Bipolar disorder research 2.0: Web technologies for research capacity and knowledge translation

被引:1
作者
Michalak, Erin E. [1 ,7 ]
McBride, Sally [2 ]
Barnes, Steven J. [3 ,7 ]
Wood, Chanel S. [1 ,7 ]
Khatri, Nasreen [4 ,7 ]
Balram Elliott, Nusha [1 ,7 ]
Parikh, Sagar V. [5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Psychiat, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Sch Populat & Publ Hlth, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[3] Univ British Columbia, Dept Psychol, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[4] Rotman Res Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[6] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Collaborat Res Team Study Psychosocial Issues Bip, Vancouver, BC, Canada
关键词
bipolar disorder; community-based participatory research; knowledge translation; social media; Web; 2; 0; SOCIAL MEDIA; SCIENCE; CARE;
D O I
10.1111/jep.12736
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Rationale, aims and objectivesCurrent Web technologies offer bipolar disorder (BD) researchers many untapped opportunities for conducting research and for promoting knowledge exchange. In the present paper, we document our experiences with a variety of Web 2.0 technologies in the context of an international BD research network: The Collaborative RESearch Team to Study psychosocial issues in BD (CREST.BD). MethodsThree technologies were used as tools for enabling research within CREST.BD and for encouraging the dissemination of the results of our research: (1) the crestbd.ca website, (2) social networking tools (ie, Facebook, Twitter), and (3) several sorts of file sharing (ie YouTube, FileShare). For each Web technology, we collected quantitative assessments of their effectiveness (in reach, exposure, and engagement) over a 6-year timeframe (2010-2016). ResultsIn general, many of our strategies were deemed successful for promoting knowledge exchange and other network goals. We discuss how we applied our Web analytics to inform adaptations and refinements of our Web 2.0 platforms to maximise knowledge exchange with people with BD, their supporters, and health care providers. ConclusionsWe conclude with some general recommendations for other mental health researchers and research networks interested in pursuing Web 2.0 strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:1144 / 1152
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Social Media Release Increases Dissemination of Original Articles in the Clinical Pain Sciences
    Allen, Heidi G.
    Stanton, Tasha R.
    Di Pietro, Flavia
    Moseley, G. Lorimer
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (07):
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2013, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH
  • [3] Evaluation of a Web Portal for Improving Public Access to Evidence-Based Health Information and Health Literacy Skills: A Pragmatic Trial
    Austvoll-Dahlgren, Astrid
    Bjorndal, Arild
    Odgaard-Jensen, Jan
    Helseth, Solvi
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (05):
  • [4] Using Facebook to Recruit Young Adults for Qualitative Research Projects: How Difficult Is It?
    Balfe, Myles
    Doyle, Frank
    Conroy, Ronan
    [J]. CIN-COMPUTERS INFORMATICS NURSING, 2012, 30 (10) : 511 - 515
  • [5] An Introduction to Social Media for Scientists
    Bik, Holly M.
    Goldstein, Miriam C.
    [J]. PLOS BIOLOGY, 2013, 11 (04)
  • [6] Boillot A, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI [10.1371/journal.pone.0052708, 10.1371/journal.pone.0064417]
  • [7] Science, New Media, and the Public
    Brossard, Dominique
    Scheufele, Dietram A.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2013, 339 (6115) : 40 - 41
  • [8] Canadian Institutes of Health Research, 2011, KNOWL TRANSL CIHR IN
  • [9] Getting started in CBPR: lessons in building community partnerships for new researchers
    D'Alonzo, Karen Therese
    [J]. NURSING INQUIRY, 2010, 17 (04) : 282 - 288
  • [10] Why Public Dissemination of Science Matters: A Manifesto
    Eagleman, David M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 33 (30) : 12147 - 12149