The impact of colonial-era policies on health workforce regulation in India: lessons for contemporary reform

被引:8
作者
Sriram, Veena [1 ,2 ]
Keshri, Vikash R. [3 ,4 ]
Kumbhar, Kiran [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Sch Publ Policy & Global Affairs, CK Choi Bldg,251-1855 West Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z2, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Sch Populat & Publ Hlth, CK Choi Bldg,251-1855 West Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z2, Canada
[3] George Inst Global Hlth, New Delhi, India
[4] Univ New South Wales, Fac Med, George Inst Global Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] Harvard Univ, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
Regulation; Health workforce; Policy; India; Colonialism; Regulatory councils; Historical analysis; MEDICAL-EDUCATION; DOCTORS;
D O I
10.1186/s12960-021-00640-w
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Regulation is a critical function in the governance of health workforces. In many countries, regulatory councils for health professionals guide the development and implementation of health workforce policy, but struggle to perform their responsibilities, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Few studies have analyzed the influence of colonialism on modern-day regulatory policy for health workforces in LMICs. Drawing on the example of regulatory policy from India, the goals of this paper is to uncover and highlight the colonial legacies of persistent challenges in medical education and practice within the country, and provide lessons for regulatory policy in India and other LMICs. Main body Drawing on peer-reviewed and gray literature, this paper explores the colonial origins of the regulation of medical education and practice in India. We describe three major aspects: (1) Evolution of the structure of the apex regulatory council for doctors-the Medical Council of India (MCI); (2) Reciprocity of medical qualifications between the MCI and the General Medical Council (GMC) in the UK following independence from Britain; (3) Regulatory imbalances between doctors and other cadres, and between biomedicine and Indian systems of medicine. Conclusions Challenges in medical education and professional regulation remain a major obstacle to improve the availability, retention and quality of health workers in India and many other LMICs. We conclude that the colonial origins of regulatory policy in India provide critical insight into contemporary debates regarding reform. From a policy perspective, we need to carefully interrogate why our existing policies are framed in particular ways, and consider whether that framing continues to suit our needs in the twenty-first century.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] Ananthakrishnan N, 2012, NATL MED J INDIA, V25, P101
  • [2] Arnold David., 2000, Science, Technology, and Medicine in Colonial India
  • [3] BANG A, 1986, ECON POLIT WEEKLY, V21, P850
  • [4] TRADITIONAL MEDICINE Is ayurveda the key to universal healthcare in India?
    Bhandari, Neena
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 350
  • [5] Bradfield EW., 1938, An Indian medical review
  • [6] THE MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA
    BUTT, AH
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1946, 2 (4471) : 369 - 372
  • [7] Choudhury P. K., 2016, Economic and Political Weekly, V51, punpaginated
  • [8] Developing the health workforce for universal health coverage
    Cometto, Giorgio
    Buchan, James
    Dussault, Gilles
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, 2020, 98 (02) : 109 - 116
  • [9] In Urban And Rural India, A Standardized Patient Study Showed Low Levels Of Provider Training And Huge Quality Gaps
    Das, Jishnu
    Holla, Alaka
    Das, Veena
    Mohanan, Manoj
    Tabak, Diana
    Chan, Brian
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2012, 31 (12) : 2774 - 2784
  • [10] Das S., 2019, WIRE