Procedural and Distributive Justice Beliefs for Self and Others Assessment of a Four-Factor Individual Differences Model

被引:79
作者
Lucas, Todd [1 ]
Zhdanova, Ludmila [1 ]
Alexander, Sheldon [1 ]
机构
[1] Wayne State Univ, Dept Family Med & Publ Hlth Sci, Detroit, MI 48201 USA
关键词
justice; self-other; procedural justice; distributive justice; just world; social identity; social value orientation; SOCIAL DESIRABILITY BIAS; WORLD; ATTITUDES; IDENTITY; VALUES; HEALTH; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1027/1614-0001/a000032
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Both theory and research suggest that beliefs about justice for the self are distinct from beliefs about justice for others. Self-other differences, however, have not yet intersected with research on procedural and distributive justice. We examined the psychometrics and validity of a proposed four-dimensional measure of procedural and distributive justice beliefs for self and others. Participants from three samples (total N = 1463) completed dispositional measures of beliefs about fair outcomes (distributive justice beliefs) and processes (procedural justice beliefs). These measures were modified and expanded to record beliefs about justice for the self and justice for others. We also administered measures of well-being and harsh social attitudes. Factor analyses strongly supported the proposed four-factor model. In addition, higher-order self-others and procedural-distributive factors were indicated by theoretically appropriate lower-level factors. Finally, multiple regression analyses provided evidence for idiosyncratic links between four-factor individual differences and measures of well-being and harsh social attitudes. The proposed four-factor operationalization can provide individual differences researchers with a useful tool for bridging two important areas of justice theory and research that previously have been linked to health behavior, well-being, and harsh social attitudes.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 25
页数:12
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
ADAMS JS, 1965, ADV EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V2, P267
[2]   Effects of Social Value Orientations on Fairness Judgments [J].
Anderson, William D. ;
Patterson, Miles L. .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 148 (02) :223-245
[3]   Structural equation modelling: Adjudging model fit [J].
Barrett, Paul .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2007, 42 (05) :815-824
[4]   Two spheres of belief in justice:: Extensive support for the bidimensional model of belief in a just world [J].
Bègue, L ;
Bastounis, M .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2003, 71 (03) :435-463
[5]  
BENTLER PM, 1990, PSYCHOL BULL, V107, P238, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
[6]  
Browne M. W., 1993, TESTING STRUCTURAL E, P136, DOI DOI 10.1177/0049124192021002005
[7]   Testing factorial invariance across groups: A reconceptualization and proposed new method [J].
Cheung, GW ;
Rensvold, RB .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1999, 25 (01) :1-27
[8]   A GLOBAL MEASURE OF PERCEIVED STRESS [J].
COHEN, S ;
KAMARCK, T ;
MERMELSTEIN, R .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL BEHAVIOR, 1983, 24 (04) :385-396
[9]   BELIEF IN A JUST WORLD AND ATTITUDES TOWARD AIDS SUFFERERS [J].
CONNORS, J ;
HEAVEN, PCL .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 130 (04) :559-560
[10]  
Dalbert C., 2001, JUSTICE MOTIVE PERSO