How do most low ETR firms avoid paying taxes?

被引:30
作者
Christensen, Dane M. [1 ]
Kenchington, David G. [2 ]
Laux, Rick C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
[2] Arizona State Univ, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[3] Purdue Univ, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
关键词
Taxes; Net operating loss carryforwards; Tax risk; Political economy; AGGRESSIVENESS; INCENTIVES; RATES; RISK; US;
D O I
10.1007/s11142-021-09614-8
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Evidence suggests a large proportion of profitable U.S. firms have low effective tax rates (i.e., an ETR between 0 and 10%). Despite widespread interest in how firms avoid paying taxes, we do not know how most firms attain low ETRs and whether they are primarily benefiting from benign or aggressive tax positions. Using a research design that explicitly examines low ETR firms, we predict and find that the majority are primarily benefiting from a benign tax position: large net operating loss carryforwards (NOLs). We also find that large NOLs allow firms to persistently retain low ETRs year after year. In contrast, we find that multinationals and tax haven firms, which should have more opportunities for aggressive tax planning, have a lower probability of attaining a low ETR (relative to domestic and non-tax haven firms). Collectively, these findings suggest that the typical low ETR firm does not incur significant tax risk. Consistent with this, we find that low ETR firms accrue unrecognized tax benefits at a similar rate as firms that pay the statutory tax rate and do not experience higher future tax rate volatility. Overall, the results shed light on the profile of the average low ETR firm and provide evidence that the majority are utilizing large NOLs rather than aggressive tax planning.
引用
收藏
页码:570 / 606
页数:37
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   How Do Chinese Exporting Firms Respond to Environment-related Notifi cations? A Green Innovation Perspective [J].
Chen, Wen ;
Fan, Yinzi .
CHINA & WORLD ECONOMY, 2024, 32 (05) :1-27
[42]   How do ESG affect the spillover of green innovation among peer firms? Mechanism discussion and performance study [J].
Li, Jinchang ;
Lian, Ganghui ;
Xu, Aiting .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2023, 158
[43]   Pre-hypertension: how low to go and do drugs have a role? [J].
McInnes, Gordon .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2012, 73 (02) :187-193
[44]   How do business owners respond to a tax cut? Examining the 199A deduction for pass-through firms [J].
Goodman, Lucas ;
Lim, Katherine ;
Sacerdote, Bruce ;
Whitten, Andrew .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2025, 242
[45]   How do firms design R&D cooperation contracts with innovation institutes by considering the impacts of selective subsidy? [J].
Wu, Aiping ;
Li, Hua ;
Du, Danyang ;
Guo, Wei .
MANAGERIAL AND DECISION ECONOMICS, 2024, 45 (07) :4533-4551
[46]   Why do firms rarely adopt IFRS voluntarily? Academics find significant benefits and the costs appear to be low [J].
Christensen, Hans B. .
REVIEW OF ACCOUNTING STUDIES, 2012, 17 (03) :518-525
[47]   How Do Innovation-Driven Policies Help Sports Firms Sustain Growth? The Mediating Role of R&D Investment [J].
Ding, Yang ;
Chen, Gang .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (23)
[48]   How Do Life Insurers Respond to a Prolonged Low Interest Rate Environment? A Literature Review [J].
Suwanmalai, Wilaiporn ;
Zaby, Simon .
RISKS, 2022, 10 (08)
[49]   How Well Do Low-PRAL Diets Fare in Comparison to the 2020-2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans? [J].
Storz, Maximilian Andreas ;
Ronco, Alvaro Luis .
HEALTHCARE, 2023, 11 (02)
[50]   Controversies in Osteoporosis Management: How Do You Treat a Newly Menopausal Woman With Low Bone Mass: When and How Is It Appropriate to Provide Pharmacologic Intervention to Prevent Osteoporosis? [J].
Jiang, Xuezhi ;
Kagan, Risa ;
Schnatz, Peter F. .
CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 56 (04) :739-742