How do most low ETR firms avoid paying taxes?

被引:30
作者
Christensen, Dane M. [1 ]
Kenchington, David G. [2 ]
Laux, Rick C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
[2] Arizona State Univ, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[3] Purdue Univ, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
关键词
Taxes; Net operating loss carryforwards; Tax risk; Political economy; AGGRESSIVENESS; INCENTIVES; RATES; RISK; US;
D O I
10.1007/s11142-021-09614-8
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Evidence suggests a large proportion of profitable U.S. firms have low effective tax rates (i.e., an ETR between 0 and 10%). Despite widespread interest in how firms avoid paying taxes, we do not know how most firms attain low ETRs and whether they are primarily benefiting from benign or aggressive tax positions. Using a research design that explicitly examines low ETR firms, we predict and find that the majority are primarily benefiting from a benign tax position: large net operating loss carryforwards (NOLs). We also find that large NOLs allow firms to persistently retain low ETRs year after year. In contrast, we find that multinationals and tax haven firms, which should have more opportunities for aggressive tax planning, have a lower probability of attaining a low ETR (relative to domestic and non-tax haven firms). Collectively, these findings suggest that the typical low ETR firm does not incur significant tax risk. Consistent with this, we find that low ETR firms accrue unrecognized tax benefits at a similar rate as firms that pay the statutory tax rate and do not experience higher future tax rate volatility. Overall, the results shed light on the profile of the average low ETR firm and provide evidence that the majority are utilizing large NOLs rather than aggressive tax planning.
引用
收藏
页码:570 / 606
页数:37
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   How do Firms' Outward FDI Strategies Relate to their Activity at Home? Empirical Evidence for the UK [J].
Simpson, Helen .
WORLD ECONOMY, 2012, 35 (03) :243-272
[32]   How do auditors respond to low annual report readability? [J].
Blanco, Belen ;
Coram, Paul ;
Dhole, Sandip ;
Kent, Pamela .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2021, 40 (03)
[33]   How can firms? transition to a low-carbon economy affect the distance to default? [J].
Gutierrez-Lopez, Cristina ;
Castro, Paula ;
Tascon, Maria .
RESEARCH IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE, 2022, 62
[34]   How do entrepreneurial firms behave in the face of environmental turbulence and uncertainty? Evidence from the manufacturing sector [J].
St-Pierre, Josee ;
Julien, Pierre-Andre ;
Fadil, Nazik .
JOURNAL OF SMALL BUSINESS AND ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT, 2023, :880-901
[35]   How do ownership type and knowledge transfer influence success of change? A study of transition economy firms [J].
Bahl, Mona ;
Kriauciunas, Aldas ;
Brush, Thomas H. .
GLOBAL STRATEGY JOURNAL, 2020, 10 (04) :861-884
[36]   How Do MNEs and Domestic Firms Respond Locally to a Global Demand Shock? Evidence from a Pandemic [J].
Adbi, Arzi ;
Chatterjee, Chirantan ;
Mishra, Anant .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2022, 68 (12) :9003-9025
[37]   How Do Reductions in Foreign Country Corporate Tax Rates Affect US Domestic Manufacturing Firms? [J].
Kim, Jaewoo ;
Nessa, Michelle ;
Wilson, Ryan J. .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2021, 96 (03) :287-311
[38]   (How) do credit market conditions affect firms' post-hedging outcomes? Evidence from bank lending standards and firms' currency exposure [J].
Bergbrant, Mikael C. ;
Hunter, Delroy M. .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2018, 50 :203-222
[39]   How Low Do We Go (in the Post-SPRINT Era)? [J].
Burgner, Anna ;
Lewis, Julia B. .
ADVANCES IN CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE, 2019, 26 (02) :110-116
[40]   How do firms learn? Evidence from corporate cash holdings during the COVID-19 pandemic [J].
Bishal, B. C. ;
Simpson, Thuy .
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2023, 63 (01) :77-108