Supply kits for antenatal and childbirth care: a systematic review

被引:9
作者
Aleman, Alicia [1 ]
Tomasso, Giselle [1 ]
Luisa Cafferata, Maria [1 ]
Colomar, Mercedes [1 ]
Betran, Ana Pilar [2 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Clin Montevideo, Montevideo Clin & Res Unit, Avda Italia S-N, Montevideo 11600, Uruguay
[2] WHO, UNDP UNFPA UNICEF, World Bank Special Programme Res Dev & Res Traini, Ave Appia 20, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
关键词
Supply kits; Clean delivery kits; Pregnancy; Childbirth; Maternal mortality; Neonatal mortality; TRADITIONAL BIRTH ATTENDANTS; CLEAN DELIVERY-KIT; DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES; CRITICAL-APPRAISAL; NEONATAL TETANUS; UMBILICAL-CORD; HEALTH; QUALITY; INTERVENTION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1186/s12978-017-0436-9
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction: It is critical to increase the uptake of interventions proven to be effective to improve maternal and perinatal outcomes. Supply kits have been suggested to be a feasible strategy designed to ensure timely availability and effective follow-up of care. Objective: We conducted a systematic review to summarize the evidence on the uptake, effectiveness and safety of supply kits for maternal care. Search strategy: MEDLINE, the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register, Campbell Collaboration, Lilacs, Embase and unpublished studies were searched. Selection criteria: Studies that reported the efficacy, safety and use of supply kits for maternal healthcare were eligible. Participants were pregnant women or in childbirth. Supply kits were defined as a collection of medicines, supplies or instruments packaged together with the aim of conducting a healthcare task. Data collection and analysis: Two reviewers independently performed the screening, data extraction, and methodological and quality assessment. Main results: 24 studies were included: 4 of them were systematic reviews and 20 primary studies. Eighteen studies evaluated a so-called "clean delivery kit". In all but two studies, the kits were used by more than half of the participants. A meta-analysis was deemed inappropriate due to the heterogeneity in study design, in the components of the interventions implemented, in the content of the kits, and in outcomes. Nine studies assessed neonatal outcomes and found statistically significant reductions in cord infection, sepsis and tetanus-related mortality in the intervention group. Three studies showed evidence of reduced neonatal mortality (OR 0.52, 0.60 and 0.71) with statistically significant confidence intervals in all cases. Four studies reported odd ratios for maternal mortality, but only one showed evidence of a statistically significant decrease in this outcome but it was ascribed to hand washing prior to childbirth and not with the use of kits. Conclusion: This review suggests potential benefits in the use of supply kits to improve maternal and neonatal health. However, the observational nature of the studies, the heterogeneity and the use of kits incorporated within complex interventions limit the interpretation of the findings.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Hypnosis for pain relief in labour and childbirth: a systematic review [J].
Cyna, AM ;
McAuliffe, GL ;
Andrew, MI .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2004, 93 (04) :505-511
[42]   The psychometric properties of fear of childbirth instruments: a systematic review [J].
Hoseini, Bibi Leila ;
Ebadi, Abbas ;
Mashhadi, Ali ;
Rakhshani, Mohammad Hassan ;
Babazadeh, Raheleh .
REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2024, 21 (01)
[43]   Antenatal Care Reduces Neonatal Mortality in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies [J].
Tiruye, Getahun ;
Shiferaw, Kasiye .
MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH JOURNAL, 2023, 27 (12) :2064-2076
[44]   Factors impacting antenatal care utilization: a systematic review of 37 fragile and conflict-affected situations [J].
Alibhai, Kameela Miriam ;
Ziegler, Bianca R. ;
Meddings, Louise ;
Batung, Evans ;
Luginaah, Isaac .
CONFLICT AND HEALTH, 2022, 16 (01)
[45]   Factors Influencing the Provision of Oral Health Care Practices by Antenatal Care Providers: A Systematic Review [J].
Wilson, Annika ;
Hoang, Ha ;
Bridgman, Heather ;
Bettiol, Silvana ;
Crocombe, Leonard .
JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2022, 31 (02) :231-241
[46]   PTSD post-childbirth: a systematic review of women's and midwives' subjective experiences of care provider interaction [J].
Patterson, Jenny ;
Martin, Caroline Hollins ;
Karatzias, Thanos .
JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE AND INFANT PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 37 (01) :56-83
[47]   Determinants of antenatal care utilisation in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review [J].
Okedo-Alex, Ijeoma Nkem ;
Akamike, Ifeyinwa Chizoba ;
Ezeanosike, Obumneme Benaiah ;
Uneke, Chigozie Jesse .
BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (10)
[48]   Factors affecting the utilization of antenatal care in developing countries: systematic review of the literature [J].
Simkhada, Bibha ;
van Teijlingen, Edwin R. ;
Porter, Maureen ;
Simkhada, Padam .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2008, 61 (03) :244-260
[50]   Fear of childbirth in Iran: A systematic review of psychological intervention research [J].
Azizi, Marzieh ;
Kamali, Mahsa ;
Elyasi, Forouzan ;
Shirzad, Mahboobeh .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE, 2021, 19 (05) :401-420