Multilevel Job Demands and Resources: Cross-Level Effects of Competing Organizational Facet-Specific Climates on Risky Safety Behaviors

被引:10
作者
Ghezzi, Valerio [1 ]
Probst, Tahira M. [2 ]
Petitta, Laura [1 ]
Barbaranelli, Claudio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rome, Dept Psychol & Sapienza, I-00146 Rome, Italy
[2] Washington State Univ WSU, Dept Psychol, Vancouver, WA 98686 USA
关键词
multilevel modeling; organizational production pressure climate; organizational safety climate; risky safety behaviors; workload; PSYCHOLOGICAL CLIMATE; WORKPLACE SAFETY; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; WORK PRESSURE; PERFORMANCE; OUTCOMES; MODEL; ATTITUDES; IMPACT; ROLES;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph17103496
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Both individual demands (i.e., workload) and organizational demands and resources (i.e., production pressure and safety climates) may affect the likelihood that employees undertake risky safety behaviors in different ways. Adopting an organizational multilevel perspective, the aim of the present research was fourfold: (1) to examine the impact of individual-level job demands (i.e., workload) on the enactment of risky safety behaviors; (2) to evaluate the effects of coexisting and competing organizational facet-specific climates (i.e., for safety and for production pressure) on the above outcome; (3) to assess their cross-level interactions with individual job demands, and (4) to test the interaction among such organizational demands and resources in shaping risky behaviors. A series of multilevel regression models tested on surveydata from 1375 employees nested within 33 organizations indicated that high workload increases the likelihood of employees enacting risky safety behaviors, while organizational safety and production pressure climates showed significant and opposite direct effects on this safety outcome. Moreover, organizational safety climate significantly mitigated the effect of individual job demands on risky safety behaviors, while organizational production pressure climate exacerbated this individual-level relationship. Finally, organizational safety climate mitigates the cross-level direct effect of organizational production pressure climate on the enactment of risky safety behaviors.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 102 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, PSYCHOL FATIGUE WORK, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139015394
[2]  
Bakker A. B., 2007, J MANAGERIAL PSYCHOL, V22, P309, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115, DOI 10.1108/02683940710733115]
[3]  
Bakker AB., 2018, Handbook of Well-Being, P1, DOI DOI 10.1108/02683940710733115
[4]   Positive organizational behavior: Engaged employees in flourishing organizations [J].
Bakker, Arnold B. ;
Schaufelf, Wilmar B. .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2008, 29 (02) :147-154
[5]   Job Demands-Resources Theory: Taking Stock and Looking Forward [J].
Bakker, Arnold B. ;
Demerouti, Evangelia .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 22 (03) :273-285
[6]  
Bakker AB, 2015, EUR J WORK ORGAN PSY, V24, P839
[7]   Does safety climate predict safety performance in Italy and the USA? Cross-cultural validation of a theoretical model of safety climate [J].
Barbaranelli, Claudio ;
Petitta, Laura ;
Probst, Tahira M. .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2015, 77 :35-44
[8]   VARIOUS INTRACLASS CORRELATION RELIABILITY COEFFICIENTS [J].
BARTKO, JJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1976, 83 (05) :762-765
[9]   Workplace safety: A review and research synthesis [J].
Beus, Jeremy M. ;
McCord, Mallory A. ;
Zohar, Dov .
ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2016, 6 (04) :352-381
[10]   Within-group agreement: On the use (and misuse) of rWG and rWG(J) in leadership research and some best practice guidelines [J].
Biemann, Torsten ;
Cole, Michael S. ;
Voelpel, Sven .
LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2012, 23 (01) :66-80