AUSTRALIAN EXPERIENCE: CIVIC ENGAGEMENT AS SYMBOL AND SUBSTANCE

被引:20
作者
Head, Brian W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Social Sci Res Inst, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
关键词
Australia; civic engagement; community consultation; expert forums; efficiency and legitimacy; place-based services; environmental management; indigenous governance; PUBLIC-POLICY; PARTICIPATION; GOVERNANCE; COMMUNITY; CITIZENS;
D O I
10.1002/pad.599
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This article outlines how civic engagement has become a distinctive feature of the policy development and review processes of governments in Australia, a federal polity. The patterns of civic engagement are quite variable across policy issues, levels of government and geographical regions. Civic engagement (or community consultation) has become a purposeful and planned dimension of policy development in most Australian jurisdictions since the 1980s. Two main reasons for this development are elaborated: the instrumental arguments about programme improvement and effectiveness, and the normative arguments about democratic legitimacy and rights to civic participation. The role of government-sponsored processes for civic engagement is contrasted with the proliferation of new media and independent civil-society forums available for commentary and advocacy. Key distinctions are drawn between various processes and methods of civic engagement in Australia, raising issues about the scope and authenticity of participation on different types of issues. There are specific challenges of involvement by and for indigenous communities, and the special needs of remote communities whose level of social and economic exclusion remains seriously depressed. The conclusions raise some implications for policy development and for state legitimacy arising from impoverished forms of civic engagement. Copyright (C) 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 112
页数:11
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [41] Henman P, 2010, GOVERNING ELECTRONICALLY: E-GOVERNMENT AND THE RECONFIGURATION OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, POLICY AND POWER, P1, DOI 10.1057/9780230248496
  • [42] Innes Judith E., 2004, Planning Theory Practice, V5, P419, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1080/1464935042000293170, DOI 10.1080/1464935042000293170]
  • [43] International Association for Public Participation, 2005, PUBL PART SPECTR
  • [44] Jackson W., 2003, CANBERRA B PUBLIC AD, V109, P20
  • [45] Keane John., 2009, LIFE DEATH DEMOCRACY
  • [46] Kooiman J., 2000, DEBATING GOVERNANCE
  • [47] Lovan W.Robert., 2004, PARTICIPATORY GOVERN
  • [48] Need public policy ignore the third sector? Government policy in Australia and the United Kingdom
    Lyons, Mark
    Passey, Andrew
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2006, 65 (03) : 90 - 102
  • [49] Mandell M.P., 2001, GETTING RESULTS COLL
  • [50] NANCARROW B, 2001, RIVER MURRAY ENV FLO