Complete versus selective portal triad clamping for minor liver resections - A prospective randomized trial

被引:111
|
作者
Figueras, J [1 ]
Llado, L [1 ]
Ruiz, D [1 ]
Ramos, E [1 ]
Busquets, J [1 ]
Rafecas, A [1 ]
Torras, J [1 ]
Fabregat, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Barcelona, Hosp Univ Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.sla.0000157168.26021.b8
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the feasibility, safety, efficacy, amount of hemorrhage, postoperative complications, and ischemic injury of selective clamping in patients undergoing minor liver resections. Summary Background Data: Inflow occlusion can reduce blood loss during hepatectomy. However, Pringle maneuver produces ischemic injury to the remaining liver. Selective hemiliepatic vascular occlusion technique can reduce the severity of visceral congestion and total liver ischemia. Patients and Methods: Eighty patients undergoing minor hepatic resection were randomly assigned to complete clamping (CC) or selective clamping (SC). Hemodynamic parameters, including portal pressure and the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG), were evaluated. The amount of blood loss, measurements of liver enzymes alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and postoperative evolution were also recorded. Results: No differences were observed in the amount of hemorrhage (671 +/- 533 mL versus 735 +/- 397 mL; P = 0.54) or the patients that required transfusion (10% versus 15%; P = 0.55). There were no differences on postoperative morbidity between groups (38% versus 29%; P = 0.38). Cirrhotic patients with CC had significantly higher ALT (7.7 +/- 4.6 versus 4.5 +/- 2.7 mu kat/L, P = 0.01) and AST (10.2 +/- 8.7 versus 4.9 +/- 2.1 mu kat/L; P = 0.03) values on the first postoperative day than SC. The multivariate analysis demonstrated that high central venous pressure, HVPG > 10 mm Hg, and intraoperative blood loss were independent factors related to morbidity. Conclusions: Both techniques of clamping are equally effective and feasible for patients with normal liver and undergoing minor hepatectomies. However, in cirrhotic patients selective clamping induces less ischemic injury and should be recommended. Finally, even for minor hepatic resections, central venous pressure, HVPG, and intraoperative blood loss are factors related to morbidity and should be considered.
引用
收藏
页码:582 / 590
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Effect of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Patients Undergoing Hepatectomy With Portal Triad Clamping: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Liu, Xiaoqing
    Cao, Longhui
    Zhang, Tianhua
    Guo, Rongping
    Lin, Wenqian
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2019, 129 (06): : 1742 - 1748
  • [12] Continuous portal triad clamping in hepatectomy for primary liver cancer with chronic liver disease: A prospective controlled study.
    Wang, Yi
    Wang, Wei
    Ge, Ruiliang
    Yuan, Lei
    Sun, Yanfu
    Wei, Gongtian
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (15)
  • [13] Optimal cycle of intermittent portal triad clamping during liver resection in the murine liver
    Kang, KJ
    Jang, JH
    Lim, TJ
    Kang, Y
    Park, KK
    Lee, IS
    Clavien, PA
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 10 (06) : 794 - 801
  • [14] Intermittent portal triad clamping in resection of liver tumors involving the hepatocaval confluence
    Yi Wang
    Han Chen
    Yan-Fu Sun
    Gong-Tian Wei
    Meng-Chao Wu From the Second Department of Hepatic Surgery
    Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International, 2002, (02) : 276 - 280
  • [15] Effects of portal triad clamping on haemodynamic conditions during laparoscopic liver resection
    Decailliot, F
    Cherqui, D
    Leroux, B
    Lanteri-Minet, M
    Ben Saïd, S
    Husson, E
    Duvaldestin, P
    Stéphan, F
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2001, 87 (03) : 493 - 496
  • [16] Portal triad clamping versus other methods of vascular control in liver resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Richardson, Arthur J.
    Laurence, Jerome M.
    Lam, Vincent W. T.
    HPB, 2012, 14 (06) : 355 - 364
  • [17] Comparison of Suction Versus Nonsuction Drainage After Lung Resections: A Prospective Randomized Trial
    Gocyk, Wojciech
    Kuzdzal, Jarosaw
    Wlodarczyk, Janusz
    Grochowski, Zbigniew
    Gil, Tomasz
    Warmus, Janusz
    Kocon, Piotr
    Talar, Piotr
    Obarski, Piotr
    Trybalski, Lukasz
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2016, 102 (04): : 1119 - 1124
  • [18] CONTEMPORANEOUS PORTAL AND ARTERIAL VERSUS PORTAL REPERFUSION DURING LIVER TRANSPLANTATION: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY
    Baccarani, Umberto
    Adani, Gian Luigi
    Rossetto, Anna
    Lorenzin, Dario
    Costa, Maria Gabriella
    Comuzzi, Chiara
    Bresadola, Vittorio
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 23 : 1 - 1
  • [19] Laparoscopic liver resection without portal clamping: a prospective evaluation
    Carlo Pulitanò
    Marco Catena
    Marcella Arru
    Eleonora Guzzetti
    Laura Comotti
    Gianfranco Ferla
    Luca Aldrighetti
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2008, 22 : 2196 - 2200
  • [20] Ischemic preconditioning versus intermittent vascular occlusion in liver resections performed under selective vascular exclusion: a prospective randomized study
    Smyrniotis, Vassilios
    Theodoraki, Kassiani
    Arkadopoulos, Nikolaos
    Fragulidis, Georgios
    Condi-Pafiti, Agathi
    Plemenou-Fragou, Matrona
    Voros, Dionysios
    Vassiliou, John
    Dimakakos, Panagiotis
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2006, 192 (05): : 669 - 674