Transformations of elemental mercury to inorganic and organic forms in mercury and hydrocarbon co-contaminated soils

被引:56
作者
Renneberg, AJ [1 ]
Dudas, MJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Renewable Resources, Edmonton, AB T6E 2E3, Canada
关键词
chemical extraction; distribution; hydrocarbons; mercury; contaminated soil; transformation products;
D O I
10.1016/S0045-6535(01)00122-9
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
There are many industrial sites, such as gas processing plants, that are contaminated with both mercury and hydrocarbons. These sites tend to be localized but can have very high concentrations of mercury in the soil and heterogeneous distribution of hydrocarbons. The original form of mercury in many cases was elemental mercury from broken manometers. Over time the mercury has become redistributed within soil and has undergone chemical transformations into new forms. The forms of mercury will govern the chemical behavior and the availability of the mercury to biological receptors. The availability of the mercury is important as it will govern the risk associated with the contaminated soil and will also determine the effectiveness of any attempts at remediation. In the present study a chemical extraction protocol was used to determine the forms of mercury in soil originally contaminated by spillage of elemental mercury and petroleum hydrocarbons. Chemical extractions have been used in the past to determine the forms of mercury in uncontaminated soils and several researchers have used them to study contaminated soils. However, to date, no researchers have studied the forms of mercury in soils following years of weathering of elemental mercury after a spill. This study shows that decades after the original spill the elemental mercury has transformed and is dominantly (up to 85%) associated with soil organic matter, and to a lesser extent the mineral fraction of soil. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1103 / 1109
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
ANDERSSON A, 1979, TOPICS ENV HLTH, V3, P79
[2]  
Andren M. O, 1979, BIOGEOCHEMISTRY MERC, P1
[3]   Determination of mercury binding forms in contaminated soils: Mercury pyrolysis versus sequential extractions [J].
Biester, H ;
Scholz, C .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1997, 31 (01) :233-239
[4]   SIMPLE TITRIMETRIC METHOD FOR DETERMINATION OF INORGANIC CARBON IN SOILS [J].
BUNDY, LG ;
BREMNER, JM .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA PROCEEDINGS, 1972, 36 (02) :273-&
[5]  
*CAN COUNC MIN ENV, 1997, CAN COUNC MIN ENV WO
[6]  
CROCK JG, 1996, METHODS SOIL ANAL 3
[7]   GEOCHEMISTRY OF MERCURY IN PALOS-VERDES SEDIMENTS [J].
EGANHOUSE, RP ;
YOUNG, DR ;
JOHNSON, JN .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1978, 12 (10) :1151-1157
[8]   INFLUENCE OF CHEMICAL FORM OF MERCURY ON ITS ADSORPTION AND ABILITY TO LEACH THROUGH SOILS [J].
HOGG, TJ ;
STEWART, JWB ;
BETTANY, JR .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 1978, 7 (03) :440-445
[9]  
KOHUT CK, 1995, HG00395 ALB ENV PROT
[10]   Mercury and organic carbon relationships in streams draining forested upland peatland watersheds [J].
Kolka, RK ;
Grigal, DF ;
Verry, ES ;
Nater, EA .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 1999, 28 (03) :766-775