A note on negligence and collusion-proof liability

被引:0
作者
Garmon, C [1 ]
机构
[1] Fed Trade Commiss, Bur Econ, Washington, DC 20001 USA
关键词
vicarious liability; negligence;
D O I
10.1016/j.irle.2005.06.006
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Principals are often held at least partially liable for the accidental harm caused by their agents. If the liability of the principal and agent is contingent on the court's establishment of the agent's negligence, the principal has an incentive to withhold evidence of the agent's negligence. Since the principal is often in the best position to monitor the agent and gather such evidence, this can lead the agent to take insufficient care in avoiding accidents. This paper will show that a collusion-proof liability scheme gives the principal no incentive to withhold evidence and induces the same level of preventive care as strict vicarious liability. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:256 / 263
页数:8
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
CHU CYC, 1995, INT REV LAW ECON, V15, P305
[2]  
DOBBS D, 2001, LAW TORTS
[3]  
Feess Eberhard, 1999, EUROPEAN J LAW EC, V8, P231
[4]  
FOLKENRO.JC, 1973, LA LAW REV, V34, P79
[5]  
FRANKLIN M, 1987, TORT LAW ALTERNATIVE
[6]  
GARMON C, 1997, ESSAYS EC VICARIOUS
[7]  
HENDERSON JA, 1988, TORTS PROCESS
[8]   OPTIMAL LAW-ENFORCEMENT WITH SELF-REPORTING OF BEHAVIOR [J].
KAPLOW, L ;
SHAVELL, S .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1994, 102 (03) :583-606
[9]   AN ECONOMIC-ANALYSIS OF THE CHOICE BETWEEN ENTERPRISE AND PERSONAL LIABILITY FOR ACCIDENTS [J].
KORNHAUSER, LA .
CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW, 1982, 70 (06) :1345-1392
[10]  
Pitchford R, 1995, AM ECON REV, V85, P1171