How do most low ETR firms avoid paying taxes?

被引:25
作者
Christensen, Dane M. [1 ]
Kenchington, David G. [2 ]
Laux, Rick C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
[2] Arizona State Univ, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[3] Purdue Univ, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
关键词
Taxes; Net operating loss carryforwards; Tax risk; Political economy; AGGRESSIVENESS; INCENTIVES; RATES; RISK; US;
D O I
10.1007/s11142-021-09614-8
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Evidence suggests a large proportion of profitable U.S. firms have low effective tax rates (i.e., an ETR between 0 and 10%). Despite widespread interest in how firms avoid paying taxes, we do not know how most firms attain low ETRs and whether they are primarily benefiting from benign or aggressive tax positions. Using a research design that explicitly examines low ETR firms, we predict and find that the majority are primarily benefiting from a benign tax position: large net operating loss carryforwards (NOLs). We also find that large NOLs allow firms to persistently retain low ETRs year after year. In contrast, we find that multinationals and tax haven firms, which should have more opportunities for aggressive tax planning, have a lower probability of attaining a low ETR (relative to domestic and non-tax haven firms). Collectively, these findings suggest that the typical low ETR firm does not incur significant tax risk. Consistent with this, we find that low ETR firms accrue unrecognized tax benefits at a similar rate as firms that pay the statutory tax rate and do not experience higher future tax rate volatility. Overall, the results shed light on the profile of the average low ETR firm and provide evidence that the majority are utilizing large NOLs rather than aggressive tax planning.
引用
收藏
页码:570 / 606
页数:37
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] How do firms respond to empty creditor holdout in distressed exchanges?
    Narayanan, Rajesh
    Uzmanoglu, Cihan
    JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2018, 94 : 251 - 266
  • [22] How do firms achieve corporate social performance? An integrated perspective
    Ben-Amar, Walid
    Francoeur, Claude
    Marsat, Sylvain
    Sijamic Wahid, Aida
    CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 28 (03) : 1078 - 1090
  • [23] How Quickly Do Firms Adjust to Optimal Levels of Tax Avoidance?
    Kim, Jaewoo
    McGuire, Sean T.
    Savoy, Steven
    Wilson, Ryan
    CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2019, 36 (03) : 1824 - 1860
  • [24] How Do National Firms Respond to Local Cost Shocks?t
    Butters, R. Andrew
    Sacks, Daniel W.
    Seo, Boyoung
    AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2022, 112 (05) : 1737 - 1772
  • [25] How Do Investors and Firms React to a Large, Unexpected Currency Appreciation Shock?
    Efing, Matthias
    Fahlenbrach, Rudiger
    Herpfer, Christoph
    Krueger, Philipp
    REVIEW OF CORPORATE FINANCE STUDIES, 2023, 12 (03) : 488 - 538
  • [26] How do financial analysts interpret industrial firms' corporate refocusing announcements?
    Mak, Chun Yu
    BRITISH ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2017, 49 (05) : 493 - 511
  • [27] Deal characteristics and M&A performance: How do hospitality firms fare?
    Li, Yuan
    Singal, Manisha
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, 2021, 96
  • [28] How do zombie firms affect innovation: from the perspective of credit resources distortion
    Qiao, Xiaole
    Song, Lin
    Fan, Xiaomin
    ASIAN-PACIFIC ECONOMIC LITERATURE, 2022, 36 (01) : 67 - 87
  • [29] Do firms using real earnings management care about taxes? Evidence from a high book-tax conformity country
    Kaldonski, Michal
    Jewartowski, Tomasz
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 35
  • [30] How do foreign firms patent in emerging economies with weak appropriability regimes? Archetypes and motives
    Keupp, Marcus Matthias
    Friesike, Sascha
    von Zedtwitz, Maximilian
    RESEARCH POLICY, 2012, 41 (08) : 1422 - 1439