, Sch Sustainable Engn & Built Environm, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[2] Arizona State Univ, Sch Future Innovat Soc, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Point-of-use; Water treatment; Nanomaterials; Public perception; Drinking water; BOTTLED WATER; EMERGING OPPORTUNITIES; TAP-WATER; QUALITY; NANOTECHNOLOGY; CONSUMPTION; REDUCTION; BENEFITS; IMPACTS; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.impact.2020.100220
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Incorporating nanomaterials into point-of-use (POU) in-home water purification devices that treat well water or centrally-treated tap water offers new opportunities to meet growing customer demand for aesthetically pleasing and higher quality drinking water. While the technical performance and potential for nanomaterial release from POU devices have been studied, little is known about public acceptance of devices that use nanotechnology. We administered an 18-question survey of 1623 participants in four metropolitan areas-Phoenix, AZ (N = 362); Houston, TX (N = 380); Atlanta, GA (N = 419); and Philadelphia, PA (N = 415)-and one rural Arizona region (N = 47) to assess perceptions around using nanomaterial-enabled POU devices. Approximately 90% of survey respondents had little to no prior knowledge of nanomaterials or their use in numerous consumer products ranging from POU water treatment devices to clothing or baby products. Survey respondents were more likely to purchase conventional drinking water purification devices than ones containing nanomaterials, but the majority of survey respondents (similar to 64%) claimed they would likely or probably change their opinions around using nanomaterials to treat their drinking water if they were given more information about nanomaterials and their role in treating drinking water. The results indicate that respondents are willing to change their minds if they are provided information around nanomaterials and their use in in-home water purification. When we incorporated responses regarding previous knowledge of nanomaterials, we found that the less knowledge respondents had of nanomaterials, the more willing they would be to use them to treat their drinking water. 65% of respondents with prior knowledge of nanomaterials were unwilling to drink water treated with nanomaterials. Respondents considered the safety of the device as being most important to them, followed closely by treated water taste. 30% of respondents stated that they would purchase the drinking water purification product with nanomaterials if it worked as effectively as a competitor and was half the price. 26% of respondents stated that they would purchase the drinking water purification product with nanomaterials if it worked twice as effectively as a competitor and was half the price. The findings are discussed in regard to specific adoption of nanotechnology in drinking water and also broader adoption and acceptance of emerging technologies that hold promise to improve environmental outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [21] Taste and odour and public perceptions: what do our customers really think about their drinking water?
    Webber, Michael A.
    Atherton, Paul
    Newcombe, Gayle
    JOURNAL OF WATER SUPPLY RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY-AQUA, 2015, 64 (07): : 802 - 811
  • [22] Cost-benefit analysis of point-of-use devices for health risks reduction from pathogens in drinking water
    Verhougstraete, Marc
    Reynolds, Kelly A.
    Pearce-Walker, Jennifer
    Gerba, Charles
    JOURNAL OF WATER AND HEALTH, 2020, 18 (06) : 968 - 982
  • [23] High-efficiency Pb2+removal by hydroxy-sodalite for point-of-use drinking water purification
    Zheng, Qian
    Wang, Ziwei
    Tian, Zhouyang
    Cai, Lin
    Jiang, Chengfeng
    Deng, Lili
    Yang, Dazhong
    Wei, Zhenhua
    JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2025, 487
  • [24] Occurrence of non-fermenting gram negative bacteria in drinking water dispensed from point-of-use microfiltration devices
    Zanetti, Franza
    de Luca, Giovanna
    Leoni, Erica
    Sacchetti, Rossella
    ANNALS OF AGRICULTURAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2014, 21 (01) : 29 - 34
  • [25] Water Use by Inland Aquaculture in Thailand: Stakeholder Perceptions, Scientific Evidence, and Public Policy
    Lebel, Louis
    Lebel, Phimphakan
    Chuah, C. Joon
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 63 (04) : 554 - 563
  • [26] Comparing Public Perceptions of Alternative Water Sources for Potable Use: The Case of Rainwater, Stormwater, Desalinated Water, and Recycled Water
    Fielding, Kelly S.
    Gardner, John
    Leviston, Zoe
    Price, Jennifer
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2015, 29 (12) : 4501 - 4518
  • [27] Effects of time and point-of-use devices on arsenic levels in Southeastern Michigan drinking water, USA
    Slotnick, Melissa J.
    Meliker, Jaymie R.
    Nriagu, Jerome O.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 369 (1-3) : 42 - 50
  • [28] An agent-based spatiotemporal integrated approach to simulating in-home water and related energy use behaviour: A test case of Beijing, China
    Zhuge, Chengxiang
    Yu, Min
    Wang, Chunyan
    Cui, Yilan
    Liu, Yi
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 708
  • [29] Do in-home displays affect end-user consumptions? A mixed method analysis of electricity, heating and water use in Danish apartments
    Canale, Laura
    Slott, Babette Peulicke
    Finsdottir, Sara
    Kildemoes, Lasse Ring
    Andersen, Rune Korsholm
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2021, 246 (246)
  • [30] Self-Reported Physical Complaints are Reduced Upon Regular Use of an In-Home Water Filter System (AcalaQuell®): A Prospective, Controlled Documentation Study
    Schneider, Rainer
    NATURAL PRODUCTS JOURNAL, 2021, 11 (05) : 673 - 681