The biomechanical effects of kyphoplasty on treated and adjacent nontreated vertebral bodies

被引:99
作者
Villarraga, ML
Bellezza, AJ
Harrigan, TP
Cripton, PA
Kurtz, SM
Edidin, AA
机构
[1] Exponent Inc, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Drexel Univ, Sch Biomed Engn Sci & Hlth Syst, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Univ British Columbia, Dept Mech Engn, Vancouver, BC V6T 1W5, Canada
[4] Kyphon Inc, Sunnyvale, CA USA
来源
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES | 2005年 / 18卷 / 01期
关键词
kyphoplasty; vertebral body; bone cement; stress; finite element analysis;
D O I
10.1097/01.bsd.0000138694.56012.ce
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
It remains unclear whether adjacent vertebral body fractures are related to the natural progression of osteoporosis or if adjacent fractures are a consequence of augmentation with bone cement. Experimental or computational studies have not completely addressed the biomechanical effects of kyphoplasty on adjacent levels immediately following augmentation. This study presents a validated two-functional spinal unit (FSU) T12-L2 finite element model with a simulated kyphoplasty augmentation in L1 to predict stresses and strains within the bone cement and bone of the treated and adjacent nontreated vertebral bodies. The findings from this multiple-FSU study and a recent retrospective clinical study suggest that changes in stresses and strains in levels adjacent to a kyphoplasty-treated level are minimal. Furthermore, the stress and strain levels found in the treated levels are less than injury tolerance limits of cancellous and cortical bone. Therefore, subsequent adjacent level fractures may be related to the underlying etiology (weakening of the bone) rather than the surgical intervention.
引用
收藏
页码:84 / 91
页数:8
相关论文
共 58 条
  • [1] Load shift of the intervertebral disc after a vertebroplasty: a finite-element study
    Baroud, G
    Nemes, J
    Heini, P
    Steffen, T
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2003, 12 (04) : 421 - 426
  • [2] The biomechanics of vertebroplasty - The effect of cement volume on mechanical behavior
    Belkoff, SM
    Mathis, JM
    Jasper, LE
    Deramond, H
    [J]. SPINE, 2001, 26 (14) : 1537 - 1541
  • [3] Biomechanical evaluation of a new bone cement for use in vertebroplasty
    Belkoff, SM
    Mathis, JM
    Erbe, EM
    Fenton, DC
    [J]. SPINE, 2000, 25 (09) : 1061 - 1064
  • [4] Adjacent vertebral failure after vertebroplasty - A biomechanical investigation
    Berlemann, U
    Ferguson, SJ
    Nolte, LP
    Hein, PF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2002, 84B (05): : 748 - 752
  • [5] SEGMENTAL ANALYSIS OF THE SAGITTAL PLANE ALIGNMENT OF THE NORMAL THORACIC AND LUMBAR SPINES AND THORACOLUMBAR JUNCTION
    BERNHARDT, M
    BRIDWELL, KH
    [J]. SPINE, 1989, 14 (07) : 717 - 721
  • [6] Bernhardt Mark, 1997, P185
  • [7] Cao K D, 2001, Spine (Phila Pa 1976), V26, pE253, DOI 10.1097/00007632-200106150-00011
  • [8] Cortet B, 1999, J RHEUMATOL, V26, P2222
  • [9] Kyphoplasty for vertebral compression fractures: 1-year clinical outcomes from a prospective study
    Coumans, JVCE
    Reinhardt, MK
    Lieberman, IH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2003, 99 (01) : 44 - 50
  • [10] Normal vertebral body dimensions: A new measurement method using MRI
    Cyteval, C
    Thomas, E
    Picot, MC
    Derieffy, P
    Blotman, F
    Taourel, P
    [J]. OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2002, 13 (06) : 468 - 473