Conspiracy theories, radicalization and quest for significance

被引:0
作者
Rullo, Marika [1 ]
Fabbri, Loretta [1 ]
Melacarne, Claudio [1 ]
Romano, Alessandra [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Siena, Dipartimento Sci Sociali Polit & Cognit, Via Fieravecchia 19, Siena, Italy
关键词
Significance Quest Theory; conspiracy theories; radicalization; prejudice; education; IDENTITY; UNCERTAINTY; PSYCHOLOGY; TERRORISM; EXTREMISM; BELIEF; MENTALITY; SEARCH; LIFE;
D O I
10.3280/rip2022oa14613
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The Covid-19 pandemic has represented and continues to represent a moment of crisis for many societies worldwide. During times of emergency like this, conspiracy theories spread very quickly as they provide simple explanations to complex events giving the illusion of being in control of an unknown and often frightening reality. Recently there has been an increase in the spread, especially online, of conspiracy theories connected both to the Covid-19 pandemic and to other social events. However, the spread of conspiracy theories can have very serious social consequences such as favoring the flourishing of forms of radicalization. In the present cross-sectional research conducted in Italy (N = 197) we used the Significance Quest Theory (SQT; Kruglanski et al., 2017) to describe how radicalization is connected to the quest for significance that can lead people to embrace a conspiracy mentality which in turn can support radicalized cognitions and behaviors. The results of this study reveal that the relationships between quest for significance and the tendency to radicalization and forms of prejudice towards immigrants, are partly explained by conspiracy thinking. The theoretical-practical implications of this research take into consideration the developments of SQT applied to the understanding of conspiracy thinking and the prefiguration of educational actions to be designed in a transformative perspective.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]   Beliefs in conspiracies [J].
Abalakina-Paap, M ;
Stephan, WG ;
Craig, T ;
Gregory, WL .
POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 20 (03) :637-647
[2]  
Amiraux V., 2020, ED REFLECTIVE PRACTI, V1, P5
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, CONSP THEOR CRIT
[4]  
Antonelli F., 2021, RADICALIZZAZIONE
[5]  
Bailey G. M., 2017, Journal for Deradicalization, V10, P255
[6]   Political paranoia v. political realism: on distinguishing between bogus conspiracy theories and genuine conspiratorial politics [J].
Bale, Jeffrey M. .
PATTERNS OF PREJUDICE, 2007, 41 (01) :45-60
[7]   Effects of misinformation on COVID-19 individual responses and recommendations for resilience of disastrous consequences of misinformation [J].
Barua, Zapan ;
Barua, Sajib ;
Aktar, Salma ;
Kabir, Najma ;
Li, Mingze .
PROGRESS IN DISASTER SCIENCE, 2020, 8
[8]   Science vs Conspiracy: Collective Narratives in the Age of Misinformation [J].
Bessi, Alessandro ;
Coletto, Mauro ;
Davidescu, George Alexandru ;
Scala, Antonio ;
Caldarelli, Guido ;
Quattrociocchi, Walter .
PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (02)
[9]  
Biddlestone M, 2020, CONSPIR THEOR, P219
[10]   The role of conspiracy beliefs for COVID-19 health responses: A meta-analysis [J].
Bierwiaczonek, Kinga ;
Gundersen, Aleksander B. ;
Kunst, Jonas R. .
CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 46