The opportunities and challenges of personalized genome-based molecular therapies for cancer: targets, technologies, and molecular chaperones

被引:53
|
作者
Workman, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Canc Res, Canc Res UK Ctr Canc Therapeut, Surrey SN2 5NG, England
关键词
molecular pathology and genomics of cancer; new molecular targets; technologies for drug discovery and development; HSP90; molecular; chaperone inhibitors; gefitimb; imatimb; trastuzumab;
D O I
10.1007/s00280-003-0593-0
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
There are now unprecedented opportunities for the development of improved drugs for cancer treatment. Following on from the Human Genome Project, the Cancer Genome Project and related activities will define most of the genes in the majority of common human cancers over the next 5 years. This will provide the opportunity to develop a range of drugs targeted to the precise molecular abnormalities that drive various human cancers and opens up the possibility of personalized therapies targeted to the molecular pathology and genomics of individual patients and their malignancies. The new molecular therapies should be more effective and have less-severe side effects than cytotoxic agents. To develop the new generation of molecular cancer therapeutics as rapidly as possible, it is essential to harness the power of a range of new technologies. These include: genomic and proteomic methodologies (particularly gene expression microarrays); robotic high-throughput screening of diverse compound collections, together with in silico and fragment-based screening techniques; new structural biology methods for rational drug design (especially high-throughput X-ray crystallography and nuclear magnetic resonance); and advanced chemical technologies, including combinatorial and parallel synthesis. Two major challenges to cancer drug discovery are: (1) the ability to convert potent and selective lead compounds with activity by the desired mechanism on tumor cells in culture into agents with robust, drug-like properties, particularly in terms of pharmacokinetic and metabolic properties; and (2) the development of validated pharmacodynamic endpoints and molecular markers of drug response, ideally using noninvasive imaging technologies. The use of various new technologies will be exemplified. A major conceptual and practical issue facing the development and use of the new molecular cancer therapeutics is whether a single drug that targets one of a series of key molecular abnormalities in a particular cancer (e.g. BRAF) will be sufficient on its own to deliver clinical benefit ("house of cards" and tumor addiction models). The alternative scenario is that it will require either a combination of agents or a class of drug that has downstream effects on a range of oncogenic targets. Inhibitors of the heatshock protein (HSP) 90 molecular chaperone are of particular interest in the latter regard, because they offer the potential of inhibiting multiple oncogenic pathways and simultaneous blockade of all six "hallmark traits" of cancer through direct interaction with a single molecular drug target. The first-in-class HSP90 inhibitor 17AAG exhibited good activity in animal models and is now showing evidence of molecular and clinical activity in ongoing clinical trials. Novel HSP90 inhibitors are also being sought. The development of HSP90 inhibitors is used to exemplify the application of new technologies in drug discovery against a novel molecular target, and in particular the need for innovative pharmacodynamic endpoints is emphasized as an essential component of hypothesis-testing clinical trials.
引用
收藏
页码:S45 / S56
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The opportunities and challenges of personalized genome-based molecular therapies for cancer: targets, technologies, and molecular chaperones
    Paul Workman
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 2003, 52 : 45 - 56
  • [2] Molecular pathology of prostate cancer revealed by next-generation sequencing: opportunities for genome-based personalized therapy
    Huang, Jiaoti
    Wang, Jason K.
    Sun, Yin
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2013, 23 (03) : 189 - 193
  • [3] Molecular/Genetic Therapies in Ovarian Cancer: Future Opportunities and Challenges
    Ziebarth, Angela J.
    Landen, Charles N., Jr.
    Alvarez, Ronald D.
    CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 55 (01): : 156 - 172
  • [4] Genome-based and transcriptome-based molecular classification of breast cancer
    Bieche, Ivan
    Lidereau, Rosette
    CURRENT OPINION IN ONCOLOGY, 2011, 23 (01) : 93 - 99
  • [5] Molecular technologies for personalized cancer management
    Hasan, RK
    Wulfkuhle, JD
    Liotta, LA
    Petricoin, EF
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 291 (13): : 1644 - 1645
  • [7] Molecular technologies for biodiversity evaluation: Opportunities and challenges
    Karp, A
    Edwards, KJ
    Bruford, M
    Funk, S
    Vosman, B
    Morgante, M
    Seberg, O
    Kremer, A
    Boursot, P
    Arctander, P
    Tautz, D
    Hewitt, GM
    NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 1997, 15 (07) : 625 - 628
  • [8] Molecular Targets and Therapies for Ampullary Cancer
    Patel, Monica Arun
    Kratz, Jeremy D.
    Carlson, Alexander S.
    Ascencio, Ysaith Orellana
    Kelley, Broc S.
    Loconte, Noelle K.
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2024, 22 (2D):
  • [9] Molecular technologies for biodiversity evaluation: Opportunities and challenges
    Angela Karp
    Keith J. Edwards
    Mike Bruford
    Stephan Funk
    Ben Vosman
    Michele Morgante
    Ole Seberg
    Antoine Kremer
    Pierre Boursot
    Peter Arctander
    Diethard Tautz
    Godfrey M. Hewitt
    Nature Biotechnology, 1997, 15 : 625 - 628
  • [10] Molecular diagnostics and personalized medicine in oncology: Challenges and opportunities
    Normanno, Nicola
    Rachiglio, Anna Maria
    Roma, Cristin
    Fenizia, Francesca
    Esposito, Claudia
    Pasquale, Raffaella
    La Porta, Maria Libera
    Iannaccone, Alessia
    Micheli, Filippo
    Santangelo, Michele
    Bergantino, Francesca
    Costantini, Susan
    De Luca, Antonella
    JOURNAL OF CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY, 2013, 114 (03) : 514 - 524