Maximum magnitude estimation considering the regional rupture character

被引:33
作者
Anbazhagan, P. [1 ,2 ]
Bajaj, Ketan [1 ]
Moustafa, Sayed S. R. [2 ,3 ]
Al-Arifi, Nassir S. N. [2 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Sci, Dept Civil Engn, Bangalore 560012, Karnataka, India
[2] King Saud Univ, Dept Geol & Geophys, Fac Sci, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
[3] Natl Res Inst Astron & Geophys NRIAG, Seismol Dept, Cairo 11421, Egypt
关键词
Maximum earthquake magnitude (M-max); Regional rupture characteristics; a" and "b" G-R parameters; Magnitude of completeness; Maximum observed magnitude (M-max(obs)); EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE; CODA-Q; UNITED-STATES; COMPLETENESS; CATALOGS; SEISMICITY; EXAMPLES; SITE;
D O I
10.1007/s10950-015-9488-x
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
The main objective of the paper is to develop a new method to estimate the maximum magnitude (M (max)) considering the regional rupture character. The proposed method has been explained in detail and examined for both intraplate and active regions. Seismotectonic data has been collected for both the regions, and seismic study area (SSA) map was generated for radii of 150, 300, and 500 km. The regional rupture character was established by considering percentage fault rupture (PFR), which is the ratio of subsurface rupture length (RLD) to total fault length (TFL). PFR is used to arrive RLD and is further used for the estimation of maximum magnitude for each seismic source. Maximum magnitude for both the regions was estimated and compared with the existing methods for determining M (max) values. The proposed method gives similar M (max) value irrespective of SSA radius and seismicity. Further seismicity parameters such as magnitude of completeness (M (c) ), "a" and "aEuro parts per thousand b " parameters and maximum observed magnitude (M (max) (obs) ) were determined for each SSA and used to estimate M (max) by considering all the existing methods. It is observed from the study that existing deterministic and probabilistic M (max) estimation methods are sensitive to SSA radius, M (c) , a and b parameters and M (max) (obs) values. However, M (max) determined from the proposed method is a function of rupture character instead of the seismicity parameters. It was also observed that intraplate region has less PFR when compared to active seismic region.
引用
收藏
页码:695 / 719
页数:25
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Representative seismic hazard map of Coimbatore, India [J].
Anbazhagan, P. ;
Smitha, C. V. ;
Kumar, Abhishek .
ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2014, 171 :81-95
[2]   Estimation of design basis earthquake using region-specific Mmax, for the NPP site at Kalpakkam, Tamil Nadu, India [J].
Anbazhagan, P. ;
Smitha, C., V ;
Kumar, Abhishek ;
Chandran, Deepu .
NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2013, 259 :41-64
[3]  
Anderson JG, 1996, B SEISMOL SOC AM, V86, P683
[4]  
[Anonymous], NP4726A EL POW RES I
[5]  
[Anonymous], SEISMIC HAZ IN PRESS
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1984, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V1, P33, DOI [10.1193/1.1585255, DOI 10.1193/1.1585255]
[7]  
[Anonymous], GEOPHYS RES B
[8]  
[Anonymous], EVALUATION REGIONAL
[9]   Earthquake ground-motion prediction equations for eastern North America [J].
Atkinson, Gail M. ;
Boore, David M. .
BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2006, 96 (06) :2181-2205
[10]   Seismic hazard across Bulgaria and neighbouring areas: regional and site-specific maximum credible magnitudes and earthquake perceptibility [J].
Bayliss, Thomas J. ;
Burton, Paul W. .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2013, 68 (02) :271-319