Emergency contraception: Oral and intrauterine options

被引:0
|
作者
Black, Kirsten I. [1 ]
Hussainy, Safeera Y. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Discipline Obstet Gynaecol & Neonatol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Ctr Med Use & Safety, Fac Pharm & Pharmaceut Sci, Clayton, Vic, Australia
关键词
ULIPRISTAL ACETATE; RANDOMIZED-TRIALS; PREGNANCY RATES; LEVONORGESTREL; MULTICENTER; OVULATION; DEVICE; WOMEN;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Emergency contraception can be used to prevent pregnancy where contraception has not been used, or there has been contraceptive misuse or failure. Australian women have three options for emergency contraception: two types of oral pills (levonorgestrel [LNG]-containing pill and ulipristal acetate [UPA]) and the copper intrauterine device (IUD). Both pills are available from pharmacies without prescription, whereas the copper IUD requires insertion by a trained provider. Objective The objective of this article is to describe the indications, efficacy and contraindications for use of the three emergency contraceptive methods available in Australia. Discussion Emergency contraception can potentially reduce the risk of unplanned pregnancies. The oral methods have similar side effects, but UPA is more effective than LNG and can be used up to five days after intercourse. The copper IUD is the most effective method, and provides ongoing contraception for up to 10 years. Factors to consider when recommending one option over another include time since unprotected sex, body mass index and use of enzyme-inducing medicines.
引用
收藏
页码:722 / 726
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] An Update on Emergency Contraception
    Bosworth, Michele C.
    Olusola, Patti L.
    Low, Sarah B.
    AMERICAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2014, 89 (07) : 545 - 550
  • [32] Emergency contraception - A review
    Rudzinski, Patryk
    Lopuszynska, Inga
    Pazik, Dorota
    Adamowicz, Dominik
    Jargielo, Anna
    Cieslik, Aleksandra
    Kosieradzka, Karolina
    Stanczyk, Justyna
    Meliksetian, Astrik
    Wosinska, Alicja
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2023, 291 : 213 - 218
  • [33] Update on emergency contraception
    Fok, Wing Kay
    Blumenthal, Paul D.
    CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 28 (06) : 522 - 529
  • [34] The Underutilization of Emergency Contraception
    Devine, Kit S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING, 2012, 112 (04) : 44 - 50
  • [35] Ulipristal acetate compared to levonorgestrel emergency contraception among current oral contraceptive users: a cost-effectiveness analysis
    Bullard, Kimberley A.
    Edelman, Alison B.
    Williams, Shannon M.
    Rodriguez, Maria, I
    CONTRACEPTION, 2019, 100 (03) : 222 - 227
  • [36] Survey of emergency physicians regarding emergency contraception
    Probst, Marc A.
    Lin, Michelle P.
    Lawrence, Lindsey G.
    Robey-Gavin, Erin
    Pendery, Leslie S.
    Strayer, Reuben J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 34 (06) : 1176 - 1178
  • [37] Levonorgestrel vs. Copper Intrauterine Devices for Emergency Contraception
    Turok, David K.
    Gero, Alexandra
    Simmons, Rebecca G.
    Kaiser, Jennifer E.
    Stoddard, Gregory J.
    Sexsmith, Corinne D.
    Gawron, Lori M.
    Sanders, Jessica N.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2021, 384 (04) : 335 - 344
  • [38] Exploring young women's reasons for adopting intrauterine or oral emergency contraception in the United States: a qualitative study
    Kaller, Shelly
    Mays, Aisha
    Freedman, Lori
    Harper, Cynthia C.
    Biggs, M. Antonia
    BMC WOMENS HEALTH, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [39] Effect of levonorgestrel emergency contraception on implantation and fertility: A review
    Endler, M.
    Li, R. H. W.
    Danielsson, K. Gemzell
    CONTRACEPTION, 2022, 109 : 8 - 18
  • [40] Emergency contraception - mechanisms of action
    Gemzell-Danielsson, Kristina
    Berger, Cecilia
    Lalitkumar, P. G. L.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2013, 87 (03) : 300 - 308