Favourable dermal penetration of diclofenac after administration to the skin using a novel spray gel formulation

被引:64
作者
Brunner, M
Dehghanyar, P
Seigfried, B
Martin, W
Menke, G
Müller, M
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Clin Pharmacol, Div Clin Pharmacokinet, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[2] MIKA Pharma GmbH, Limburgerhof, Germany
[3] Pharmakin GmbH, Ulm, Germany
关键词
diclofenac; topical; spray gel; dermal penetration; microdialysis;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2125.2005.02484.x
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Aims The study was designed to evaluate the relative bioavailability of diclofenac in plasma, subcutaneous adipose and skeletal muscle tissue after repeated topical administration using MIKA Diclofenac Spray Gel (4%), a novel formulation, and after oral dosing using VOLTAREN(") 50 mg enteric coated tablets. Methods Diclofenac (48 mg) was administered topically three times daily for 3 days onto a defined area of the thigh of 12 healthy males. After a 14-day wash out period, subjects were orally treated with 50 mg diclofenac three times daily for 3 days. In vivo microdialysis in subcutaneous and muscle tissues was performed immediately after the final doses from both treatments on day 4, and 48 h later. Plasma samples were taken simultaneously. Results The relative bioavailability of diclofenac in subcutaneous adipose and skeletal muscle tissue was substantially higher after topical compared with oral dosing (324% and 209%, respectively) whereas relative plasma bioavailability was 50-fold lower. Plasma C-max values were approximately 250-fold lower after topical compared with oral drug administration (i.e. median values = 4.89 ng mL(-1); 95% CI: 3.37-7.68 and 1240 ng mL(-1); 95% CI: 787-1389 ng mL(-1)). Both treatments were well tolerated. Conclusions Owing to its favourable penetration characteristics and low systemic availability, MIKA Diclofenac Spray Gel 4% is a rational alternative to oral diclofenac formulations for the treatment of inflammatory soft tissue conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:573 / 577
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Arcangeli P, 1996, Riv Eur Sci Med Farmacol, V18, P217
[2]  
ARTMANN C, 1997, 97003 MIKA
[3]   Effect of barrier perturbation on cutaneous penetration of salicylic acid in hairless rats: in vivo pharmacokinetics using microdialysis and non-invasive quantification of barrier function [J].
Benfeldt, E ;
Serup, J .
ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 1999, 291 (09) :517-526
[4]  
Borg N, 1999, ACTA DERM-VENEREOL, V79, P274, DOI 10.1080/000155599750010643
[5]   Clinical pharmacokinetics of diclofenac - Therapeutic insights and pitfalls [J].
Davies, NM ;
Anderson, KE .
CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 1997, 33 (03) :184-213
[6]   TRANSDERMAL DRUG DELIVERY AND CUTANEOUS METABOLISM [J].
GUY, RH ;
HADGRAFT, J ;
BUCKS, DAW .
XENOBIOTICA, 1987, 17 (03) :325-343
[7]   Oral versus topical NSAIDs in rheumatic diseases - A comparison [J].
Heyneman, CA ;
Lawless-Liday, C ;
Wall, GC .
DRUGS, 2000, 60 (03) :555-574
[8]  
LINK R, 2000, PLACEBO CONTROLLED C
[9]   A MICRODIALYSIS METHOD ALLOWING CHARACTERIZATION OF INTERCELLULAR WATER SPACE IN HUMANS [J].
LONNROTH, P ;
JANSSON, PA ;
SMITH, U .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1987, 253 (02) :E228-E231
[10]   Quantitive systematic review of topically applied non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [J].
Moore, RA ;
Tramèr, MR ;
Carroll, D ;
Wiffen, PJ ;
McQuay, HJ .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 316 (7128) :333-338