Deep learning-based automatic segmentation for size and volumetric measurement of breast cancer on magnetic resonance imaging

被引:26
作者
Yue, Wenyi [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Hongtao [1 ]
Zhou, Juan [1 ]
Li, Guang [3 ]
Tang, Zhe [3 ]
Sun, Zeyu [3 ]
Cai, Jianming [1 ]
Tian, Ning [1 ]
Gao, Shen [1 ]
Dong, Jinghui [1 ]
Liu, Yuan [1 ]
Bai, Xu [1 ]
Sheng, Fugeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Med Ctr 5, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese PLA Gen Med Sch, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Keya Med Technol Co Ltd, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
deep learning; breast cancer; magnetic resonance imaging; volumetric measurement; automatic segmentation; CARCINOMA; MRI;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2022.984626
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: In clinical work, accurately measuring the volume and the size of breast cancer is significant to develop a treatment plan. However, it is time-consuming, and inter- and intra-observer variations among radiologists exist. The purpose of this study was to assess the performance of a Res-UNet convolutional neural network based on automatic segmentation for size and volumetric measurement of mass enhancement breast cancer on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Materials and methods: A total of 1,000 female breast cancer patients who underwent preoperative 1.5-T dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI prior to treatment were selected from January 2015 to October 2021 and randomly divided into a training cohort (n = 800) and a testing cohort (n = 200). Compared with the masks named ground truth delineated manually by radiologists, the model performance on segmentation was evaluated with dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The performance of tumor (T) stage classification was evaluated with accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Results: In the test cohort, the DSC of automatic segmentation reached 0.89. Excellent concordance (ICC > 0.95) of the maximal and minimal diameter and good concordance (ICC > 0.80) of volumetric measurement were shown between the model and the radiologists. The trained model took approximately 10-15 s to provide automatic segmentation and classified the T stage with an overall accuracy of 0.93, sensitivity of 0.94, 0.94, and 0.75, and specificity of 0.95, 0.92, and 0.99, respectively, in T1, T2, and T3. Conclusions: Our model demonstrated good performance and reliability for automatic segmentation for size and volumetric measurement of breast cancer, which can be time-saving and effective in clinical decision-making.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Tumor necrosis by pretreatment breast MRI: association with neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) response in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) [J].
Abdelhafez, Abeer H. ;
Musall, Benjamin C. ;
Adrada, Beatriz E. ;
Hess, KennethR. ;
Son, Jong Bum ;
Hwang, Ken-Pin ;
Candelaria, Rosalind P. ;
Santiago, Lumarie ;
Whitman, Gary J. ;
Le-Petross, Huong T. ;
Moseley, Tanya W. ;
Arribas, Elsa ;
Lane, Deanna L. ;
Scoggins, Marion E. ;
Leung, Jessica W. T. ;
Mahmoud, Hagar S. ;
White, Jason B. ;
Ravenberg, Elizabeth E. ;
Litton, Jennifer K. ;
Valero, Vicente ;
Wei, Peng ;
Thompson, Alastair M. ;
Moulder, Stacy L. ;
Pagel, Mark D. ;
Ma, Jingfei ;
Yang, Wei T. ;
Rauch, Gaiane M. .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2021, 185 (01) :1-12
[2]   AI-enhanced breast imaging: Where are we and where are we heading? [J].
Bitencourt, Almir ;
Naranjo, Isaac Daimiel ;
Lo Gullo, Roberto ;
Saccarelli, Carolina Rossi ;
Pinker, Katja .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 142
[3]   Automated volumetric assessment with artificial neural networks might enable a more accurate assessment of disease burden in patients with multiple sclerosis [J].
Brugnara, Gianluca ;
Isensee, Fabian ;
Neuberger, Ulf ;
Bonekamp, David ;
Petersen, Jens ;
Diem, Ricarda ;
Wildemann, Brigitte ;
Heiland, Sabine ;
Wick, Wolfgang ;
Bendszus, Martin ;
Maier-Hein, Klaus ;
Kickingereder, Philipp .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (04) :2356-2364
[4]   CAD and AI for breast cancer-recent development and challenges [J].
Chan, Heang-Ping ;
Samala, Ravi K. ;
Hadjiiski, Lubomir M. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 93 (1108)
[5]   Comparison of the sensitivity of mammography, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging and combinations of these imaging modalities for the detection of small (≤2 cm) breast cancer [J].
Chen, Hai-long ;
Zhou, Jiao-qun ;
Chen, Qiang ;
Deng, Yong-chuan .
MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (26) :E26531
[6]   CNN-Based Quality Assurance for Automatic Segmentation of Breast Cancer in Radiotherapy [J].
Chen, Xinyuan ;
Men, Kuo ;
Chen, Bo ;
Tang, Yu ;
Zhang, Tao ;
Wang, Shulian ;
Li, Yexiong ;
Dai, Jianrong .
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 10
[7]   Artificial Intelligence-Based Classification of Breast Lesions Imaged With a Multiparametric Breast MRI Protocol With Ultrafast DCE-MRI, T2, and DWI [J].
Dalmis, Mehmet U. ;
Gubern-Merida, Albert ;
Vreemann, Suzan ;
Bult, Peter ;
Karssemeijer, Nico ;
Mann, Ritse ;
Teuwen, Jonas .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2019, 54 (06) :325-332
[8]   Preoperative prediction of the size of pure ductal carcinoma in situ using three imaging modalities as compared to histopathological size: does magnetic resonance imaging add value? [J].
Daniel, Ojuka Kinyuru ;
Lim, Sung Mook ;
Kim, Joo Heung ;
Park, Hyung Seok ;
Park, Seho ;
Kim, Seung Il .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2017, 164 (02) :437-444
[9]   Feasibility of quantitative and volumetric enhancement measurement to assess tumor response in patients with breast cancer after early neoadjuvant chemotherapy [J].
Ding, Jie ;
Xiao, Hongyan ;
Deng, Weiwei ;
Liu, Fengjiao ;
Zhu, Rongrong ;
Ha, Ruoshui .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 49 (03)
[10]   Tumor size and survival in breast cancer-a reappraisal [J].
Foulkes, William D. ;
Reis-Filho, Jorge S. ;
Narod, Steven A. .
NATURE REVIEWS CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 7 (06) :348-353