Heuristics in Professional Judgement: A Psycho-Social Rationality Model

被引:60
|
作者
Taylor, Brian J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ulster Univ, Coleraine, Londonderry, North Ireland
来源
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK | 2017年 / 47卷 / 04期
关键词
assessment; decision making; decision theory; evidence-based practice; professional judgement; reflective practice; risk; risk assessment; social work; DECISION-MAKING TOOLS; SOCIAL-WORK; CHILD PROTECTION; RISK; KNOWLEDGE; CATEGORIZATION; FAMILIES; CHOICE; CARE;
D O I
10.1093/bjsw/bcw084
中图分类号
C916 [社会工作、社会管理、社会规划];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
There is increasing attention to decision making in social work as we become more concerned about 'risk' and the most effective design of assessment tools to aid professional judgement. In order to develop practice, a better conceptual understanding is required of the cognitive processes in making these judgements. This paper explores the potential use of heuristic (small-scale, 'rule-of-thumb') models of cognitive judgement in social work, recognising that human beings (including social work professionals) cannot simultaneously process large numbers of factors with associated statistical weightings. This paper discusses heuristic models of professional judgement based on a proposed concept of psycho-social rationality. Such heuristic models would take account of the psycho-social environment in which the decision is being made as well as of the cognitive processes of the decision maker. The potential application to professional judgement in social work is discussed with reference to examples of various types of social work decision. Potential issues in developing and adopting this theoretical approach in practice are raised-including legal dimensions and potential bias-and the implications for social work research are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:1043 / 1060
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条