Different tests for a difference: how do we do research?

被引:4
作者
Drummond, Gordon B. [1 ]
Vowler, Sarah L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Royal Infirm, Dept Anaesthesia & Pain Med, Edinburgh EH16 4HA, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Li Ka Shing Ctr, Cambridge Res Inst, Canc Res UK, Cambridge, England
关键词
D O I
10.1152/advan.00121.2011
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
[No abstract available]
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 5
页数:3
相关论文
共 4 条
[1]  
Abelson RP., 1995, Statistics as principled argument
[2]  
COHEN J, 1994, AM PSYCHOL, V49, P997, DOI 10.1037/0003-066X.50.12.1103
[3]   On contemporaneous controls, unlikely outcomes, boxes and replacing the ′Student′: Good statistical practice in pharmacology, problem 3 [J].
Lew, M. J. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2008, 155 (06) :797-803
[4]   Why permutation tests are superior to t and F tests in biomedical research [J].
Ludbrook, J ;
Dudley, H .
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 1998, 52 (02) :127-132