Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: practical prognostic models based on large cohort of international patients

被引:794
作者
Perel, Pablo [1 ]
Arango, Miguel [1 ]
Clayton, Tim [1 ]
Edwards, Phil [1 ]
Komolafe, Edward [1 ]
Pocock, Stuart [1 ]
Roberts, Ian [1 ]
Shakur, Haleema [1 ]
Steyerberg, Ewout [1 ]
Yutthakasemsunt, Surakrant [1 ]
机构
[1] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, London WC1B 3DP, England
来源
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2008年 / 336卷 / 7641期
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bmj.39461.643438.25
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To develop and validate practical prognostic models for death at 14 days and for death or severe disability six months after traumatic brain injury. Design Multivariable logistic regression to select variables that were independently associated with two patient outcomes. Two models designed: "basic" model (demographic and clinical variables only) and "CT" model (basic model plus results of computed tomography). The models were subsequently developed for high and low-middle income countries separately. Setting Medical Research Council (MRC) CRASH Trial. Subjects 10 008 patients with traumatic brain injury. Models externally validated in a cohort of 8509. Results The basic model included four predictors: age, Glasgow coma scale, pupil reactivity, and the presence of major extracranial injury. The CT model also included the presence of petechial haemorrhages, obliteration of the third ventricle or basal cisterns, subarachnoid bleeding, midline shift, and non-evacuated haematoma. In the derivation sample the models showed excellent discrimination (C statistic above 0.80). The models showed good calibration graphically. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test also indicated good calibration, except for the CT model in low-middle income countries. External validation for unfavourable outcome at six months in high income countries showed that basic and CT models had good discrimination (C statistic 0.77 for both models) but poorer calibration. Conclusion Simple prognostic models can be used to obtain valid predictions of relevant outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury.
引用
收藏
页码:425 / 429
页数:9
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Systematic reviews in health care - Systematic reviews of evaluations of prognostic variables
    Altman, DG
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 323 (7306): : 224 - 228
  • [2] *BRAIN TRAUM FDN U, 2000, MAN PROGN SEV TRAUM
  • [3] The epidemiology of traumatic brain injury: A review
    Bruns, TJ
    Hauser, WA
    [J]. EPILEPSIA, 2003, 44 : 2 - 10
  • [4] Edwards P, 2005, LANCET, V365, P1957
  • [5] Long term outcome after traumatic brain injury - More attention needs to be paid to neuropsychiatric functioning
    Fleminger, S
    Ponsford, J
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 331 (7530): : 1419 - +
  • [6] Harrell FE, 1996, STAT MED, V15, P361, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960229)15:4<361::AID-SIM168>3.0.CO
  • [7] 2-4
  • [8] Addressing the growing burden of trauma and injury in low- and middle-income countries
    Hofman, K
    Primack, A
    Keusch, G
    Hrynkow, S
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2005, 95 (01) : 13 - 17
  • [9] Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: Development and validation of a prognostic score based on admission characteristics
    Hukkelhoven, CWPM
    Steyerberg, EW
    Habbema, JDF
    Farace, E
    Marmarou, A
    Murray, GD
    Marshall, LF
    Maas, AIR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2005, 22 (10) : 1025 - 1039
  • [10] Patient age and outcome following severe traumatic brain injury: an analysis of 5600 patients
    Hukkelhoven, CWPM
    Steyerberg, EW
    Rampen, AJJ
    Farace, E
    Habbema, JDF
    Marshall, LF
    Murray, GD
    Maas, AIR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2003, 99 (04) : 666 - 673