Emergency contraception: Oral and intrauterine options

被引:0
|
作者
Black, Kirsten I. [1 ]
Hussainy, Safeera Y. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Discipline Obstet Gynaecol & Neonatol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Ctr Med Use & Safety, Fac Pharm & Pharmaceut Sci, Clayton, Vic, Australia
关键词
ULIPRISTAL ACETATE; RANDOMIZED-TRIALS; PREGNANCY RATES; LEVONORGESTREL; MULTICENTER; OVULATION; DEVICE; WOMEN;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Emergency contraception can be used to prevent pregnancy where contraception has not been used, or there has been contraceptive misuse or failure. Australian women have three options for emergency contraception: two types of oral pills (levonorgestrel [LNG]-containing pill and ulipristal acetate [UPA]) and the copper intrauterine device (IUD). Both pills are available from pharmacies without prescription, whereas the copper IUD requires insertion by a trained provider. Objective The objective of this article is to describe the indications, efficacy and contraindications for use of the three emergency contraceptive methods available in Australia. Discussion Emergency contraception can potentially reduce the risk of unplanned pregnancies. The oral methods have similar side effects, but UPA is more effective than LNG and can be used up to five days after intercourse. The copper IUD is the most effective method, and provides ongoing contraception for up to 10 years. Factors to consider when recommending one option over another include time since unprotected sex, body mass index and use of enzyme-inducing medicines.
引用
收藏
页码:722 / 726
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Hormonal methods for emergency contraception
    Li, Raymond Hang Wun
    Lo, Sue Seen Tsing
    Cameron, Sharon Tracey
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2024, 97
  • [42] Hormonal evaluation and midcycle detection of intrauterine glycodelin in women treated with levonorgestrel as in emergency contraception
    Durand, Marta
    Koistinen, Riitta
    Chirinos, Mayel
    Luis Rodriguez, Jose
    Zambrano, Elena
    Seppala, Markku
    Larrea, Fernando
    CONTRACEPTION, 2010, 82 (06) : 526 - 533
  • [43] Emergency contraception:What is new?
    Sefa Kelekci
    Serpil Aydogmus
    World Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2015, (04) : 95 - 101
  • [44] Mechanism of action of emergency contraception
    Gemzell-Danielsson, Kristina
    CONTRACEPTION, 2010, 82 (05) : 404 - 409
  • [45] Comparison of vaginal and oral administration of emergency contraception
    Mor, E
    Saadat, P
    Kives, S
    White, E
    Reid, RL
    Paulson, RJ
    Stanczyk, FZ
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2005, 84 (01) : 40 - 45
  • [46] The levonorgestrel intrauterine system in contraception
    Lähteenmäki, P
    Rauramo, I
    Backman, T
    STEROIDS, 2000, 65 (10-11) : 693 - 697
  • [47] Emergency contraception
    Dunn, Sheila
    Guilbert, Edith
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2013, 120 (01) : 102 - 107
  • [48] Emergency contraception
    Ludwig M.
    Der Gynäkologe, 2018, 51 (12): : 1047 - 1059
  • [49] Emergency Contraception
    不详
    JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING, 2017, 46 (06): : 886 - 888
  • [50] Emergency contraception
    Li, Hang-Wun Raymond
    Lo, Sue Seen Tsing
    Ho, Pak-Chung
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2014, 28 (06) : 835 - 844