Complete versus selective portal triad clamping for minor liver resections - A prospective randomized trial

被引:111
|
作者
Figueras, J [1 ]
Llado, L [1 ]
Ruiz, D [1 ]
Ramos, E [1 ]
Busquets, J [1 ]
Rafecas, A [1 ]
Torras, J [1 ]
Fabregat, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Barcelona, Hosp Univ Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.sla.0000157168.26021.b8
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the feasibility, safety, efficacy, amount of hemorrhage, postoperative complications, and ischemic injury of selective clamping in patients undergoing minor liver resections. Summary Background Data: Inflow occlusion can reduce blood loss during hepatectomy. However, Pringle maneuver produces ischemic injury to the remaining liver. Selective hemiliepatic vascular occlusion technique can reduce the severity of visceral congestion and total liver ischemia. Patients and Methods: Eighty patients undergoing minor hepatic resection were randomly assigned to complete clamping (CC) or selective clamping (SC). Hemodynamic parameters, including portal pressure and the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG), were evaluated. The amount of blood loss, measurements of liver enzymes alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and postoperative evolution were also recorded. Results: No differences were observed in the amount of hemorrhage (671 +/- 533 mL versus 735 +/- 397 mL; P = 0.54) or the patients that required transfusion (10% versus 15%; P = 0.55). There were no differences on postoperative morbidity between groups (38% versus 29%; P = 0.38). Cirrhotic patients with CC had significantly higher ALT (7.7 +/- 4.6 versus 4.5 +/- 2.7 mu kat/L, P = 0.01) and AST (10.2 +/- 8.7 versus 4.9 +/- 2.1 mu kat/L; P = 0.03) values on the first postoperative day than SC. The multivariate analysis demonstrated that high central venous pressure, HVPG > 10 mm Hg, and intraoperative blood loss were independent factors related to morbidity. Conclusions: Both techniques of clamping are equally effective and feasible for patients with normal liver and undergoing minor hepatectomies. However, in cirrhotic patients selective clamping induces less ischemic injury and should be recommended. Finally, even for minor hepatic resections, central venous pressure, HVPG, and intraoperative blood loss are factors related to morbidity and should be considered.
引用
收藏
页码:582 / 590
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Complete versus selective portal triad clamping for minor liver resections
    Königsrainer, I
    Ladurner, R
    Steurer, W
    Königsrainer, A
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2006, 243 (01) : 137 - 138
  • [2] Complete versus selective portal triad clamping for minor liver resections - Reply
    Figueras, J
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2006, 243 (01) : 138 - 138
  • [3] A prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing intermittent portal triad clamping versus ischemic preconditioning with continuous clamping for major liver resection
    Petrowsky, Henrik
    McCormack, Lucas
    Trujillo, Martha
    Selzner, Markus
    Jochum, Wolfram
    Clavien, Pierre-Alain
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2006, 244 (06) : 921 - 930
  • [4] Continuous versus intermittent portal triad clamping during hepatectomy in cirrhosis.: Results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial
    Capussotti, L
    Nuzzo, G
    Polastri, R
    Giuliante, F
    Muratore, A
    Giovannini, I
    HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2003, 50 (52) : 1073 - 1077
  • [5] Prospective Randomized Trial of Intermittent Portal Triad Clamping vs. No Clamping in Donor Right Hepatectomy.
    Dayangac, Murat
    Taner, Burcin C.
    Balci, Deniz
    Duran, Cihan
    Akin, Baris
    Killi, Refik
    Yuzer, Yildiray
    Tokat, Yaman
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 10 : 102 - 103
  • [6] Continuous versus intermittent portal triad clamping for liver resection -: A controlled study
    Belghiti, J
    Noun, R
    Malafosse, R
    Jagot, P
    Sauvanet, A
    Pierangeli, F
    Marty, J
    Farges, O
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1999, 229 (03) : 369 - 375
  • [7] A prospective randomized trial of selective versus nonselective esophagogastric devascularization for portal hypertension
    Wang, Chao
    Xiao, Liang
    Han, Juan
    Jin, Chang-e
    Peng, Yin
    Yang, Zhen
    JOURNAL OF HUAZHONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2014, 34 (04) : 563 - 568
  • [8] A prospective randomized trial of selective versus nonselective esophagogastric devascularization for portal hypertension
    Chao Wang
    Liang Xiao
    Juan Han
    Chang-e Jin
    Yin Peng
    Zhen Yang
    Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Medical Sciences], 2014, 34 : 563 - 568
  • [9] Ischemic preconditioning versus intermittent clamping of portal triad in liver resection: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Zhu, Ying
    Dong, Jian
    Wang, Wan-Li
    Li, Mu-Xing
    Long, Zhi-Da
    Zhen, Xing-Long
    Lv, Yi
    HEPATOLOGY RESEARCH, 2014, 44 (08) : 878 - 887
  • [10] Ischemic preconditioning provides no additive clinical value in liver resection of cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients under portal triad clamping: A prospective randomized controlled trial
    Ye, Bogen
    Zhao, Hongchuan
    Hou, Hui
    Wang, Guobin
    Liu, Fubao
    Zhao, Yijun
    Zhang, Zhigong
    Xie, Kun
    Zhu, Lixin
    Geng, Xiaoping
    CLINICS AND RESEARCH IN HEPATOLOGY AND GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 38 (04) : 467 - 474