Skew-normal random-effects model for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studies

被引:2
作者
Negeri, Zelalem F. [1 ]
Beyene, Joseph [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Math & Stat, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Dept Hlth Res Methods Evidence & Impact, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院; 加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
diagnostic test accuracy; meta-analysis; sensitivity; skew-normal random-effects; specificity; MULTIVARIATE METAANALYSIS; BIVARIATE METAANALYSIS; SIMPLEX-METHOD; HETEROGENEITY; SPECIFICITY; SENSITIVITY; OUTLIERS; CURVES;
D O I
10.1002/bimj.201900184
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Hierarchical models are recommended for meta-analyzing diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studies. The bivariate random-effects model is currently widely used to synthesize a pair of test sensitivity and specificity using logit transformation across studies. This model assumes a bivariate normal distribution for the random-effects. However, this assumption is restrictive and can be violated. When the assumption fails, inferences could be misleading. In this paper, we extended the current bivariate random-effects model by assuming a flexible bivariate skew-normal distribution for the random-effects in order to robustly model logit sensitivities and logit specificities. The marginal distribution of the proposed model is analytically derived so that parameter estimation can be performed using standard likelihood methods. The method of weighted-average is adopted to estimate the overall logit-transformed sensitivity and specificity. An extensive simulation study is carried out to investigate the performance of the proposed model compared to other standard models. Overall, the proposed model performs better in terms of confidence interval width of the average logit-transformed sensitivity and specificity compared to the standard bivariate linear mixed model and bivariate generalized linear mixed model. Simulations have also shown that the proposed model performed better than the well-established bivariate linear mixed model in terms of bias and comparable with regards to the root mean squared error (RMSE) of the between-study (co)variances. The proposed method is also illustrated using a published meta-analysis data.
引用
收藏
页码:1223 / 1244
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Multivariate random-effects meta-analysis
    White, Ian R.
    STATA JOURNAL, 2009, 9 (01) : 40 - 56
  • [22] Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist
    Salameh, Jean-Paul
    Bossuyt, Patrick M.
    McGrath, Trevor A.
    Thombs, Brett D.
    Hyde, Christopher J.
    Macaskill, Petra
    Deeks, Jonathan J.
    Leeflang, Mariska
    Korevaar, Daniel A.
    Whiting, Penny
    Takwoingi, Yemisi
    Reitsma, Johannes B.
    Cohen, Jeremie F.
    Frank, Robert A.
    Hunt, Harriet A.
    Hooft, Lotty
    Rutjes, Anne W. S.
    Willis, Brian H.
    Gatsonis, Constantine
    Levis, Brooke
    Moher, David
    McInnes, Matthew D. F.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 370
  • [23] Random Effects Models in a Meta-Analysis of the Accuracy of Two Diagnostic Tests Without a Gold Standard
    Chu, Haitao
    Chen, Sining
    Louis, Thomas A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2009, 104 (486) : 512 - 523
  • [24] A pseudo-likelihood approach for multivariate meta-analysis of test accuracy studies with multiple thresholds
    Guolo, Annamaria
    Duc-Khanh To
    STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 30 (01) : 204 - 220
  • [25] A SIMEX approach for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies with attention to ROC curves
    Guolo, Annamaria
    Cabrera, Tania Erika Pesantez
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOSTATISTICS, 2023, 19 (02) : 455 - 471
  • [26] A simple and robust method for multivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy
    Chen, Yong
    Liu, Yulun
    Chu, Haitao
    Lee, Mei-Ling Ting
    Schmid, Christopher H.
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2017, 36 (01) : 105 - 121
  • [27] Influence diagnostics and outlier detection for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy
    Matsushima, Yuki
    Noma, Hisashi
    Yamada, Tomohide
    Furukawa, Toshi A.
    RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2020, 11 (02) : 237 - 247
  • [28] The clock drawing test: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy
    Park, JinKyung
    Jeong, EunHye
    Seomun, GyeongAe
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2018, 74 (12) : 2742 - 2754
  • [29] On random-effects meta-analysis
    Zeng, D.
    Lin, D. Y.
    BIOMETRIKA, 2015, 102 (02) : 281 - 294
  • [30] Random-effects meta-analysis: the number of studies matters
    Guolo, Annamaria
    Varin, Cristiano
    STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2017, 26 (03) : 1500 - 1518