Transcranial magnetic stimulation of visual cortex in migraine patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis

被引:49
作者
Brigo, Francesco [1 ,2 ]
Storti, Monica [3 ]
Nardone, Raffaele [2 ,4 ]
Fiaschi, Antonio [1 ]
Bongiovanni, Luigi Giuseppe [1 ]
Tezzon, Frediano [2 ]
Manganotti, Paolo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Verona, Dept Neurol Neuropsychol Morphol & Movement Sci, Sect Clin Neurol, I-37134 Verona, Italy
[2] Franz Tappeiner Hosp, Dept Neurol, Merano, Italy
[3] Univ Verona, Dept Med, I-37100 Verona, Italy
[4] Paracelsus Med Univ, Christian Doppler Klin, Dept Neurol, Salzburg, Austria
关键词
Meta-analysis; Migraine; Phosphenes; Systematic review; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; OCCIPITAL CORTEX; PHOSPHENE THRESHOLDS; CORTICAL EXCITABILITY; EVOKED-POTENTIALS; MOTOR; SINGLE; AURA; HYPEREXCITABILITY;
D O I
10.1007/s10194-012-0445-6
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
We systematically reviewed the literature to evaluate the prevalence of phosphenes and the phosphene threshold (PT) values obtained during single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in adults with migraine. Controlled studies measuring PT by single-pulse TMS in adults with migraine with or without aura (MA, MwA) were systematically searched. Prevalence of phosphenes and PT values were assessed calculating mean difference (MD) and odds ratio (OR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI). Ten trials (277 migraine patients and 193 controls) were included. Patients with MA had statistically significant lower PT compared with controls when a circular coil was used (MD -28.33; 95 % CI -36.09 to -20.58); a similar result was found in MwA patients (MD -17.12; 95 % CI -23.81 to -10.43); using a figure-of-eight coil the difference was not statistically significant. There was a significantly higher phosphene prevalence in MA patients compared with control subjects (OR 4.21; 95 % CI 1.18-15.01). No significant differences were found either in phosphene reporting between patients with MwA and controls, or in PT values obtained with a figure-of-eight coil in MA and MwA patients versus controls. Overall considered, these results support the hypothesis of a primary visual cortex hyper-excitability in MA, providing not enough evidence for MwA. A significant statistical heterogeneity reflects clinical and methodological differences across studies, and higher temporal variabilities among PT measurements over time, related to unstable excitability levels. Patients should therefore be evaluated in the true interictal period with an adequate headache-free interval. Furthermore, skull thickness and ovarian cycle should be assessed as possible confounding variables, and sham stimulation should be performed to reduce the rate of false positives. Phosphene prevalence alone cannot be considered a measure of cortical excitability, but should be integrated with PT evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 349
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation on migraine: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trails
    Lihuan Lan
    Xiaoni Zhang
    Xiangpen Li
    Xiaoming Rong
    Ying Peng
    The Journal of Headache and Pain, 2017, 18
  • [42] Therapeutic effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on cognitive impairment in stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gong, Cheng
    Hu, Hao
    Peng, Xu-Miao
    Li, Hai
    Xiao, Li
    Liu, Zhen
    Zhong, Yan-Biao
    Wang, Mao-Yuan
    Luo, Yun
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2023, 17
  • [43] Efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation in anorexia nervosa: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bahadori, Amir Reza
    Javadnia, Parisa
    Bordbar, Sanaz
    Zafari, Rasa
    Taherkhani, Tina
    Davari, Afshan
    Tafakhori, Abbas
    Shafiee, Sajad
    Ranji, Sara
    EATING AND WEIGHT DISORDERS-STUDIES ON ANOREXIA BULIMIA AND OBESITY, 2025, 30 (01)
  • [44] The effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on empathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yang, C. -C.
    Khalifa, N.
    Vollm, B.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2018, 48 (05) : 737 - 750
  • [45] The effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation on cognitive function in post-stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhu, Mingjin
    Huang, Siyu
    Chen, Wenjun
    Pan, Guoyuan
    Zhou, Yibo
    BMC NEUROLOGY, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [46] Efficacy and tolerability of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for late-life depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Min
    Mo, Junjian
    Zhang, Huiying
    Tang, Yaoyin
    Guo, Kaiheng
    OuYang, Xinyue
    Huang, Linghua
    Zhong, Xiaomei
    Ning, Yuping
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2023, 323 : 219 - 231
  • [47] Prevalence of Adverse Effects Associated With Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Huashuang, Zhang
    Yang, Li
    Chensheng, Hou
    Jing, Xin
    Bo, Chen
    Dongming, Zhang
    Kangfu, Liang
    Shi-Bin, Wang
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 13
  • [48] Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Patients With Tinnitus: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
    Wang, Tang-Chuan
    Tyler, Richard S.
    Chang, Ta-Yuan
    Chen, Jui-Cheng
    Lin, Chia-Der
    Chung, Hsiung-Kwang
    Tsou, Yung-An
    ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 2018, 127 (02) : 79 - 88
  • [49] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as an alternative therapy for stroke with spasticity: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xu, Peng
    Huang, Yan
    Wang, Jie
    An, Xu
    Zhang, Tianyou
    Li, Yuechun
    Zhang, Jun
    Wang, Baojun
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2021, 268 (11) : 4013 - 4022
  • [50] Efficacy and Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Cerebellar Ataxia: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Qiu, Yi-Tong
    Chen, Yi
    Tan, Hui-Xin
    Su, Wei
    Guo, Qi-Fan
    Gao, Qiang
    CEREBELLUM, 2024, 23 (01) : 243 - 254