Effects of Resistance Training Performed with Different Loads in Untrained and Trained Male Adult Individuals on Maximal Strength and Muscle Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review

被引:34
作者
Lacio, Marcio [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Vieira, Joao Guilherme [1 ,2 ]
Trybulski, Robert [4 ]
Campos, Yuri [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Santana, Derick [3 ]
Elias Filho, Jose [1 ]
Novaes, Jefferson [6 ]
Vianna, Jeferson [1 ]
Wilk, Michal [7 ]
机构
[1] Fed Univ Juiz De Fora UFJF, Postgrad Program Phys Educ, BR-36036900 Juiz De Fora, Brazil
[2] Fed Univ Juiz De Fora UFJF, Strength Training Res Lab, BR-36036900 Juiz De Fora, Brazil
[3] Granbery Methodist Coll, Lab Exercise Physiol & Morphofunct Evaluat LABFEX, BR-36036900 Juiz De Fora, Brazil
[4] Wojciech Korfanty Sch Econ, Dept Med Sci, PL-40065 Katowice, Poland
[5] Fed Univ Lavras UFLA, Study Grp & Res Neuromuscular Responses, BR-37200900 Lavras, Brazil
[6] Fed Univ Rio De Janeiro UFRJ, Postgrad Program Phys Educ, BR-21941901 Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[7] Jerzy Kukuczka Acad Phys Educ Katowice, Inst Sport Sci, PL-40065 Katowice, Poland
关键词
adult male; high load; low load; morphological adaptations; strength training; TONIC FORCE GENERATION; SLOW MOVEMENT; MUSCULAR ADAPTATIONS; NEURAL ADAPTATION; FIBER HYPERTROPHY; EXERCISE; SIZE; INTENSITIES; PROGRESSION; GAINS;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph182111237
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The load in resistance training is considered to be a critical variable for neuromuscular adaptations. Therefore, it is important to assess the effects of applying different loads on the development of maximal strength and muscular hypertrophy. The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature and compare the effects of resistance training that was performed with low loads versus moderate and high loads in untrained and trained healthy adult males on the development of maximal strength and muscle hypertrophy during randomized experimental designs. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (2021) were followed with the eligibility criteria defined according to participants, interventions, comparators, outcomes, and study design (PICOS): (P) healthy males between 18 and 40 years old, (I) interventions performed with low loads, (C) interventions performed with moderate or high loads, (O) development of maximal strength and muscle hypertrophy, and (S) randomized experimental studies with between- or within-subject parallel designs. The literature search strategy was performed in three electronic databases (Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science) on 22 August 2021. Results: Twenty-three studies with a total of 563 participants (80.6% untrained and 19.4% trained) were selected. The studies included both relative and absolute loads. All studies were classified as being moderate-to-high methodological quality, although only two studies had a score higher than six points. The main findings indicated that the load magnitude that was used during resistance training influenced the dynamic strength and isometric strength gains. In general, comparisons between the groups (i.e., low, moderate, and high loads) showed higher gains in 1RM and maximal voluntary isometric contraction when moderate and high loads were used. In contrast, regarding muscle hypertrophy, most studies showed that when resistance training was performed to muscle failure, the load used had less influence on muscle hypertrophy. The current literature shows that gains in maximal strength are more pronounced with high and moderate loads compared to low loads in healthy adult male populations. However, for muscle hypertrophy, studies indicate that a wide spectrum of loads (i.e., 30 to 90% 1RM) may be used for healthy adult male populations.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] Neural adaptation to resistance training: changes in evoked V-wave and H-reflex responses
    Aagaard, P
    Simonsen, EB
    Andersen, JL
    Magnusson, P
    Dyhre-Poulsen, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 92 (06) : 2309 - 2318
  • [2] ANDERSON T, 1982, RES Q EXERCISE SPORT, V53, P1
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2016, Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning
  • [4] Effects of short-term, medium-term and long-term resistance exercise training on cardiometabolic health outcomes in adults: systematic review with meta-analysis
    Ashton, Ruth E.
    Tew, Garry A.
    Aning, Jonathan J.
    Gilbert, Stephen E.
    Lewis, Liane
    Saxton, John M.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2020, 54 (06) : 341 - +
  • [5] Muscle size and strength: debunking the "completely separate phenomena" suggestion
    Balshaw, Thomas G.
    Massey, Garry J.
    Maden-Wilkinson, Thomas M.
    Folland, Jonathan P.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 117 (06) : 1275 - 1276
  • [6] Health research - How to formulate research recommendations
    Brown, P.
    Brunnhuber, K.
    Chalkidou, K.
    Chalmers, I.
    Clarke, M.
    Fenton, M.
    Forbes, C.
    Glanville, J.
    Hicks, N. J.
    Moody, J.
    Twaddle, S.
    Timimi, H.
    Young, P.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 333 (7572): : 804 - 806
  • [7] Burd NA, 2012, APPL PHYSIOL NUTR ME, V37, P551, DOI [10.1139/h2012-022, 10.1139/H2012-022]
  • [8] Muscular adaptations in response to three different resistance-training regimens: specificity of repetition maximum training zones
    Campos, GER
    Luecke, TJ
    Wendeln, HK
    Toma, K
    Hagerman, FC
    Murray, TF
    Ragg, KE
    Ratamess, NA
    Kraemer, WJ
    Staron, RS
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 88 (1-2) : 50 - 60
  • [9] Resistance training enhances the stability of sensorimotor coordination
    Carroll, TJ
    Barry, B
    Riek, S
    Carson, RG
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2001, 268 (1464) : 221 - 227
  • [10] COFFEY T H, 1946, Treat Serv Bull, V1, P8