Transcranial magnetic stimulation of visual cortex in migraine patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis

被引:49
作者
Brigo, Francesco [1 ,2 ]
Storti, Monica [3 ]
Nardone, Raffaele [2 ,4 ]
Fiaschi, Antonio [1 ]
Bongiovanni, Luigi Giuseppe [1 ]
Tezzon, Frediano [2 ]
Manganotti, Paolo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Verona, Dept Neurol Neuropsychol Morphol & Movement Sci, Sect Clin Neurol, I-37134 Verona, Italy
[2] Franz Tappeiner Hosp, Dept Neurol, Merano, Italy
[3] Univ Verona, Dept Med, I-37100 Verona, Italy
[4] Paracelsus Med Univ, Christian Doppler Klin, Dept Neurol, Salzburg, Austria
关键词
Meta-analysis; Migraine; Phosphenes; Systematic review; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; OCCIPITAL CORTEX; PHOSPHENE THRESHOLDS; CORTICAL EXCITABILITY; EVOKED-POTENTIALS; MOTOR; SINGLE; AURA; HYPEREXCITABILITY;
D O I
10.1007/s10194-012-0445-6
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
We systematically reviewed the literature to evaluate the prevalence of phosphenes and the phosphene threshold (PT) values obtained during single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in adults with migraine. Controlled studies measuring PT by single-pulse TMS in adults with migraine with or without aura (MA, MwA) were systematically searched. Prevalence of phosphenes and PT values were assessed calculating mean difference (MD) and odds ratio (OR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI). Ten trials (277 migraine patients and 193 controls) were included. Patients with MA had statistically significant lower PT compared with controls when a circular coil was used (MD -28.33; 95 % CI -36.09 to -20.58); a similar result was found in MwA patients (MD -17.12; 95 % CI -23.81 to -10.43); using a figure-of-eight coil the difference was not statistically significant. There was a significantly higher phosphene prevalence in MA patients compared with control subjects (OR 4.21; 95 % CI 1.18-15.01). No significant differences were found either in phosphene reporting between patients with MwA and controls, or in PT values obtained with a figure-of-eight coil in MA and MwA patients versus controls. Overall considered, these results support the hypothesis of a primary visual cortex hyper-excitability in MA, providing not enough evidence for MwA. A significant statistical heterogeneity reflects clinical and methodological differences across studies, and higher temporal variabilities among PT measurements over time, related to unstable excitability levels. Patients should therefore be evaluated in the true interictal period with an adequate headache-free interval. Furthermore, skull thickness and ovarian cycle should be assessed as possible confounding variables, and sham stimulation should be performed to reduce the rate of false positives. Phosphene prevalence alone cannot be considered a measure of cortical excitability, but should be integrated with PT evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 349
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Transcranial magnetic stimulation in anxiety and trauma-related disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cirillo, Patricia
    Gold, Alexandra K.
    Nardi, Antonio E.
    Ornelas, Ana C.
    Nierenberg, Andrew A.
    Camprodon, Joan
    Kinrys, Gustavo
    BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR, 2019, 9 (06):
  • [22] The Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Dysphagia After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yang, Weiwei
    Cao, Xiongbin
    Zhang, Xiaoyun
    Wang, Xuebing
    Li, Xiaowen
    Huai, Yaping
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 15
  • [23] Transcranial direct current stimulation for migraine: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Hong, Peiwei
    Liu, Yao
    Wan, Yang
    Xiong, Hai
    Xu, Yanming
    CNS NEUROSCIENCE & THERAPEUTICS, 2022, 28 (07) : 992 - 998
  • [24] Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on improvement of cognition in elderly patients with cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cheng, Calvin Pak Wing
    Wong, Corine Sau Man
    Lee, Kelsey Kimyin
    Chan, Alfred Pui Kam
    Yeung, Jerry Wing Fai
    Chan, Wai Chi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 33 (01) : E1 - E13
  • [25] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for lower extremity motor function in patients with stroke: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Xie, Yun-Juan
    Chen, Yi
    Tan, Hui-Xin
    Guo, Qi-Fan
    Lau, Benson Wui-Man
    Gao, Qiang
    NEURAL REGENERATION RESEARCH, 2021, 16 (06) : 1168 - 1176
  • [26] Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on aphasia in stroke patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Jun
    Zhong, Dongling
    Xiao, Xili
    Yuan, Li
    Li, Yuxi
    Zheng, Yaling
    Li, Juan
    Liu, Tianyu
    Jin, Rongjiang
    CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2021, 35 (08) : 1103 - 1116
  • [27] Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Fibromyalgia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Knijnik, Leonardo M.
    Dussan-Sarria, Jairo A.
    Rozisky, Joanna R.
    Torres, Iraci L. S.
    Brunoni, Andre R.
    Fregni, Felipe
    Caumo, Wolnei
    PAIN PRACTICE, 2016, 16 (03) : 294 - 304
  • [28] Effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation in modulating cortical excitability in patients with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhongfei Bai
    Jiaqi Zhang
    Kenneth N. K. Fong
    Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 19
  • [29] Effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation in modulating cortical excitability in patients with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bai, Zhongfei
    Zhang, Jiaqi
    Fong, Kenneth N. K.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROENGINEERING AND REHABILITATION, 2022, 19 (01)
  • [30] Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for Tourette syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hsu, Chih-Wei
    Wang, Liang-Jen
    Lin, Pao-Yen
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2018, 11 (05) : 1110 - 1118