Correlation between Harris, modified Harris hip, and Oxford hip scores of patients who underwent hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty following hip fracture

被引:5
作者
Kizkapan, Turan Bilge [1 ]
Misir, Abdulhamit [2 ]
Eken, Gokay [3 ]
Oguzkaya, Sinan [4 ]
Ozcamdalli, Mustafa [2 ]
Uzun, Erdal [5 ]
机构
[1] Bursa Cekirge State Hosp, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Bursa, Turkey
[2] Basaksehir Pine & Sakura City Hosp, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Bursa Acibadem Hosp, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Bursa, Turkey
[4] Sivas Sarkisla State Hosp, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Sivas, Turkey
[5] Erciyes Univ, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Fac Med, Kayseri, Turkey
来源
ULUSAL TRAVMA VE ACIL CERRAHI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF TRAUMA & EMERGENCY SURGERY | 2022年 / 28卷 / 03期
关键词
Correlation; Crowe Type IV developmental dysplasia of the hip; Harris hip score; hemiarthroplasty; modified; range of motion; CROSS-CULTURAL ADAPTATION; FEMORAL-NECK FRACTURES; OUTCOME MEASURES; TURKISH VERSION; WESTERN ONTARIO; UNITED-STATES; REPLACEMENT; REVISION; VALIDATION; SURGERY;
D O I
10.14744/tjtes.2020.74560
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Harris hip score (HHS), modified HHS (MHHS), and Oxford hip score (OHS) were designed to determine the functional outcomes after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between MHHS, HHS, and OHS in different populations of arthroplasty such as primary THA, revision THA, THA for Crowe Type IV developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), and hip hemiarthroplasty (HA). METHODS: A total of 399 patients (254 females and 145 males) that included 128 cases of primary THA, 36 of revision THA, 200 of HA, and 35 of THA with femoral shortening osteotomy with a minimum of 24 months of follow-up were included. HHS, MHHS, and OHS were calculated for each patient and the correlation between theses scores was evaluated for each subgroup. RESULTS: The overall mean age was 67.5 +/- 14.3 years. The mean HHS, MHHS, and OHS were 74.9 +/- 17.9, 75.7 +/- 18.7, and 38.7 +/- 12.5, respectively. A very strong correlation was observed between HHS and MHHS (r=0.995, p=0.000) as well as between HHS and OHS (r=0.845, p=0.003) in the general study population. In subgroup analysis, there was a very strong correlation between HHS and MHHS in primary THA, revision THA, THA in hip HA, and Crowe Type IV DDH groups (r=0.984, p=0.000; r=0.977, p=0.000; r=0.984, p=0.000; and r=0.995, p=0.000; respectively). However, there was a significant correlation between HHS and OHS in these groups except revision THA group (r=0.851, p=0.023; r=0.587, p=0.069; r=0.989, p=0.002; and r=0.965, p=0.000; respectively). CONCLUSION: This is the first study to investigate the usefulness of MHHS and OHS in hip HA and THA in patients with Crowe Type IV DDH. Our findings suggest that MHHS and OHS are useful for evaluating functional outcomes with HA, primary and revision THA, and THA with femoral shortening osteotomy for Crowe type IV DDH.
引用
收藏
页码:308 / 314
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Does the Modified Harris Hip Score Reflect Patient Satisfaction After Hip Arthroscopy? [J].
Aprato, Alessandro ;
Jayasekera, Narlaka ;
Villar, Richard N. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2012, 40 (11) :2557-2560
[2]  
Buttaro MA, 2017, ORTHOPEDICS, V40, pE255, DOI [10.3928/1477447-20161108-03, 10.3928/01477447-20161108-03]
[3]   Prospective analysis of hip arthroscopy with 2-year follow-up [J].
Byrd, JWT ;
Jones, KS .
ARTHROSCOPY, 2000, 16 (06) :578-587
[4]   Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the Turkish version of the Harris Hip Score [J].
Celik, Derya ;
Can, Canan ;
Aslan, Yasemin ;
Ceylan, Hasan Huseyin ;
Bilsel, Kerem ;
Ozdincler, Arzu Razak .
HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 24 (05) :473-479
[5]   Comparison of measures to assess outcomes in total hip replacement surgery [J].
Dawson, J ;
Fitzpatrick, R ;
Murray, D ;
Carr, A .
QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 1996, 5 (02) :81-88
[6]   Issues relating to long-term follow-up in hip arthroplasty surgery - A review of 598 cases at 7 years comparing 2 prostheses using revision rates, survival analysis, and patient-based measures [J].
Dawson, J ;
Jameson-Shortall, E ;
Emerton, M ;
Flynn, J ;
Smith, P ;
Gundle, R ;
Murray, D .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2000, 15 (06) :710-717
[7]   Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement [J].
Dawson, J ;
Fitzpatrick, R ;
Carr, A ;
Murray, D .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1996, 78B (02) :185-190
[8]   Are Range of Motion Measurements Needed When Calculating the Harris Hip Score? [J].
Edwards, Paul K. ;
Queen, Robin M. ;
Butler, Robert J. ;
Bolognesi, Michael P. ;
Barnes, C. Lowry .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2016, 31 (04) :815-819
[9]   Outcome after femoral neck fractures: A comparison of Harris Hip Score, Eq-5d and Barthel Index [J].
Frihagen, Frede ;
Grotle, Margreth ;
Madsen, Jan Erik ;
Wyller, Torgeir Bruun ;
Mowinckel, Petter ;
Nordsletten, Lars .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2008, 39 (10) :1147-1156
[10]   Patients' outcome after total hip arthroplasty - A comparison between the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index and the Oxford 12-item Hip Score [J].
Garbuz, Donald S. ;
Xu, Min ;
Sayre, Eric C. .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2006, 21 (07) :998-1004