Establishment and seedling growth of big bluestem and switchgrass populations divergently selected for seedling tiller number

被引:13
作者
Smart, AJ
Moser, LE
Vogel, KP
机构
[1] S Dakota State Univ, Dept Anim & Range Sci, Brookings, SD 57007 USA
[2] Univ Nebraska, Dept Agron & Hort, Lincoln, NE 68583 USA
[3] Univ Nebraska, USDA ARS, Lincoln, NE 68583 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2135/cropsci2003.1434
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Selection at the seedling stage in grass breeding would be extremely useful if seedling traits are correlated to desired agronomic traits. The objective of this study was to evaluate seedling morphological development, plant growth, and field establishment of big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii Vitman) and switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) populations that were developed by divergent selection for seedling tiller number while selecting for high shoot weight. Six populations were evaluated: (i) 'Pawnee' big bluestem base, (ii) 'Pathfinder' switchgrass base, (iii) big bluestem multiple tiller, (iv) big bluestem single tiller, (v) switchgrass multiple tiller, and (vi) switchgrass single tiller. Field plots were seeded in spring 1999 and 2000 in a Kennebec silt loam (fine-silty, mixed, superactive, mesic Cumulic Hapludolls). Plants were excavated and evaluated during the growing season for shoot weight, root weight, and morphological stage of shoot and root systems. There were no major population differences in shoot weight, root weight, and morphological root stage. Shoot stage was higher for multiple tiller populations than single tiller populations 6 wk after emergence. Stand counts for all populations exceeded 10 seedlings per linear m of row, which is considered an acceptable stand density, and there were no consistent differences among populations. Populations divergently selected for seedling tiller number did not differ in ability to become established under field conditions because root systems apparently were not altered by the selection for seedling tiller number and weight. These results suggest that selection for high shoot weight did not improve seedling vigor in the field.
引用
收藏
页码:1434 / 1440
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[11]   RECURRENT SELECTION IN BLUE GRAMA .1. SEEDLING WATER-UPTAKE AND SHOOT WEIGHT [J].
NASON, DA ;
CUANY, RL ;
WILSON, AM .
CROP SCIENCE, 1987, 27 (05) :847-851
[12]   GRASS SEEDLING EMERGENCE, MORPHOLOGY, AND ESTABLISHMENT AS AFFECTED BY PLANTING DEPTH [J].
NEWMAN, PR ;
MOSER, LE .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1988, 80 (03) :383-387
[13]   SEEDLING ROOT DEVELOPMENT AND MORPHOLOGY OF COOL-SEASON AND WARM-SEASON FORAGE GRASSES [J].
NEWMAN, PR ;
MOSER, LE .
CROP SCIENCE, 1988, 28 (01) :148-151
[14]  
OBRIEN TR, 2000, THSIS U NEBRASKA LIN
[15]   THE GRASS SEEDLING - WHEN IS IT ESTABLISHED [J].
RIES, RE ;
SVEJCAR, TJ .
JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT, 1991, 44 (06) :574-576
[16]  
*SAS I, 1999, SAS ONL DOC VERS 8
[17]  
SEBOLAI B, 1989, THESIS U NEBRASKA LI
[18]   ROLE OF LEAF APPEARANCE RATE AND THE COLEOPTILE TILLER IN REGULATING TILLER PRODUCTION [J].
SKINNER, RH ;
NELSON, CJ .
CROP SCIENCE, 1994, 34 (01) :71-75
[19]  
SMART AJ, 2001, THESIS U NEBRASKA LI
[20]  
SONG BH, 1990, AGRONOMY ABSTRACTS, P131