Supply kits for antenatal and childbirth care: a systematic review

被引:9
作者
Aleman, Alicia [1 ]
Tomasso, Giselle [1 ]
Luisa Cafferata, Maria [1 ]
Colomar, Mercedes [1 ]
Betran, Ana Pilar [2 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Clin Montevideo, Montevideo Clin & Res Unit, Avda Italia S-N, Montevideo 11600, Uruguay
[2] WHO, UNDP UNFPA UNICEF, World Bank Special Programme Res Dev & Res Traini, Ave Appia 20, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
关键词
Supply kits; Clean delivery kits; Pregnancy; Childbirth; Maternal mortality; Neonatal mortality; TRADITIONAL BIRTH ATTENDANTS; CLEAN DELIVERY-KIT; DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES; CRITICAL-APPRAISAL; NEONATAL TETANUS; UMBILICAL-CORD; HEALTH; QUALITY; INTERVENTION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1186/s12978-017-0436-9
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction: It is critical to increase the uptake of interventions proven to be effective to improve maternal and perinatal outcomes. Supply kits have been suggested to be a feasible strategy designed to ensure timely availability and effective follow-up of care. Objective: We conducted a systematic review to summarize the evidence on the uptake, effectiveness and safety of supply kits for maternal care. Search strategy: MEDLINE, the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register, Campbell Collaboration, Lilacs, Embase and unpublished studies were searched. Selection criteria: Studies that reported the efficacy, safety and use of supply kits for maternal healthcare were eligible. Participants were pregnant women or in childbirth. Supply kits were defined as a collection of medicines, supplies or instruments packaged together with the aim of conducting a healthcare task. Data collection and analysis: Two reviewers independently performed the screening, data extraction, and methodological and quality assessment. Main results: 24 studies were included: 4 of them were systematic reviews and 20 primary studies. Eighteen studies evaluated a so-called "clean delivery kit". In all but two studies, the kits were used by more than half of the participants. A meta-analysis was deemed inappropriate due to the heterogeneity in study design, in the components of the interventions implemented, in the content of the kits, and in outcomes. Nine studies assessed neonatal outcomes and found statistically significant reductions in cord infection, sepsis and tetanus-related mortality in the intervention group. Three studies showed evidence of reduced neonatal mortality (OR 0.52, 0.60 and 0.71) with statistically significant confidence intervals in all cases. Four studies reported odd ratios for maternal mortality, but only one showed evidence of a statistically significant decrease in this outcome but it was ascribed to hand washing prior to childbirth and not with the use of kits. Conclusion: This review suggests potential benefits in the use of supply kits to improve maternal and neonatal health. However, the observational nature of the studies, the heterogeneity and the use of kits incorporated within complex interventions limit the interpretation of the findings.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Heteronormative communication with lesbian families in antenatal care, childbirth and postnatal care
    Rondahl, Gerd
    Bruhner, Elisabeth
    Lindhe, Jenny
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2009, 65 (11) : 2337 - 2344
  • [22] Including the Excluded in Antenatal Care: A Systematic Review of Concerns for D/deaf Pregnant Women
    Adigun, Olufemi Timothy
    Akinrinoye, Olugbenga
    Obilor, Helen Ngozichukwuka
    BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 2021, 11 (05)
  • [23] The effect of antenatal care on perinatal outcomes in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shiferaw, Kasiye
    Mengiste, Bizatu
    Gobena, Tesfaye
    Dheresa, Merga
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (01):
  • [24] A Systematic Review to Explore Antenatal Care From the Perspectives of Women With Intellectual Disabilities and Midwives
    Alhulaibi, Weam
    Stockdale, Janine
    Mcaleer, Paul
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF LEARNING DISABILITIES, 2024, : 87 - 102
  • [25] Patient reported outcome measures for use in pregnancy and childbirth: a systematic review
    Dickinson, Fiona
    McCauley, Mary
    Smith, Helen
    van den Broek, Nynke
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [26] Hypnosis-based interventions during pregnancy and childbirth and their impact on women's childbirth experience: A systematic review
    Catsaros, Stephanie
    Wendland, Jaqueline
    MIDWIFERY, 2020, 84
  • [27] Antenatal Fear of Childbirth as a Risk Factor for a Bad Childbirth Experience
    Ruger-Navarrete, Azahara
    Vazquez-Lara, Juana Maria
    Antunez-Calvente, Irene
    Rodriguez-Diaz, Luciano
    Riesco-Gonzalez, Francisco Javier
    Palomo-Gomez, Rocio
    Gomez-Salgado, Juan
    Fernandez-Carrasco, Francisco Javier
    HEALTHCARE, 2023, 11 (03)
  • [28] Evaluation of the Program for Humanization of Prenatal and Childbirth Care in Brazil: a systematic review
    Andreucci, Carla Betina
    Cecatti, Jose Guilherme
    CADERNOS DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2011, 27 (06): : 1053 - 1064
  • [29] Provision of medical supply kits to improve quality of antenatal care in Mozambique: a stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial
    Betran, Ana Pilar
    Bergel, Eduardo
    Griffin, Sally
    Melo, Armando
    Nguyen, My Huong
    Carbonell, Alicia
    Mondlane, Santos
    Merialdi, Mario
    Temmerman, Marleen
    Gulmezoglu, A. Metin
    LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH, 2018, 6 (01): : E57 - E65
  • [30] Childbirth and parenting preparation in antenatal classes
    Barimani, M.
    Frykedal, K. Forslund
    Rosander, M.
    Berlin, A.
    MIDWIFERY, 2018, 57 : 1 - 7